83 FR 6970 - Approval and Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of New York; Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation Plans
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 33 (February 16, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 33 (February 16, 2018)
| Page Range | 6970-6972 | |
| FR Document | 2018-03192 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 6970-6972] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-03192] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0340; FRL-9974-47-Region 2] Approval and Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of New York; Regional Haze State and Federal Implementation Plans AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a source-specific revision to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP revision establishes Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) emission limits for sulfur dioxide that are identical to those set by the EPA's Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the Roseton Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, which was promulgated in an action taken on August 28, 2012. The EPA finds that the SIP revision fulfills the requirements of the Clean Air Act and the EPA's Regional Haze Rule for Roseton Units 1 and 2. In conjunction with this approval, the EPA is withdrawing the FIP that addresses BART for Roseton Units 1 and 2. DATES: This rule is effective on March 19, 2018. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R02-OAR-2017-0340. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section for additional available information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene B. Nielson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866 at 212-637-3586 or by email at nielson.irene@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. What action is the EPA taking today? II. What significant comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed action? III. What are the EPA's conclusions? IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is the EPA taking today? The EPA is approving a source-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for Units 1 and 2 of the Roseton Generating Station submitted by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) on April 18, 2017. The EPA is approving emission limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) for Roseton Units 1 and 2 that are equivalent to the emission limits established by the EPA's Federal Implementation Plan (FIP), which was promulgated on August 28, 2012 (77 FR 51915). In its submittal, the NYSDEC included the following BART emission limits for Roseton Units 1 and 2: 0.55 pounds of SO2 per million British thermal unit (lb SO2 /MMBtu) calculated on a 24-hour average for each unit.\1\ As a result of the EPA's approval, the EPA is withdrawing those portions of the FIP that address BART for Roseton Units 1 and 2. The reader is referred to the EPA's proposal, 82 FR 48942 (October 23, 2017), for a detailed discussion of this SIP revision. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ In the SIP submittal and in subsequent correspondence with the EPA, NYSDEC notes the oxides of nitrogen (NOX ) and Particulate Matter (PM) limits for Roseton Generating Station Units 1 and 2, which were not subject to the FIP and are not part of this SIP action, are consistent with BART limits approved by EPA in its August 28, 2012 Final Action on New York's Regional Haze SIP (77 FR 51915). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. What significant comments were received in response to the EPA's proposed action? During the public comment period, three interested parties submitted comments on the EPA's proposal. Two comments expressed support of this action. A third commenter expressed support for the benefits of reduced sulfur for public health and raised the following two additional comments. Comment 1: The commenter questioned the need for the SIP revision since the FIP was already in place. Response: The Clean Air Act (CAA) obligates the EPA to act on a State's SIP submittal or revision, provided the submittal meets minimum completeness criteria. CAA section 110(k) (1); 40 CFR [[Page 6971]] part 51, appendix V. Because the SIP revision meets CAA requirements, we are required to approve it. See CAA section 110(k)(3), (l). Comment 2: The commenter suggested that the State should submit new or updated enforcement rules. Response: It is unclear what the commenter means by ``new or updated enforcement rules.'' NYSDEC submitted a SIP revision to address the BART requirements for Roseton Units 1 and 2. The commenter has not identified any issues with the SIP revision that would warrant a change in the EPA's proposal to approve it. III. What are the EPA's conclusions? The EPA has evaluated the Roseton SIP Revision and is determining that it meets the requirements of the CAA and the Regional Haze Rule. Therefore, the EPA is approving the BART emission limits and related administrative requirements (i.e., monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements) for Roseton Units 1 and 2, which are identical to those contained in the EPA's 2012 FIP: 0.55 pounds of SO2 per million British thermal unit (lb SO2 /MMBtu) calculated on a 24-hour average for each unit (Units 1 and 2). Consequently, the EPA is withdrawing those portions of the 2012 FIP that address BART for Roseton Units 1 and 2. At the time of the proposal, Roseton and Danskammer were the only two sources in New York State subject to the Regional Haze FIP (77 FR 51915). In a separate action, effective January 3, 2018, the EPA withdrew the FIP requirements for Danskammer after approving a source- specific SIP (82 FR 57126). In this action, the EPA is similarly approving a source-specific SIP for Roseton and withdrawing the FIP requirements for that facility. Upon the effective date of the Federal Register notice, the requirements in the approved SIP for Roseton Generating Station Units 1 and 2 will apply, the FIP requirements for Roseton Generating Station Units 1 and 2 will be withdrawn, and the Regional Haze FIP, 40 CFR 52.1686, will be removed in its entirety. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of a single-source SIP revision, dated April 18, 2017, for Roseton Units 1 and 2 (Facility DEC ID 3334600075), including Title V permit conditions (permit ID 3-3346-00075/0008) that include BART emission limits for SO2 . The summary of emission limits and other enforceable requirements in this SIP revision are included in section I of this notice. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 2 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) because it will result in the approval of a SIP submitted by the NYSDEC for Roseton Units 1 and 2. Approval of SIPs falls within a category of actions that is exempt from review by OMB. It was therefore not submitted to OMB for review. B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this action falls within the category of actions that OMB has exempted from review. This action specifically is an approval of a SIP. C. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).\3\ Because this final rule has identical recordkeeping and reporting requirements to the EPA's 2012 FIP, the PRA does not apply. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- D. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This rule does not impose any requirements or create impacts on small entities as no small entities are subject to the requirements of this rule. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate of $100 million or more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Because this final rule has identical BART emission limits and related administrative requirements (i.e., monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements) to the EPA's 2012 FIP, this final rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of UMRA. This final rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. [[Page 6972]] I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. Therefore, the EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards. K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). As explained previously, the SIP revision being approved in this action includes identical BART emission limits and related administrative requirements (i.e., monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements) to the EPA's 2012 FIP. L. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular applicability. M. Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 17, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: February 8, 2018. E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart HH--New York 0 2. In Sec. 52.1670, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by revising the entry ``Roseton Generating Station-Dynegy'' to read as follows: Sec. 52.1670 Identification of plan. * * * * * (d) * * * EPA-Approved New York Source-Specific Provisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State EPA approval Name of source Identifier No. effective date date Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Roseton Generating Station........ NYSDEC Facility No. 12/5/2016 2/16/2018 Best Available 33346000075. Retrofit Technology (BART) emission limits for SO2 pursuant to 6 NYCRR part 249 for Units 1 and 2. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * Sec. 52.1686 [Removed and Reserved] 0 3. Section 52.1686 is removed and reserved. [FR Doc. 2018-03192 Filed 2-15-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![6970 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Congress and to the Comptroller General the requirements for both the State’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of the United States. EPA will submit a marginal and moderate classifications. Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
report containing this action and other [FR Doc. 2018–03252 Filed 2–15–18; 8:45 am] and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
required information to the U.S. Senate, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Table of Contents
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United I. What action is the EPA taking today?
States prior to publication of the rule in ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION II. What significant comments were received
the Federal Register. A major rule AGENCY in response to the EPA’s proposed
cannot take effect until 60 days after it action?
40 CFR Part 52 III. What are the EPA’s conclusions?
is published in the Federal Register. IV. Incorporation by Reference
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as [EPA–R02–OAR–2017–0340; FRL–9974–47– V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Region 2]
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean I. What action is the EPA taking today?
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of Approval and Revision of Air Quality The EPA is approving a source-
this action must be filed in the United Implementation Plans; State of New specific State Implementation Plan (SIP)
States Court of Appeals for the Second York; Regional Haze State and Federal revision for Units 1 and 2 of the Roseton
Circuit by April 17, 2018. Filing a Implementation Plans Generating Station submitted by the
petition for reconsideration by the AGENCY: Environmental Protection New York State Department of
Administrator of this final rule does not Agency. Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
affect the finality of this action for the ACTION: Final rule.
on April 18, 2017. The EPA is approving
purposes of judicial review nor does it emission limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2)
extend the time within which a petition SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection for Roseton Units 1 and 2 that are
for judicial review may be filed, and Agency (EPA) is approving a source- equivalent to the emission limits
shall not postpone the effectiveness of specific revision to the New York State established by the EPA’s Federal
such rule or action. This action may not Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP Implementation Plan (FIP), which was
be challenged later in proceedings to revision establishes Best Available promulgated on August 28, 2012 (77 FR
enforce its requirements. (See section Retrofit Technology (BART) emission 51915).
307(b)(2).) limits for sulfur dioxide that are In its submittal, the NYSDEC
identical to those set by the EPA’s included the following BART emission
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for limits for Roseton Units 1 and 2: 0.55
Environmental protection, Air the Roseton Generating Station, Units 1 pounds of SO2 per million British
pollution control, Incorporation by and 2, which was promulgated in an thermal unit (lb SO2/MMBtu) calculated
reference, Intergovernmental relations, action taken on August 28, 2012. The on a 24-hour average for each unit.1 As
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and EPA finds that the SIP revision fulfills a result of the EPA’s approval, the EPA
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile the requirements of the Clean Air Act is withdrawing those portions of the FIP
organic compounds. and the EPA’s Regional Haze Rule for that address BART for Roseton Units 1
Roseton Units 1 and 2. In conjunction and 2. The reader is referred to the
Dated: February 6, 2018.
with this approval, the EPA is EPA’s proposal, 82 FR 48942 (October
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, withdrawing the FIP that addresses 23, 2017), for a detailed discussion of
Regional Administrator, EPA New England. BART for Roseton Units 1 and 2. this SIP revision.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the DATES: This rule is effective on March
II. What significant comments were
Code of Federal Regulations is amended 19, 2018.
received in response to the EPA’s
as follows: ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a proposed action?
docket for this action under Docket ID
PART 52—APPROVAL AND No. EPA–R02–OAR–2017–0340. All During the public comment period,
PROMULGATION OF documents in the docket are listed on three interested parties submitted
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS the www.regulations.gov website. comments on the EPA’s proposal. Two
Although listed in the index, some comments expressed support of this
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 information is not publicly available, action. A third commenter expressed
continues to read as follows: e.g., confidential business information support for the benefits of reduced
(CBI) or other information whose sulfur for public health and raised the
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
disclosure is restricted by statute. following two additional comments.
Subpart H—Connecticut Certain other material, such as Comment 1: The commenter
copyrighted material, is not placed on questioned the need for the SIP revision
■ 2. Section 52.377 is amended by the internet and will be publicly since the FIP was already in place.
adding paragraph (r) to read as follows: available only in hard copy form. Response: The Clean Air Act (CAA)
Publicly available docket materials are obligates the EPA to act on a State’s SIP
§ 52.377 Control strategy: Ozone. available through www.regulations.gov, submittal or revision, provided the
* * * * * or please contact the person identified submittal meets minimum completeness
(r) Approval—Submittal from the in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION criteria. CAA section 110(k) (1); 40 CFR
Connecticut Department of Energy and CONTACT section for additional available
1 In the SIP submittal and in subsequent
Environmental Protection dated March information.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
correspondence with the EPA, NYSDEC notes the
9, 2017, to address the nonattainment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and Particulate Matter
new source review requirements for the Irene B. Nielson, Environmental (PM) limits for Roseton Generating Station Units 1
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Protection Agency, Air Programs and 2, which were not subject to the FIP and are
not part of this SIP action, are consistent with
Greater Connecticut and the New York- Branch, 290 Broadway, New York, New BART limits approved by EPA in its August 28,
N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY–NJ–CT York 10007–1866 at 212–637–3586 or 2012 Final Action on New York’s Regional Haze SIP
ozone nonattainment areas, as it meets by email at nielson.irene@epa.gov. (77 FR 51915).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Feb 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM 16FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7003/page/1.svg)
![6972 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions and related administrative requirements reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Concerning Regulations That (i.e., monitoring, recordkeeping and Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, reporting requirements) to the EPA’s Reporting and recordkeeping
Distribution, or Use 2012 FIP. requirements, Sulfur oxides.
This action is not subject to Executive L. Congressional Review Act (CRA) Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, Dated: February 8, 2018.
2001) because it is not a significant This rule is exempt from the CRA
because it is a rule of particular E. Scott Pruitt,
regulatory action under Executive Order
applicability. Administrator.
12866.
M. Judicial Review Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
J. National Technology Transfer and
of Federal Regulations is amended as
Advancement Act Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, follows:
This rulemaking does not involve petitions for judicial review of this
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA action must be filed in the United States PART 52—APPROVAL AND
is not considering the use of any Court of Appeals for the appropriate PROMULGATION OF
voluntary consensus standards. circuit by April 17, 2018. Filing a IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
petition for reconsideration by the
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Administrator of this final rule does not ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
Actions To Address Environmental affect the finality of this action for the continues to read as follows:
Justice in Minority Populations and purposes of judicial review nor does it
Low-Income Populations Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
extend the time within which a petition
The EPA believes that this action does for judicial review may be filed, and Subpart HH—New York
not have disproportionately high and shall not postpone the effectiveness of
adverse human health or environmental such rule or action. This action may not ■ 2. In § 52.1670, the table in paragraph
effects on minority populations, low- be challenged later in proceedings to (d) is amended by revising the entry
income populations and/or indigenous enforce its requirements. See CAA ‘‘Roseton Generating Station-Dynegy’’ to
peoples, as specified in Executive Order section 307(b)(2). read as follows:
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
As explained previously, the SIP List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 § 52.1670 Identification of plan.
revision being approved in this action Environmental protection, Air * * * * *
includes identical BART emission limits pollution control, Incorporation by (d) * * *
EPA-APPROVED NEW YORK SOURCE-SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
State effective EPA approval
Name of source Identifier No. Comments
date date
* * * * * * *
Roseton Generating Station ........... NYSDEC Facility No. 12/5/2016 2/16/2018 Best Available Retrofit Technology
33346000075. (BART) emission limits for SO2
pursuant to 6 NYCRR part 249
for Units 1 and 2.
* * * * * * *
* * * * * ACTION: Final rule. DATES: This rule is effective on March
19, 2018.
§ 52.1686 [Removed and Reserved]
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
■ 3. Section 52.1686 is removed and Agency (EPA) is approving State docket for this action under Docket
reserved. Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
[FR Doc. 2018–03192 Filed 2–15–18; 8:45 am] submitted by the State of New 2017–0138. All documents in the docket
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Hampshire on August 9, 2011 and July are listed on the www.regulations.gov
23, 2013. These SIP revisions establish website. Although listed in the index,
rules for open burning and establish some information is not publicly
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION emission standards and operating available, i.e., confidential business
AGENCY practices for incinerators and wood information (CBI) or other information
waste burners that are not regulated whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
40 CFR Part 52
pursuant to Federal incinerator Certain other material, such as
standards. We are also approving copyrighted material, is not placed on
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0138; FRL–9973–19– revisions to the definitions of the internet and will be publicly
Region 1]
‘‘Incinerator’’ and ‘‘Wood Waste available only in hard copy form.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Burner,’’ submitted by the State on July Publicly available docket materials are
Rules for Open Burning and 23, 2013 and October 26, 2016, available at www.regulations.gov or at
Incinerators respectively. This action is being taken the U.S. Environmental Protection
in accordance with the Clean Air Act Agency, EPA New England Regional
AGENCY: Environmental Protection (CAA). Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
Agency (EPA). Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 Feb 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM 16FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7003/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-16 00:55:41
Document Modified: 2018-02-16 00:55:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on March 19, 2018. | |
| Contact | Irene B. Nielson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866 at 212-637-3586 or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 6970 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR