83_FR_7187 83 FR 7153 - Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision

83 FR 7153 - Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 34 (February 20, 2018)

Page Range7153-7154
FR Document2018-03375

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the Court of International Trade's (CIT or the Court) final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final scope ruling and is, therefore, finding that certain black, circular tubing produced to ASTM A-513 specifications by Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) is not within the scope of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Mexico.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018) 
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7153-7154]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-805]


Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Notice 
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of 
Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public 
that the Court of International Trade's (CIT or the Court) final 
judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final scope 
ruling and is, therefore, finding that certain black, circular tubing 
produced to ASTM A-513 specifications by Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. 
(Maquilacero) is not within the scope of the antidumping duty order on 
circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Mexico.

DATES: Applicable Date: February 19, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 27, 2015, Commerce issued the Maquilacero Scope Ruling,\1\ 
in which it determined, under 19 CFR 351.225(k)(1), that 46 products 
produced by Maquilacero to specification A-513 did not meet the 
exclusion for ``mechanical tubing'' in the scope of the Order,\2\ and 
were, therefore, within the scope of the Order. In particular, Commerce 
relied upon a prior scope ruling pertaining to certain mechanical 
tubing products produced by Productos Laminados de Monterrey, S.A. de 
C.V., and Prolamsa, Inc. (Prolamsa), which was conducted under 19 CFR 
351.225(k)(2), and which defined ``mechanical tubing'' as tubing that 
met a variety of physical, chemical, and mechanical characteristics, 
and was stenciled.\3\ Commerce found that Maquilacero's tubing was not 
stenciled, and, thus, was not ``mechanical tubing.'' \4\ Maquilacero 
challenged Commerce's final scope ruling before the CIT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Memorandum, ``Final Scope Ruling on Certain Black, 
Circular Tubing Produced to ASTM A-513 Specifications by Maquilacero 
S.A. de C.V.,'' dated July 27, 2015 (Maquilacero Scope Ruling).
    \2\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Circular 
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, the Republic of Korea 
(Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela and Amendment to Final Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Welded Non-Alloy Steel 
Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 1992) (the Order).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Final Scope Ruling on Certain Black, 
Circular Tubing Produced to ASTM A-513 Specifications by Productos 
Laminados de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V., and Prolamsa, Inc.,'' dated 
January 12, 2015 (Prolamsa Final Scope Ruling).
    \4\ See Maquilacero Scope Ruling.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 30, 2017, the Court remanded the Maquilacero Scope Ruling 
to Commerce.\5\ Specifically, the Court held that Commerce did not 
``properly consider how the mention of stenciling came to be found in 
the ruling excluding Prolamsa's pipe from the Order,'' particularly 
given that stenciling ``does not change the inherent quality or the 
intended use of the product.'' \6\ As such, the Court concluded that 
``the imposition of a requirement {(i.e., stenciling){time}  having 
nothing to do with the physical characteristics of mechanical tubing 
and that appeared in the Prolamsa Final Scope Ruling by chance { 
{time}  was unreasonable.'' \7\ Thus, the Court found ``that Commerce's 
ruling unlawfully expanded the scope of the Order to include 
{Maquilacero{time} 's merchandise,'' \8\ and remanded the Final Scope 
Ruling to Commerce to ``(1) not impose a stenciling requirement, and 
(2) find that Maquilacero's tubing is excluded from the Order based on 
its analysis found on pages 6-9 of the Final Scope Ruling.'' \9\ In 
particular, the Court instructed Commerce to ``find plaintiff's 
products are excluded from the Order using the same analysis in the 
Final Scope Ruling and that is found in this opinion.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Slip Op. 17-
117, Court No. 15-00287 (CIT 2017).
    \6\ See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17-117, at 29.
    \7\ See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17-117, at 32.
    \8\ Id., at 26.
    \9\ See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17-117, at 32-33.
    \10\ Id., at 33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the Court's instructions, Commerce issued the Final 
Remand

[[Page 7154]]

Results.\11\ Consistent with the Court's instructions, Commerce found 
that the 46 products included in Maquilacero's scope ruling request are 
excluded from the Order, because those products meet all physical, 
chemical, and mechanical properties of mechanical tubing, 
notwithstanding that the products are not stenciled. On February 9, 
2018, the Court sustained Commerce's Final Remand Results in their 
entirety.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand in 
Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Ct. No. 15-00287, 
November 27, 2017 (Final Remand Results).
    \12\ See Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Slip Op. 18-
8, Court No. 15-00287 (CIT 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\13\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\14\ the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the 
Act, Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not 
``in harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend 
liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The 
CIT's February 9, 2018, judgment in Maquilacero, sustaining Commerce's 
decision in the Final Remand Results that the 46 products included in 
Maquilacero's scope ruling request are excluded from the Order 
constitutes a final decision of the court that is not in harmony with 
the Maquilacero Scope Ruling. This notice is published in fulfillment 
of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, Commerce will 
continue the suspension of liquidation of the 46 products at issue 
pending expiration of the period to appeal or, if appealed, pending a 
final and conclusive court decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken), at 341.
    \14\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 20 10) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Scope Ruling

    Because there is now a final court decision with respect to the 
Maquilacero Scope Ruling, Commerce is amending its final scope ruling. 
Commerce finds that the scope of the Order does not cover the products 
addressed in the Maquilacero Scope Ruling. Commerce will instruct U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that the cash deposit rate will be 
zero percent for the 46 products subject to Maquilacero's scope ruling 
request. In the event that the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or if 
appealed, upheld by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 
entries of the 46 products at issue without regard to antidumping and/
or countervailing duties, and to lift suspension of liquidation of such 
entries.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 13, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing 
the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-03375 Filed 2-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices 7153 Dated: February 9, 2018. 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, therefore, within the scope of the Order. James Maeder, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060, In particular, Commerce relied upon a Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 7305.19.5000, 7305.31.4000, 7305.31.6010, prior scope ruling pertaining to certain Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and 7305.39.5000. While the HTSUS subheadings mechanical tubing products produced Operations, performing the duties of Deputy by Productos Laminados de Monterrey, Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the S.A. de C.V., and Prolamsa, Inc. Countervailing Duty Operations. scope of these investigations is dispositive. (Prolamsa), which was conducted under Appendix [FR Doc. 2018–03304 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am] 19 CFR 351.225(k)(2), and which Scope of the Investigations BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P defined ‘‘mechanical tubing’’ as tubing that met a variety of physical, chemical, The merchandise covered by these investigations is welded carbon and alloy and mechanical characteristics, and was steel pipe, more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE stenciled.3 Commerce found that in nominal outside diameter (large diameter Maquilacero’s tubing was not stenciled, welded pipe), regardless of wall thickness, International Trade Administration and, thus, was not ‘‘mechanical length, surface finish, grade, end finish, or tubing.’’ 4 Maquilacero challenged stenciling. Large diameter welded pipe may [A–201–805] Commerce’s final scope ruling before be used to transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other fluids, liquids, or gases. It may also be Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy the CIT. used for structural purposes, including, but Steel Pipe From Mexico: Notice of On August 30, 2017, the Court not limited to, piling. Specifically, not Court Decision Not in Harmony With remanded the Maquilacero Scope included is large diameter welded pipe Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Ruling to Commerce.5 Specifically, the produced only to specifications of the Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant American Water Works Association (AWWA) Court held that Commerce did not to Court Decision ‘‘properly consider how the mention of for water and sewage pipe. Large diameter welded pipe used to AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, stenciling came to be found in the ruling transport oil, gas, or natural gas liquids is International Trade Administration, excluding Prolamsa’s pipe from the normally produced to the American Department of Commerce. Order,’’ particularly given that Petroleum Institute (API) specification 5L. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce stenciling ‘‘does not change the inherent Large diameter welded pipe may also be quality or the intended use of the (Commerce) is notifying the public that produced to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards A500, A252, the Court of International Trade’s (CIT product.’’ 6 As such, the Court or A53, or other relevant domestic or the Court) final judgment in this case concluded that ‘‘the imposition of a specifications, grades and/or standards. Large is not in harmony with Commerce’s requirement {(i.e., stenciling)} having diameter welded pipe can be produced to final scope ruling and is, therefore, nothing to do with the physical comparable foreign specifications, grades finding that certain black, circular characteristics of mechanical tubing and and/or standards or to proprietary tubing produced to ASTM A–513 that appeared in the Prolamsa Final specifications, grades and/or standards, or specifications by Maquilacero S.A. de Scope Ruling by chance { } was can be non-graded material. All pipe meeting C.V. (Maquilacero) is not within the the physical description set forth above is unreasonable.’’ 7 Thus, the Court found scope of the antidumping duty order on ‘‘that Commerce’s ruling unlawfully covered by the scope of these investigations, whether or not produced according to a circular welded non-alloy steel pipe expanded the scope of the Order to particular standard. from Mexico. include {Maquilacero}’s Subject merchandise also includes large DATES: Applicable Date: February 19, merchandise,’’ 8 and remanded the Final diameter welded pipe that has been further 2018. Scope Ruling to Commerce to ‘‘(1) not processed in a third country, including but impose a stenciling requirement, and (2) not limited to coating, painting, notching, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: beveling, cutting, punching, welding, or any Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, find that Maquilacero’s tubing is other processing that would not otherwise Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, excluded from the Order based on its remove the merchandise from the scope of International Trade Administration, analysis found on pages 6–9 of the Final the investigations if performed in the country U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Scope Ruling.’’ 9 In particular, the Court of manufacture of the in-scope large diameter Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, instructed Commerce to ‘‘find plaintiff’s welded pipe. DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6312. products are excluded from the Order Excluded from the scope are any products SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: using the same analysis in the Final covered by the existing antidumping duty orders on welded line pipe from the Republic Scope Ruling and that is found in this Background opinion.’’ 10 of Korea, welded line pipe from the Republic of Turkey, and welded ASTM A–312 On July 27, 2015, Commerce issued Pursuant to the Court’s instructions, stainless steel pipe from Korea, as well as any the Maquilacero Scope Ruling,1 in Commerce issued the Final Remand products covered by the existing which it determined, under 19 CFR countervailing duty order on welded line 351.225(k)(1), that 46 products pipe from Turkey. See Welded Line Pipe from Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea, 57 FR 49453 produced by Maquilacero to (November 2, 1992) (the Order). the Republic of Korea and the Republic of specification A–513 did not meet the 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Scope Ruling on Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056 (December 1, 2015); Welded ASTM A– exclusion for ‘‘mechanical tubing’’ in Certain Black, Circular Tubing Produced to ASTM the scope of the Order,2 and were, A–513 Specifications by Productos Laminados de 312 Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea: Monterrey, S.A. de C.V., and Prolamsa, Inc.,’’ dated Antidumping Duty Order, 57 FR 62300 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES January 12, 2015 (Prolamsa Final Scope Ruling). 1 See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Scope Ruling on (December 30, 1992); and Welded Line Pipe 4 See Maquilacero Scope Ruling. from the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Certain Black, Circular Tubing Produced to ASTM 5 See Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, A–513 Specifications by Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.,’’ Duty Order, 80 FR 75054 (December 1, 2015). dated July 27, 2015 (Maquilacero Scope Ruling). Slip Op. 17–117, Court No. 15–00287 (CIT 2017). The large diameter welded pipe that is 2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 6 See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17–117, at 29. subject to these investigations is currently Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Brazil, 7 See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17–117, at 32. classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff the Republic of Korea (Korea), Mexico, and 8 Id., at 26. Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under Venezuela and Amendment to Final Determination 9 See Maquilacero, Slip Op. 17–117, at 32–33. subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Welded 10 Id., at 33. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1

7154 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices Results.11 Consistent with the Court’s and/or countervailing duties, and to lift accompanied by countervailing duty instructions, Commerce found that the suspension of liquidation of such (CVD) Petitions concerning imports of 46 products included in Maquilacero’s entries. welded pipe from China, India, Korea, scope ruling request are excluded from and Turkey. The petitioners are Notification to Interested Parties the Order, because those products meet domestic producers of welded pipe.2 all physical, chemical, and mechanical This notice is issued and published in Commerce exercised its discretion to properties of mechanical tubing, accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), toll all deadlines affected by the closure notwithstanding that the products are 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. of the Federal Government from January not stenciled. On February 9, 2018, the Dated: February 13, 2018. 20 through 22, 2018. If the new deadline Court sustained Commerce’s Final Christian Marsh, falls on a non-business day, in Remand Results in their entirety.12 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement accordance with Commerce’s practice, and Compliance, performing the non- the deadline will become the next Timken Notice exclusive functions and duties of the business day. The revised deadline for In its decision in Timken,13 as Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the initiation of these investigations is clarified by Diamond Sawblades,14 the Compliance. now February 9, 2018.3 United States Court of Appeals for the [FR Doc. 2018–03375 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am] On January 23, 24, 29, 30, and Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P February 6, 2018, Commerce requested pursuant to sections 516A(c) and (e) of supplemental information pertaining to the Act, Commerce must publish a certain areas of the Petitions.4 The notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE harmony’’ with a Department Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the determination and must suspend International Trade Administration Republic of Turkey: Petitions for the Imposition of liquidation of entries pending a Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,’’ dated [A–122–863, A–484–803, A–533–881, A–570– January 17, 2018 (the Petitions). ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 077, A–580–897, A–489–833] 2 See Volume I of the Petitions, at 2. February 9, 2018, judgment in 3 See Memorandum for The Record from Maquilacero, sustaining Commerce’s Large Diameter Welded Pipe From Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for decision in the Final Remand Results Canada, Greece, India, the People’s Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- that the 46 products included in Republic of China, the Republic of exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Maquilacero’s scope ruling request are Korea, and the Republic of Turkey: ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the excluded from the Order constitutes a Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), final decision of the court that is not in Investigations dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this harmony with the Maquilacero Scope segment of the proceeding have been extended by Ruling. This notice is published in AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 3 days. fulfillment of the publication International Trade Administration, 4 See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petitions for the Department of Commerce. Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of requirements of Timken. Accordingly, Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada, Greece, Commerce will continue the suspension DATES: Applicable February 9, 2018. India, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of liquidation of the 46 products at issue of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Countervailing Duties on Imports from India, the pending expiration of the period to Susan Pulongbarit at (202) 482–4031 Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the appeal or, if appealed, pending a final (Canada); Brittany Bauer at (202) 482– Republic of Turkey: Supplemental Questions,’’ and conclusive court decision. 3860 (Greece); Jaron Moore at (202) 482– (General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire); ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties Amended Final Scope Ruling 3640 (India); Kabir Archuletta at (202) on Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from 482–8024 (the People’s Republic of {Canada}{sic}: Supplemental Questions;’’ ‘‘Petition Because there is now a final court China (China)); Jesus Saenz at (202) for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on decision with respect to the 482–8184 (the Republic of Korea Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Maquilacero Scope Ruling, Commerce is (Korea)); and Rebecca Janz at (202) 482– People’s Republic of China: Supplemental amending its final scope ruling. Questions;’’ ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of 2972 (the Republic of Turkey (Turkey)); Antidumping Duties on Imports of Large Diameter Commerce finds that the scope of the AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Welded Pipe from Greece: Supplemental Order does not cover the products Compliance, International Trade Questions;’’ and ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of addressed in the Maquilacero Scope Administration, U.S. Department of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Large Diameter Ruling. Commerce will instruct U.S. Welded Pipe from Turkey: Supplemental Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Questions.’’ All of these documents are dated Customs and Border Protection (CBP) NW, Washington, DC 20230. January 23, 2018. See also Commerce’s Letters, that the cash deposit rate will be zero ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: percent for the 46 products subject to on Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Maquilacero’s scope ruling request. In The Petitions India: Supplemental Questions;’’ and ‘‘Petition for the event that the CIT’s ruling is not the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports On January 17, 2018, the U.S. of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic appealed, or if appealed, upheld by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) of Korea: Supplemental Questions,’’ both dated CAFC, Commerce will instruct CBP to received antidumping duty (AD) January 24, 2018. See also Commerce’s Letter, liquidate entries of the 46 products at Petitions concerning imports of large ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties issue without regard to antidumping on Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the diameter welded pipe (welded pipe) People’s Republic of China: Supplemental 11 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant from Canada, China, Greece, India, Questions,’’ dated January 29, 2018. See also Korea, and Turkey, filed in proper form ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties to Remand in Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United on Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES States, Ct. No. 15–00287, November 27, 2017 (Final on behalf of American Cast Iron Pipe Greece: Additional Questions;’’ ‘‘Petition for the Remand Results). Company, Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Dura- Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of 12 See Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, Bond Industries, Skyline Steel, and Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Additional Slip Op. 18–8, Court No. 15–00287 (CIT 2018). Questions;’’ ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of 13 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 Stupp Corporation (collectively, the Antidumping Duties on Imports of Large Diameter (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), at 341. petitioners).1 The AD Petitions were Welded Pipe from Korea: Additional Questions;’’ 14 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. and ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 20 10) 1 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Large Diameter Welded Duties on Imports of Large Diameter Welded Pipe (Diamond Sawblades). Pipe from Canada, Greece, India, the People’s from Turkey: Additional Questions.’’ These VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1


Document Created: 2018-02-17 02:29:26
Document Modified: 2018-02-17 02:29:26
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable Date: February 19, 2018.
ContactMark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312.
FR Citation83 FR 7153 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR