83 FR 7129 - Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northern Gulf of Maine Measures in Framework Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 34 (February 20, 2018)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 34 (February 20, 2018)
| Page Range | 7129-7135 | |
| FR Document | 2018-03319 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 7129-7135] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-03319] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648 [Docket No.: 180110025-8025-01] RIN 0648-BH51 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northern Gulf of Maine Measures in Framework Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS proposes some of the measures included in Framework Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan that establish scallop specifications and other measures for the Northern Gulf of Maine scallop management area for fishing years 2018 and 2019. This action is necessary to prevent overfishing and improve both yield- per-recruit and the overall management of the Atlantic sea scallop resource in the Northern Gulf of Maine. The intended effect of this rule is to notify the public of these proposed measures and to solicit comment on the potential scallop fishery management changes. [[Page 7130]] DATES: Comments must be received by March 7, 2018. ADDRESSES: The New England Fishery Management Council has prepared a draft environmental assessment (EA) for this action that describes the proposed measures, other considered alternatives, and analyzes the impacts of the proposed measures and alternatives. The Council submitted a decision draft of the framework to NMFS that includes the draft EA, a description of the Council's preferred alternatives, the Council's rationale for selecting each alternative, and an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA). Copies of the decision draft of Framework Adjustment 29, the draft EA, and the IRFA, are available upon request from Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA 01950. You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA-NMFS- 2018-0007, by either of the following methods:Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2018-0007, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Mail: Regional Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope, ``Comments on Northern Gulf of Maine Measures in Framework Adjustment 29.'' Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter z ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Travis Ford, Fishery Policy Analyst, 978-281-9233. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The scallop fishery's management unit ranges from the shorelines of Maine through North Carolina to the outer boundary of the Exclusive Economic Zone. The Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan (FMP), established in 1982, includes a number of amendments and framework adjustments that have revised and refined the fishery's management. The New England Fishery Management Council sets scallop fishery catch limits and other management measures through specification or framework adjustments that occur annually or biennially. The Council adopted Framework Adjustment 29 (Framework 29) to the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP in its entirety on December 7, 2017, and submitted a decision draft of the framework, including a draft EA, to NMFS on December 21, 2017, for review and approval. Framework 29 includes catch, effort, and quota allocations and adjustments to the rotational area management program for fishing year 2018 and default specifications for fishing year 2019. This action proposes the portion of Framework 29 that establishes scallop specifications and other measures for the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) scallop management area for fishing years 2018 and 2019. These measures were developed to address harvesting activities by the limited access fleet in the past two years. In fishing years 2016 and 2017, the limited access fleet harvested substantially more scallops from the NGOM than they had since the beginning of the NGOM management program. Because the limited access fleet accessed the NGOM through the days-at-sea (DAS) program, there was no hard limit on its landings from the area. This resulted in total landings from the NGOM by the limited access fleet that far exceeded the total allowable catch (TAC) for the limited access general category (LAGC) fleet. The Council felt that this was inconsistent with the goals of the NGOM management program. Accordingly, the Council developed Framework 29, in part, to put measures in place to temporarily divide the catch more equitably between the two fleets and limit the total catch by the limited access fleet from the NGOM to a level consistent with its specified TAC for the NGOM. Prior to its approval of Framework 29 at its December meeting, the Council raised concerns regarding the complexity of Framework 29 and the timeline for implementation. Specifically, the Council was concerned that if the NGOM measures in Framework 29 are not in place by April 1, 2018, the limited access fleet could exceed its portion of the total allowable catch (TAC) proposed in the framework, potentially undermining the sustainability of the NGOM fishery in at least the short term. We informed the Council at the December meeting that we would consider separating out the NGOM measures in Framework 29 to ensure that they were in place prior to April 1, 2018. To help prevent excessive fishing in the NGOM, we are separating out the NGOM measures in Framework 29 to expedite their implementation. As a result, this action addresses only the portions of Framework 29 that affect fishing in the NGOM. We will address the remaining specifications and other management measure in Framework 29 in a follow-up action. This action would set new management measures in the NGOM for the scallop fishery for the 2018 and 2019 fishing years, including prohibiting the limited access fleet from accessing the NGOM while participating in the DAS program. In addition, this action would divide the annual NGOM TAC between the limited access fleet while on a research set-aside (RSA) trip and LAGC fleets for the 2018 and 2019 (default) fishing years as follows: Table 1--NGOM TAC for Fishing Years 2018 and 2019 [Default] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2018 2019 (default) Fleet --------------------------------------------------------------- lb kg lb kg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAGC............................................ 135,000 61,235 102,500 46,493 Limited access.................................. 65,000 29,484 32,500 14,742 --------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................................... 200,000 90,718 135,000 61,235 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 7131]] Setting the NGOM TAC The NGOM TAC would be set by applying a fishing mortality rate (F) of F = 0.18 using only the projected exploitable biomass on Jeffreys Ledge and Stellwagen Bank for fishing years 2018 and 2019. The Council chose to base the F rate only on these two areas because the Council projects that this is where the bulk of the fishing in the NGOM will take place. The 2017 survey of Stellwagen Bank did not see any signs of recruitment to the NGOM resource. Therefore, the Council chose to set a more conservative TAC for fishing years 2018 and 2019 that may lead to more consistent harvests in the NGOM. The overall TAC for the entire NGOM management area would be set at 200,000 lbs (90,718 kg) for fishing year 2018, and 135,000 lbs (61,235 kg) for fishing year 2019 (Table 1). Dividing the NGOM TAC If current measures remain in place for the NGOM, limited access scallop vessels will be able to fish in the NGOM while on DAS until the LAGC fleet reaches the TAC. Since this could result in extremely high catch and fishing mortality in the NGOM, this action would divide the TAC between the LAGC fleet and the limited access fleet while on a RSA trip at a level consistent with the biomass in the area. The NGOM TAC for the LAGC component was set at 70,000 lb (31,751 kg) from fishing year 2008 through fishing year 2016. Using this as a basis, the Council recommended that the first 70,000 lb (31,751 kg) of the NGOM TAC should be allocated to the LAGC fleet, and that any remaining pounds should be split equally between the LAGC and limited access fleets (Table 1). Each fleet would operate independently under its own portion of the TAC. The NGOM management area would remain open for each component until their TAC is projected to be harvested, even if the other component has reached its TAC. For example, if the LAGC component harvests its TAC before the limited access fleet harvests all of its allocation, the area would remain open for limited access fishing. The Council considered several options for temporarily dividing the TAC between the two fleets. This TAC division is intended to be a short- term solution to allow controlled fishing in the NGOM management area until the Council and NMFS can develop a future action to address NGOM issues more holistically. Managing Limited Access Removals This action would not change how the LAGC component currently operates in the NGOM. However, the limited access fleet would be prohibited from accessing the NGOM while participating in the DAS program. The limited access share of the NGOM TAC would be available through RSA compensation fishing only. Each year the Scallop FMP sets aside 1.25 million lb (566,990 kg) of scallops to fund research relevant to the FMP. RSA projects are selected through a competitive grants process, with priorities established by the Council. NMFS allocates award recipients a portion of the RSA quota and recipients use the money generated by the sale of the awarded RSA quota, to fund the proposed research. This action would allow NMFS to allocate the limited access portion of the NGOM TAC (65,000 lb (29,484 kg)) to be harvested as RSA compensation quota. This allocation would not be in addition to the 1.25 million lb (566,990 kg) RSA quota. When allocating this quota to specific projects, NMFS would give priority to projects that are relevant to the NGOM. Any limited access or LAGC vessels that NMFS awards NGOM RSA compensation pounds would be required to declare into the area and fish exclusively within the NGOM management area. Any NGOM RSA harvest overages would be deducted from the following year's limited access NGOM TAC. Capping removals for all fishery components at the specified portion of the NGOM TAC and requiring that all NGOM trips take place exclusively in the NGOM would allow the Council and NMFS to fully understand total removals from the area. Making the limited access share of the NGOM TAC available for RSA compensation fishing would be a short-term solution to utilize a small limited access portion of the NGOM TAC with the expectation that a more formal allocation and harvest strategy would be developed in a future amendment. The Council has reviewed the NGOM portions of the Framework 29 proposed rule regulations as drafted by NMFS and deemed them to be necessary and appropriate as specified in section 303(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson- Stevens Act). Classification Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment. This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. An IRFA has been prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. The IRFA consists of Framework 29 analyses of the NGOM measures, the draft IRFA, and the preamble to this proposed rule. Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being Considered and Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule This action proposes the management measures and specifications for the Atlantic sea scallop fishery in the NGOM for 2018, with 2019 default measures. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained in the Council's Framework 29 document and the preamble of this proposed rule and are not repeated here. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements of the Proposed Rule This action contains no new collection-of-information, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements. Accordingly, this proposed rule does not implicate the Paperwork Reduction Act. Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict With This Proposed Rule The proposed regulations do not create overlapping regulations with any state regulations or other federal laws. Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule Would Apply The proposed regulations would affect all vessels with limited access and LAGC scallop permits, but there is no differential effect based on whether the affected entities are small or large. Framework 29 provides extensive information on the number and size of vessels and small businesses that would be affected by the proposed regulations, by port and state (see ADDRESSES). Fishing year 2016 data were used for this analysis because these data are the most recent complete data set for a fishing year. There were 313 vessels that obtained full-time limited access permits in 2016, including 250 dredge, 52 small-dredge, and 11 scallop trawl permits. In the same year, there were also 34 part-time limited access permits [[Page 7132]] in the sea scallop fishery. No vessels were issued occasional scallop permits. NMFS issued 225 LAGC IFQ permits in 2016, and 125 of these vessels actively fished for scallops that year. The remaining permit holders likely leased out scallop IFQ allocations with their permits in Confirmation of Permit History. In 2016, there were 27 NGOM vessels that actively fished. For RFA purposes, NMFS defines a small business in shellfish fishery as a firm that is independently owned and operated with receipts of less than $11 million annually (see 50 CFR 200.2). Individually-permitted vessels may hold permits for several fisheries, harvesting species of fish that are regulated by several different fishery management plans, even beyond those impacted by this proposed rule. Furthermore, multiple permitted vessels and/or permits may be owned by entities with various personal and business affiliations. For the purposes of this analysis, ``ownership entities'' are defined as those entities with common ownership as listed on the permit application. Only permits with identical ownership are categorized as an ``ownership entity.'' For example, if five permits have the same seven persons listed as co-owners on their permit applications, those seven persons would form one ``ownership entity,'' that holds those five permits. If two of those seven owners also co-own additional vessels, that ownership arrangement would be considered a separate ``ownership entity'' for the purpose of this analysis. On June 1 of each year, ownership entities are identified based on a list of all permits for the most recent complete calendar year. The current ownership dataset is based on the calendar year 2016 permits and contains average gross sales associated with those permits for calendar years 2014 through 2016. Matching the potentially impacted 2016 fishing year permits described above (limited access permits and LAGC IFQ permits) to calendar year 2016 ownership data results in 161 distinct ownership entities for the limited access fleet and 115 distinct ownership entities for the LAGC IFQ fleet. Of these, and based on the Small Business Administration guidelines, 154 of the limited access distinct ownership entities and 113 of the LAGC IFQ entities are categorized as small. The remaining seven of the limited access and two of the LAGC IFQ entities are categorized as large entities. The number of distinct small business entities with NGOM permits and active NGOM vessels were 27 in 2016 permits. Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action Which Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and Which Minimize any Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities The Council considered three alternatives for setting a TAC in the NGOM: Alternative 1 (No Action, 95,000 lb (43,091 kg) TAC and no changes to management), Alternative 2 (Set NGOM TAC using exploitable biomass projections for 2018 and 2019, cap removals for all fishery components, and apply limited access share of TAC toward RSA compensation fishing), and Alternative 3 (Set NGOM TAC at 0 lb (0 kg)). Under the Council's preferred alternative, Alternative 2, there were two options for setting the TAC and each of these options had two sub- options for splitting the TAC between the limited access and the LAGC fleets. Option 1 (setting that TAC based on F = 0.15) included these two sub-options to split the TAC: Sub-option 1 (allocating the first 70,000 lb (31,751 kg) to LAGC fleet and the remaining TAC is split equally), and sub-option 2 (first 95,000 lb (43,091 kg) to LAGC fleet and the remaining TAC is split 25(LAGC)/75(limited access)). These two sub-options are described in Table 2. Under these sub-options scallop revenues and net revenues of the small business entities for the NGOM vessels would increase relative to No Action levels ranging from 19 percent to 27 percent. However, the preferred alternative (Alternative 2, Option 2, Sub-Option 1) would result in the highest economic benefits for this fishery with an estimated increase in net revenues by 42 percent compared to both Alternative 1 (No Action) and Alternative 3 (Set NGOM TAC at 0 lb (0 kg)). Table 2--Impacts of the Preferred Alternative 2 for NGOM Scallop Fishery [2018 Fishing Year] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Option 2 (F = 0.18)-- Option 1 (F = 0.15) Preferred ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Split Sub-Option 1 (70,000 lb (31,751 kg) then 50/50) Preferred ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LA scallop pounds........... 47500 lb (21546 kg). 65000 lb (29,484 kg) LAGC scallop pounds......... 117500 lb (53297 kg) 135000 lb (61,235 kg) Total Pounds................ 165000 lb (74843 kg) 200000 lb (90,718 kg) Net revenue (in 2017 Mill. 1.13................ 1.29 $). Net Revenue under No Action 0.91................ 0.91 (Alternative 1, in 2017 Mill. $). Percent Change in net 24 percent.......... 42 percent revenue per vessel and per business entity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Split Sub-Option 2 (95,000 lb (43,091 kg) then 25/75) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LA scallop pounds........... 52,500 lb (23,814 78,750 lb (35,720 kg). kg) LAGC scallop pounds......... 112,500 lb (51,029 121,250 lb (54,998 kg). kg) Total Pounds................ 16,5000 lb (74,843 200,000 lb (90,718 kg). kg) Estimated LA RSA value...... $643,125............ $964,687.5 Estimated LAGC scallop $1,378,125.......... $1,485,313 revenue. net revenue ( 2017 Mill. $). 1.08................ 1.16 Net Revenue under No Action 0.91................ 0.91 (Alternative 1, in 2017 Mill. $)). Percent Change in net 19 percent.......... 27 percent revenue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The economic impacts of the preferred NGOM alternative on the limited access vessels could range, however, from low negative to neutral. In both 2016 and 2017, limited access vessels were active in the NGOM [[Page 7133]] management area until it closed when the LAGC component was projected to have reached its TAC. Approximately 67 limited access vessels operated within the NGOM management area in 2017 while operating under DAS. Depending on the scallop resource productivity in the open areas, the cap on limited access landings from the NGOM and the requirement that limited access share would be harvested as RSA compensation fishing could have some marginally low negative impacts on the limited access fishery due to effort displacement to other areas which may not be as productive as the NGOM scallop fishery. List of Subjects 50 CFR Part 648 Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Dated: February 13, 2018. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES 0 1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows: Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Subpart A--General Provisions 0 2. In Sec. 648.10, revise paragraphs (f) introductory text, (f)(2) introductory text, and (f)(4)(i) to read as follows: Sec. 648.10 VMS and DAS requirements for vessel owners/operators. * * * * * (f) Atlantic sea scallop vessel VMS notification requirements. Less than 1 hour prior to leaving port, the owner or authorized representative of a scallop vessel that is required to use VMS as specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section must notify the Regional Administrator by transmitting the appropriate VMS code that the vessel will be participating in the scallop DAS program, Area Access Program, LAGC scallop fishery, fishing in the Northern Gulf of Maine management area, or will be fishing outside of the scallop fishery under the requirements of its other Federal permits, or that the vessel will be steaming to another location prior to commencing its fishing trip by transmitting a ``declared out of fishery'' VMS code. If the owner or authorized representative of a scallop vessel declares out of the fishery for the steaming portion of the trip, the vessel cannot possess, retain, or land scallops, or fish for any other fish. Prior to commencing the fishing trip following a ``declared out of fishery'' trip, the owner or authorized representative must notify the Regional Administrator by transmitting the appropriate VMS code, before first crossing the VMS Demarcation Line, that the vessel will be participating in the scallop DAS program, Area Access Program, or LAGC scallop fishery. VMS codes and instructions are available from the Regional Administrator upon request. * * * * * (2) NGOM scallop fishery. A NGOM scallop vessel is deemed to be fishing in Federal waters of the NGOM management area and will have its landings applied against the LAGC portion of the NGOM management area TAC, specified in Sec. 648.62(b)(1), unless: * * * * * (4) Catch reports. (i) The owner or operator of a limited access or LAGC scallop vessel with an IFQ permit that fishes for, possesses, or retains scallops, and is not fishing under a NE Multispecies DAS or sector allocation, must submit reports through the VMS, in accordance with instructions to be provided by the Regional Administrator, for each day fished, including open area trips, access area trips as described in Sec. 648.59(b)(9), Northern Gulf of Maine RSA trips, and trips accompanied by a NMFS-approved observer. The reports must be submitted for each day (beginning at 0000 hr and ending at 2400 hr) and not later than 0900 hr of the following day. Such reports must include the following information: (A) VTR serial number; (B) Date fish were caught; (C) Total pounds of scallop meats kept; (D) Total pounds of all fish kept. * * * * * 0 3. In Sec. 648.14: 0 a. Revise paragraphs (i)(1)(iii)(A)(1)(ii) and (iv), and (i)(1)(viii)(A) and (B); 0 b. Add paragraph (i)(2)(iii)(E); and 0 c. Revise paragraphs (i)(3)(iii)(C) and(D). The revisions and additions read as follows: Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions. * * * * * (i) * * * (1) * * * (iii) * * * (A) * * * (1) * * * (ii) The scallops were harvested by a vessel that has been issued and carries on board a limited access scallop permit and is properly declared into the scallop DAS, Area Access program, or the NGOM management area. * * * * * (iv) The scallops were harvested by a vessel that has been issued and carries on board an NGOM or IFQ scallop permit, and is properly declared into the NGOM scallop management area, and the LAGC portion of the NGOM TAC specified in Sec. 648.62 has not been harvested. * * * * * (viii) Scallop research. (A) Fail to comply with any of the provisions specified in Sec. 648.56 or the conditions of a letter of authorization issued under Sec. 648.56. (B) Fish for scallops in, or possess or land scallops from the NGOM, unless allocated NGOM RSA allocation as described in Sec. 648.56(d) and fishing on a scallop research set aside compensation trip. * * * * * (2) * * * (iii) * * * (E) Fish for, possess, or land scallops from the NGOM, unless on a scallop RSA compensation trip and allocated NGOM RSA allocation as described in Sec. 648.56(d). * * * * * (3) * * * (iii) * * * (C) Declare into the NGOM scallop management area after the effective date of a notification published in the Federal Register stating that the LAGC portion of the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been harvested as specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel is fishing exclusively in state waters, declared a state-waters only NGOM trip, and is participating in an approved state waters exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54, or unless the vessel is participating in the scallop RSA program as specified in Sec. 648.56. (D) Fish for, possess, or land scallops in or from the NGOM scallop management area after the effective date of a notification published in the Federal Register that the LAGC portion of the NGOM scallop management area TAC has been harvested, as specified in Sec. 648.62, unless the vessel possesses or lands scallops that were harvested south of 42[deg]20' N lat., the vessel is transiting the NGOM scallop management area, and the vessel's fishing gear is properly stowed and not available for immediate use in accordance with Sec. 648.2 or unless the vessel is fishing exclusively in state waters, declared a state-waters only NGOM trip, and is participating in an approved state waters exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54, or [[Page 7134]] unless the vessel is participating in the scallop RSA program as specified in Sec. 648.56. * * * * * Subpart D--Management Measures for the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery 0 4. In Sec. 648.56 revise paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows: Sec. 648.56 Scallop research. * * * * * (c) NOAA shall make the final determination as to what proposals are approved and which vessels are authorized to take scallops in excess of possession limits, or take additional trips into Open, Access Areas, or the NGOM management area. NMFS shall provide authorization of such activities to specific vessels by letter of acknowledgement, letter of authorization, or Exempted Fishing Permit issued by the Regional Administrator, which must be kept on board the vessel. (d) Available RSA allocation shall be 1.25 million lb (567 mt) annually, which shall be deducted from the ABC/ACL specified in Sec. 648.53(a) prior to setting ACLs for the limited access and LAGC fleets, as specified in Sec. 648.53(a)(3) and (4), respectively. Approved RSA projects shall be allocated an amount of scallop pounds that can be harvested in open areas, available access areas, and the NGOM. The specific access areas that are open to RSA harvest and the amount of NGOM allocation to be landed through RSA harvest shall be specified through the framework process as identified in Sec. 648.59(e)(1). In a year in which a framework adjustment is under review by the Council and/or NMFS, NMFS shall make RSA awards prior to approval of the framework, if practicable, based on total scallop pounds needed to fund each research project. Recipients may begin compensation fishing in open areas prior to approval of the framework, or wait until NMFS approval of the framework to begin compensation fishing within approved access areas. * * * * * 0 5. In Sec. 648.62: 0 a. Revise paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(4), (b), (c), and (d); and 0 b. Add paragraph (a)(5). The addition and revisions to read as follows: Sec. 648.62 Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) Management Program. (a) * * * (2) Scallop landings by vessels issued NGOM permits shall be deducted from the LAGC portion of the NGOM scallop total allowable catch when vessels fished all or part of a trip in the Federal waters portion of the NGOM. If a vessel with a NGOM scallop permit fishes exclusively in state waters within the NGOM, scallop landings from those trips will not be deducted from the Federal NGOM quota. (3) Scallop landings by all vessels issued LAGC IFQ scallop permits and fishing in the NGOM scallop management area shall be deducted from the LAGC portion of the NGOM scallop total allowable catch specified in the specifications or framework adjustment processes defined in Sec. 648.55. Scallop landings by LAGC IFQ scallop vessels fishing in the NGOM scallop management area shall be deducted from their respective scallop IFQs. Landings by incidental catch scallop vessels shall not be deducted from the NGOM total allowable catch specified in paragraph (b) of this section. (4) A vessel issued a NGOM or LAGC IFQ scallop permit that fishes in the NGOM may fish for, possess, or retain up to 200 lb (90.7 kg) of shucked or 25 bu (8.81 hL) of in-shell scallops, and may possess up to 50 bu (17.6 hL) of in-shell scallops seaward of the VMS Demarcation Line. A vessel issued an incidental catch general category scallop permit that fishes in the NGOM may fish for, possess, or retain only up to 40 lb of shucked or 5 U.S. bu (1.76 hL) of in-shell scallops, and may possess up to 10 bu (3.52 hL) of in-shell scallops seaward of the VMS Demarcation Line. (5) Scallop landings by all vessels issued scallop permits and fishing in the NGOM under the scallop RSA program (as specified in Sec. 648.56) shall be deducted from the limited access portion of the NGOM scallop total allowable catch. (b) Total allowable catch. The total allowable catch for the NGOM scallop management area shall be specified through the framework adjustment process. The total allowable catch for the NGOM scallop management area shall be based on the Federal portion of the scallop resource in the NGOM. The total allowable catch shall be determined by historical landings until additional information on the NGOM scallop resource is available, for example through an NGOM resource survey and assessment. The ABC/ACL as defined in Sec. 648.53(a) shall not include the total allowable catch for the NGOM scallop management area, and landings from the NGOM scallop management area shall not be counted against the ABC/ACL defined in Sec. 648.53(a). The total allowable catch shall be divided between the limited access and the LAGC fleets. (1) NGOM annual hard TACs. The LAGC and the limited access portions of the annual hard TAC for the NGOM 2018 and 2019 fishing years are as follows: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2018 2019 (default) Fleet --------------------------------------------------------------- lb kg lb kg ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAGC............................................ 135,000 61,235 102,500 46,493 Limited access.................................. 65,000 29,484 32,500 14,742 --------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................................... 200,000 90,718 135,000 61,235 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Unless a vessel has fished for scallops outside of the NGOM scallop management area and is transiting the NGOM scallop management area with all fishing gear stowed and not available for immediate use as defined in Sec. 648.2, no vessel issued an LAGC or limited access scallop permit pursuant to Sec. 648.4(a)(2) may possess, retain, or land scallops in the NGOM scallop management area once the Regional Administrator has provided notification in the Federal Register that the vessel's respective portion(s) of the NGOM scallop total allowable catch in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) has been reached, unless the vessel is participating in the scallop RSA program as specified in Sec. 648.56, has been allocated NGOM RSA pounds, and the limited access portion of the NGOM TAC has not been reached. Once the NGOM hard TAC is reached, a vessel issued a NGOM permit may no longer declare a state-only NGOM scallop trip and fish for scallops exclusively in state waters within the NGOM, unless [[Page 7135]] participating in the state waters exemption program as specified in Sec. 648.54. A vessel that has not been issued a Federal scallop permit that fishes exclusively in state waters is not subject to the closure of the NGOM scallop management area. (3) If either the LAGC or the limited access portion of the annual NGOM TAC is exceeded, the amount of NGOM scallop landings in excess of the portion of the TAC specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall be deducted from the respective portion(s) of the NGOM TAC which has been exceeded for the subsequent fishing year, as soon as practicable, once scallop landings data for the NGOM management area is available. (c) VMS requirements. Except scallop vessels issued a limited access scallop permit pursuant to Sec. 648.4(a)(2)(i) that have declared a NGOM trip under the scallop RSA program, a vessel issued a scallop permit pursuant to Sec. 648.4(a)(2) that intends to fish for scallops in the NGOM scallop management area or fishes for, possesses, or lands scallops in or from the NGOM scallop management area, must declare a NGOM scallop management area trip and report scallop catch through the vessel's VMS unit, as required in Sec. 648.10. If the vessel has a NGOM permit, the vessel must declare either a Federal NGOM trip or a state-waters NGOM trip. If a vessel intends to fish any part of a NGOM trip in Federal NGOM waters, it may not declare into the state water NGOM fishery. (d) Gear restrictions. Except scallop vessels issued a limited access scallop permit pursuant to Sec. 648.4(a)(2)(i) that have properly declared a NGOM trip under the scallop RSA program, the combined dredge width in use by, or in possession on board, LAGC scallop vessels fishing in the NGOM scallop management area may not exceed 10.5 ft (3.2 m), measured at the widest point in the bail of the dredge. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-03319 Filed 2-16-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules 7129
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION guidance on making effective references and state-specific
AGENCY comments, please visit https:// requirements that differ from the federal
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa- rule, which EPA has preliminarily
40 CFR Part 257 dockets. determined to be at least as protective
[EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0613; FRL–9974– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: as the federal criteria. EPA’s analysis
49–OLEM] Mary Jackson, Materials Recovery and and preliminary findings are available
Waste Management Division, Office of in the docket supporting this proposed
Oklahoma: Approval of Coal Resource Conservation and Recovery, action.
Combustion Residuals State Permit Mail code 5304P, U.S. Environmental The notice announcing the proposed
Program; Extension of Comment Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania approval of Oklahoma’s application was
Period Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; published on January 16, 2018, and the
telephone number: (703) 308–8453; comment period was scheduled to end
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
email address: jackson.mary@epa.gov. on March 2, 2018. See 83 FR 2100.
Agency (EPA).
Since publication of the notice, a
ACTION: Notice of availability; extension SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is
number of stakeholders have requested
of comment period. proposing to approve Oklahoma’s CCR
additional time to review Oklahoma’s
state permit program application,
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection application and to develop and submit
pursuant to RCRA 4005(d)(1)(B). If
Agency (EPA or the Agency) is comments. Therefore, after considering
approved, the Oklahoma Department of
extending the comment period on EPA’s this request for additional time, EPA has
Environmental Quality (ODEQ)’s permit
proposal to approve Oklahoma’s Coal decided to extend the comment period
program would operate ‘‘in lieu of’’ the
Combustion Residuals (CCR) State until March 19, 2018.
federal CCR program, codified at 40 CFR
Permit Program. The notice announcing part 257, subpart D. Dated: February 8, 2018.
this proposed approval was published On July 31, 2017 Oklahoma submitted Barry N. Breen,
on January 16, 2018, and the public to EPA its initial application. The State Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
comment period was scheduled to end supplemented its original application Office of Land and Emergency Management.
on March 2, 2018. However, a number on October 18, 2017. EPA determined [FR Doc. 2018–03274 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
of public interest groups have requested that the application was complete and BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
additional time to review Oklahoma’s notified Oklahoma of its determination
application for a CCR State Permit by letter dated December 21, 2017.
Program and to develop and submit The statute requires EPA to evaluate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
comments. Therefore, in response to the two components of a state program to
request for additional time, EPA is determine whether it meets the standard National Oceanic and Atmospheric
extending the comment period, so that for approval. First, EPA is to evaluate Administration
comments are now due on or before the adequacy of the permit program (or
March 19, 2018. other system of prior approval and 50 CFR Part 648
DATES: Comments on the notice of conditions) itself. See 42 U.S.C. [Docket No.: 180110025–8025–01]
availability published January 16, 2018 6945(d)(1)(A). Second, EPA is to
(83 FR 2100) must be received on or evaluate the adequacy of the technical RIN 0648–BH51
before March 19, 2018. criteria that will be included in each
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, permit, to determine whether they are Fisheries of the Northeastern United
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– the same as the federal criteria, or to the States; Northern Gulf of Maine
OLEM–2017–0613; Title: Oklahoma: extent they differ, whether the modified Measures in Framework Adjustment 29
Approval of Coal Combustion Residuals criteria are ‘‘at least as protective as’’ the to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery
State Permit Program at https:// federal requirements. See 42 U.S.C. Management Plan
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 6945(d)(1)(B). Only if both components AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
instructions for submitting comments. meet the statutory requirements may Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Once submitted, comments cannot be EPA approve the program. See 42 U.S.C. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 6945(d)(1). Commerce.
The EPA may publish any comment On that basis, EPA conducted an ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
received to its public docket. Do not analysis of ODEQ’s application, comments.
submit electronically any information including a thorough analysis of OAC
you consider to be Confidential 252:517 and its adoption of 40 CFR part SUMMARY: NMFS proposes some of the
Business Information (CBI) or other 257, subpart D. Based on this analysis, measures included in Framework
information whose disclosure is EPA has preliminarily determined that Adjustment 29 to the Atlantic Sea
restricted by statute. Multimedia ODEQ’s submitted CCR permit program Scallop Fishery Management Plan that
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be meets the standard for approval in establish scallop specifications and
accompanied by a written comment. section 4005(d)(1)(A) and (B). EPA is other measures for the Northern Gulf of
The written comment is considered the therefore proposing to approve Maine scallop management area for
official comment and should include Oklahoma’s application. Oklahoma’s fishing years 2018 and 2019. This action
discussion of all points you wish to program contains all the elements of the is necessary to prevent overfishing and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
make. EPA will generally not consider federal rule, including requirements for improve both yield-per-recruit and the
comments or comment contents located location restrictions, design and overall management of the Atlantic sea
outside of the primary submission (i.e., operating criteria, groundwater scallop resource in the Northern Gulf of
on the web, cloud or other file sharing monitoring and corrective action, Maine. The intended effect of this rule
system). For additional submission closure requirements and post-closure is to notify the public of these proposed
methods, the full EPA public comment care, recordkeeping, notification and measures and to solicit comment on the
policy, information about CBI or internet posting requirements. It also potential scallop fishery management
multimedia submissions, and general contains state-specific language, changes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7163/page/1.svg)
![7130 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules
DATES: Comments must be received by be publicly accessible. NMFS will This resulted in total landings from the
March 7, 2018. accept anonymous comments (enter z NGOM by the limited access fleet that
ADDRESSES: The New England Fishery ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish far exceeded the total allowable catch
Management Council has prepared a to remain anonymous). (TAC) for the limited access general
draft environmental assessment (EA) for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: category (LAGC) fleet. The Council felt
this action that describes the proposed Travis Ford, Fishery Policy Analyst, that this was inconsistent with the goals
measures, other considered alternatives, 978–281–9233. of the NGOM management program.
and analyzes the impacts of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Accordingly, the Council developed
proposed measures and alternatives. Framework 29, in part, to put measures
The Council submitted a decision draft Background in place to temporarily divide the catch
of the framework to NMFS that includes The scallop fishery’s management more equitably between the two fleets
the draft EA, a description of the unit ranges from the shorelines of Maine and limit the total catch by the limited
Council’s preferred alternatives, the through North Carolina to the outer access fleet from the NGOM to a level
Council’s rationale for selecting each boundary of the Exclusive Economic consistent with its specified TAC for the
alternative, and an Initial Regulatory Zone. The Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery NGOM.
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA). Copies of Management Plan (FMP), established in Prior to its approval of Framework 29
the decision draft of Framework 1982, includes a number of amendments at its December meeting, the Council
Adjustment 29, the draft EA, and the and framework adjustments that have raised concerns regarding the
IRFA, are available upon request from revised and refined the fishery’s complexity of Framework 29 and the
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, management. The New England Fishery timeline for implementation.
New England Fishery Management Management Council sets scallop Specifically, the Council was concerned
Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport, fishery catch limits and other that if the NGOM measures in
MA 01950. management measures through Framework 29 are not in place by April
You may submit comments on this specification or framework adjustments 1, 2018, the limited access fleet could
document, identified by NOAA–NMFS– that occur annually or biennially. The exceed its portion of the total allowable
2018–0007, by either of the following Council adopted Framework catch (TAC) proposed in the framework,
methods: Adjustment 29 (Framework 29) to the potentially undermining the
• Electronic Submission: Submit all Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP in its entirety sustainability of the NGOM fishery in at
electronic public comments via the on December 7, 2017, and submitted a least the short term. We informed the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to decision draft of the framework, Council at the December meeting that
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= including a draft EA, to NMFS on we would consider separating out the
NOAA-NMFS-2018-0007, click the December 21, 2017, for review and NGOM measures in Framework 29 to
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the approval. Framework 29 includes catch, ensure that they were in place prior to
required fields, and enter or attach your effort, and quota allocations and April 1, 2018. To help prevent excessive
comments. adjustments to the rotational area fishing in the NGOM, we are separating
• Mail: Regional Administrator, management program for fishing year out the NGOM measures in Framework
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional 2018 and default specifications for 29 to expedite their implementation. As
Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic fishing year 2019. a result, this action addresses only the
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the This action proposes the portion of portions of Framework 29 that affect
outside of the envelope, ‘‘Comments on Framework 29 that establishes scallop fishing in the NGOM. We will address
Northern Gulf of Maine Measures in specifications and other measures for the remaining specifications and other
Framework Adjustment 29.’’ the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) management measure in Framework 29
Instructions: Comments sent by any scallop management area for fishing in a follow-up action.
other method, to any other address or years 2018 and 2019. These measures This action would set new
individual, or received after the end of were developed to address harvesting management measures in the NGOM for
the comment period, may not be activities by the limited access fleet in the scallop fishery for the 2018 and
considered by NMFS. All comments the past two years. In fishing years 2016 2019 fishing years, including
received are a part of the public record and 2017, the limited access fleet prohibiting the limited access fleet from
and will generally be posted for public harvested substantially more scallops accessing the NGOM while participating
viewing on www.regulations.gov from the NGOM than they had since the in the DAS program. In addition, this
without change. All personal identifying beginning of the NGOM management action would divide the annual NGOM
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), program. Because the limited access TAC between the limited access fleet
confidential business information, or fleet accessed the NGOM through the while on a research set-aside (RSA) trip
otherwise sensitive information days-at-sea (DAS) program, there was no and LAGC fleets for the 2018 and 2019
submitted voluntarily by the sender will hard limit on its landings from the area. (default) fishing years as follows:
TABLE 1—NGOM TAC FOR FISHING YEARS 2018 AND 2019
[Default]
2018 2019 (default)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Fleet
lb kg lb kg
LAGC ............................................................................................................... 135,000 61,235 102,500 46,493
Limited access ................................................................................................. 65,000 29,484 32,500 14,742
Total .......................................................................................................... 200,000 90,718 135,000 61,235
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7163/page/2.svg)
![7132 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules
in the sea scallop fishery. No vessels considered a separate ‘‘ownership NGOM: Alternative 1 (No Action,
were issued occasional scallop permits. entity’’ for the purpose of this analysis. 95,000 lb (43,091 kg) TAC and no
NMFS issued 225 LAGC IFQ permits in On June 1 of each year, ownership changes to management), Alternative 2
2016, and 125 of these vessels actively entities are identified based on a list of (Set NGOM TAC using exploitable
fished for scallops that year. The all permits for the most recent complete biomass projections for 2018 and 2019,
remaining permit holders likely leased calendar year. The current ownership cap removals for all fishery components,
out scallop IFQ allocations with their dataset is based on the calendar year and apply limited access share of TAC
permits in Confirmation of Permit 2016 permits and contains average gross toward RSA compensation fishing), and
History. In 2016, there were 27 NGOM sales associated with those permits for Alternative 3 (Set NGOM TAC at 0 lb (0
vessels that actively fished. calendar years 2014 through 2016. kg)). Under the Council’s preferred
For RFA purposes, NMFS defines a Matching the potentially impacted 2016 alternative, Alternative 2, there were
small business in shellfish fishery as a fishing year permits described above two options for setting the TAC and
firm that is independently owned and (limited access permits and LAGC IFQ each of these options had two sub-
operated with receipts of less than $11 permits) to calendar year 2016 options for splitting the TAC between
million annually (see 50 CFR 200.2). ownership data results in 161 distinct the limited access and the LAGC fleets.
Individually-permitted vessels may hold ownership entities for the limited access Option 1 (setting that TAC based on F
permits for several fisheries, harvesting fleet and 115 distinct ownership entities = 0.15) included these two sub-options
species of fish that are regulated by for the LAGC IFQ fleet. Of these, and to split the TAC: Sub-option 1
several different fishery management based on the Small Business (allocating the first 70,000 lb (31,751 kg)
plans, even beyond those impacted by Administration guidelines, 154 of the to LAGC fleet and the remaining TAC is
this proposed rule. Furthermore, limited access distinct ownership split equally), and sub-option 2 (first
multiple permitted vessels and/or entities and 113 of the LAGC IFQ 95,000 lb (43,091 kg) to LAGC fleet and
permits may be owned by entities with entities are categorized as small. The the remaining TAC is split 25(LAGC)/
various personal and business remaining seven of the limited access 75(limited access)). These two sub-
affiliations. For the purposes of this and two of the LAGC IFQ entities are options are described in Table 2. Under
analysis, ‘‘ownership entities’’ are categorized as large entities. The these sub-options scallop revenues and
defined as those entities with common number of distinct small business net revenues of the small business
ownership as listed on the permit entities with NGOM permits and active entities for the NGOM vessels would
application. Only permits with identical NGOM vessels were 27 in 2016 permits. increase relative to No Action levels
ownership are categorized as an ranging from 19 percent to 27 percent.
Description of Significant Alternatives However, the preferred alternative
‘‘ownership entity.’’ For example, if five
to the Proposed Action Which (Alternative 2, Option 2, Sub-Option 1)
permits have the same seven persons
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of would result in the highest economic
listed as co-owners on their permit
Applicable Statutes and Which benefits for this fishery with an
applications, those seven persons would
Minimize any Significant Economic estimated increase in net revenues by 42
form one ‘‘ownership entity,’’ that holds
Impact on Small Entities percent compared to both Alternative 1
those five permits. If two of those seven
owners also co-own additional vessels, The Council considered three (No Action) and Alternative 3 (Set
that ownership arrangement would be alternatives for setting a TAC in the NGOM TAC at 0 lb (0 kg)).
TABLE 2—IMPACTS OF THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 2 FOR NGOM SCALLOP FISHERY
[2018 Fishing Year]
Option 1 (F = 0.15) Option 2 (F = 0.18)—Preferred
Split Sub-Option 1 (70,000 lb (31,751 kg) then 50/50) Preferred
LA scallop pounds .............................................. 47500 lb (21546 kg) ......................................... 65000 lb (29,484 kg)
LAGC scallop pounds ........................................ 117500 lb (53297 kg) ....................................... 135000 lb (61,235 kg)
Total Pounds ...................................................... 165000 lb (74843 kg) ....................................... 200000 lb (90,718 kg)
Net revenue (in 2017 Mill. $) .............................. 1.13 .................................................................. 1.29
Net Revenue under No Action (Alternative 1, in 0.91 .................................................................. 0.91
2017 Mill. $).
Percent Change in net revenue per vessel and 24 percent ........................................................ 42 percent
per business entity.
Split Sub-Option 2 (95,000 lb (43,091 kg) then 25/75)
LA scallop pounds .............................................. 52,500 lb (23,814 kg) ....................................... 78,750 lb (35,720 kg)
LAGC scallop pounds ........................................ 112,500 lb (51,029 kg) ..................................... 121,250 lb (54,998 kg)
Total Pounds ...................................................... 16,5000 lb (74,843 kg) ..................................... 200,000 lb (90,718 kg)
Estimated LA RSA value .................................... $643,125 .......................................................... $964,687.5
Estimated LAGC scallop revenue ...................... $1,378,125 ....................................................... $1,485,313
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
net revenue ( 2017 Mill. $) ................................. 1.08 .................................................................. 1.16
Net Revenue under No Action (Alternative 1, in 0.91 .................................................................. 0.91
2017 Mill. $)).
Percent Change in net revenue ......................... 19 percent ........................................................ 27 percent
The economic impacts of the limited access vessels could range, In both 2016 and 2017, limited access
preferred NGOM alternative on the however, from low negative to neutral. vessels were active in the NGOM
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7163/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Proposed Rules 7135
participating in the state waters for the NGOM management area is waters NGOM trip. If a vessel intends to
exemption program as specified in available. fish any part of a NGOM trip in Federal
§ 648.54. A vessel that has not been (c) VMS requirements. Except scallop NGOM waters, it may not declare into
issued a Federal scallop permit that vessels issued a limited access scallop the state water NGOM fishery.
fishes exclusively in state waters is not permit pursuant to § 648.4(a)(2)(i) that (d) Gear restrictions. Except scallop
subject to the closure of the NGOM have declared a NGOM trip under the vessels issued a limited access scallop
scallop management area. scallop RSA program, a vessel issued a permit pursuant to § 648.4(a)(2)(i) that
scallop permit pursuant to § 648.4(a)(2) have properly declared a NGOM trip
(3) If either the LAGC or the limited under the scallop RSA program, the
access portion of the annual NGOM that intends to fish for scallops in the
NGOM scallop management area or combined dredge width in use by, or in
TAC is exceeded, the amount of NGOM possession on board, LAGC scallop
fishes for, possesses, or lands scallops in
scallop landings in excess of the portion vessels fishing in the NGOM scallop
or from the NGOM scallop management
of the TAC specified in paragraph (b)(1) management area may not exceed 10.5
area, must declare a NGOM scallop
of this section shall be deducted from management area trip and report scallop ft (3.2 m), measured at the widest point
the respective portion(s) of the NGOM catch through the vessel’s VMS unit, as in the bail of the dredge.
TAC which has been exceeded for the required in § 648.10. If the vessel has a * * * * *
subsequent fishing year, as soon as NGOM permit, the vessel must declare [FR Doc. 2018–03319 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
practicable, once scallop landings data either a Federal NGOM trip or a state- BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM 20FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7163/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-17 02:29:16
Document Modified: 2018-02-17 02:29:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule; request for comments. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by March 7, 2018. | |
| Contact | Travis Ford, Fishery Policy Analyst, 978-281-9233. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 7129 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-BH51 | |
| CFR Associated | Fisheries; Fishing and Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR