83 FR 7186 - Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 34 (February 20, 2018)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 34 (February 20, 2018)
| Page Range | 7186-7188 | |
| FR Document | 2018-03386 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 7186-7188] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-03386] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day-18-1048] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the information collection request titled ``Assessing Education Agency Staff Perceptions of School Climate and Youth Access to Services.'' This study provides in-depth assessment of HIV and STD prevention efforts in three local education agencies funded by CDC's Division of Adolescent and School Health to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. CDC previously published a ``Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations'' notice on August 17, 2017, to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. CDC received four comments related to the previous notice. This notice serves to [[Page 7187]] allow an additional 30 days for public and affected agency comments. CDC will accept all comments for this proposed information collection project. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in comments that: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including, through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and (e) Assess information collection costs. To request additional information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call (404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Provide written comments within 30 days of notice publication. Proposed Project Assessing Education Agency Staff Perceptions of School Climate and Youth Access to Services (OMB #0920-1048, Expiration Date 02/28/2018)-- Revision--Division of Adolescent and School Health (DASH), National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requests a one-year OMB approval for the revision of the information collection with OMB control number 0920-1048. The information collection uses two separate, but complementary, information collections to conduct assessment of prevention efforts that are taking place in three local education agencies (LEA) funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under PS13-1308: Promoting Adolescent Health through School-Based HIV/STD Prevention and School-Based Surveillance. This data collection will provide data and reports for the funded LEAs, and will allow the LEAs to identify areas of the program that are working well and other areas that will need additional improvement. In addition, the findings will allow CDC to determine the potential impact of currently recommended strategies and make changes to those recommendations if necessary. This revision request involves no changes to instruments, protocols, or burden estimates per respondent or per data collection cycle; however, annualized burden estimates have technical changes due to changes in the number of data collections planned and the length of clearance requested. The first information collection will involve collecting information from a total of up to 735 LEA employees in 3 LEAs through a Web-based instrument tailored to each LEA. The instrument will include items that ask education agency staff about professional development, referral practices, community linkages/partners, school climate, school policies and practices, and staff comfort levels in helping address the health needs of youth. The second information collection will be conducted in only one LEA (Broward County Public Schools) and is designed to provide an in-depth assessment of one LEA as a way to supplement the Web-based data collection with more detailed information. This information collection will involve in-person interviews with up to 44 LEA employees (2 district level employees, and up to 6 school level employees in each of 7 schools) to learn about six domains that can impact school climate: Policy, practice, programs, professional development, place, and pedagogy. CDC will administer both the Web-based instrument and in-person interviews in the 2017-2018 school year as the final data collection in a series of data collections for the five-year PS13-1308 cooperative agreement. Although some staff may have participated in previous years' data collections, this is not a longitudinal design and individual staff member responses will not be tracked across the years. CDC will not collect personally identifiable information. All school staff members will receive informed consent forms prior to participation in the information collection. The consent form explains the study and also explains participants may choose not to complete the Web-based instrument or participate in the interviews with no penalty and no impact on their job or relationship with the LEA. Participation is completely voluntary. For the Web-based instrument, the estimated burden per response ranges from 20-25 minutes, and burden estimates presented here are based on the assumption of a 25-minute response time per response. The estimated annualized burden of this data collection is 306 hours for respondents. For the interviews, the estimated burden per response ranges from 60-90 minutes, depending on whether the respondent is a district-level administrator, a school-level administrator, or another school staff member. The burden estimates presented here are based on the assumption of a one-hour response time per district-level and school-level administrator response and a 1.5-hour response time per school staff member response. The estimated annualized burden of this data collection is 58 hours for respondents. The two information collections combine for a total estimated annualized burden of 364 hours for respondents. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. Table A.12-1--Estimated Annualize Burden to Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Average Number of Number of burden per Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in respondent hrs.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- School staff....................... Web-based instrument for 245 1 25/60 Broward County Public Schools. School staff....................... Web-based instrument for 245 1 25/60 Los Angeles Unified School District. [[Page 7188]] School staff....................... Web-based instrument for 245 1 25/60 San Francisco Unified School District. District-level Administrators...... School Climate Index 2 1 1 Interview Guide for District-level Administrators. School-level Administrators........ School Climate Index 14 1 1 Interview Guide for School- level Administrators. School Staff....................... School Climate Index 28 1 1.5 Interview Guide for School Staff. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2018-03386 Filed 2-16-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
![7186 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and Act to the Departments of Labor, Health information that may not be otherwise
clarity of the information to be and Human Services, Energy and available.
collected; and Justice. The Department of Health and NIOSH uses the data collected in this
4. Minimize the burden of the Human Services (DHHS) was delegated process to complete an individual dose
collection of information on those who the responsibility of establishing reconstruction that accounts, as fully as
are to respond, including through the methods for estimating radiation doses possible, for the radiation dose incurred
use of appropriate automated, received by eligible claimants with by the employee in the line of duty for
electronic, mechanical, or other cancer applying for compensation. DOE nuclear weapons production
technological collection techniques or NIOSH is applying the following programs. After dose reconstruction,
other forms of information technology, methods to estimate the radiation doses NIOSH also performs a brief, voluntary
e.g., permitting electronic submissions of individuals applying for final interview with the claimant to
of responses. compensation. explain the results and to allow the
5. Assess information collection costs. In performance of its dose claimant to confirm or question the
reconstruction responsibilities, under records NIOSH has compiled. This will
Proposed Project the Act, NIOSH is providing voluntary also be the final opportunity for the
EEOICPA Dose Reconstruction interview opportunities to claimants (or claimant to supplement the dose
Interviews and Forms, OMB No. 0920– their survivors) individually and reconstruction record.
0530, expires 04/30/2018—Extension— providing them with the opportunity to
National Institute for Occupational assist NIOSH in documenting the work At the conclusion of the dose
Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for history of the employee by reconstruction process, the claimant
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), characterizing the actual work tasks submits a form to confirm that the
Department of Health and Human performed. In addition, NIOSH and the claimant has no further information to
Services (DHHS). claimant may identify incidents that provide to NIOSH about the claim at
may have resulted in undocumented this time. The form notifies the claimant
Background and Brief Description radiation exposures, characterizing that signing the form allows NIOSH to
On October 30, 2000, the Energy radiological protection and monitoring forward a dose reconstruction report to
Employees Occupational Illness practices, and identify co-workers and DOL and to the claimant, and closes the
Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 other witnesses as may be necessary to record on data used for the dose
U.S.C. 7384–7385) was enacted. This confirm undocumented information. In reconstruction. Signing this form does
Act established a federal compensation this process, NIOSH uses a computer not indicate that the claimant agrees
program for employees of the assisted telephone interview (CATI) with the outcome of the dose
Department of Energy (DOE) and certain system, which allows interviews to be reconstruction. The dose reconstruction
of its contractors, subcontractors and conducted more efficiently and quickly results will be supplied to the claimant
vendors, who have suffered cancers and as opposed to a paper-based interview and to the DOL, the agency that will
other designated illnesses as a result of instrument. Both interviews are utilize them as one part of its
exposures sustained in the production voluntary and failure to participate in determination of whether the claimant
and testing of nuclear weapons. either or both interviews will not have is eligible for compensation under the
Executive Order 13179, issued on a negative effect on the claim, although Act.
December 7, 2000, delegated authorities voluntary participation may assist the There is no cost to respondents other
assigned to ‘‘the President’’ under the claimant by adding important than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Average
Number of Total
Number of burden per
Type of respondent Form name responses per burden
respondents response
respondent (in hours)
(in hours)
Claimant ............................................ Initial Interview ................................. 3,600 1 1 3,600
Claimant ............................................ Conclusion form OCAS–1 ................ 3,600 1 5/60 300
Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ 3,900
Leroy A. Richardson, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND School Climate and Youth Access to
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, HUMAN SERVICES Services.’’ This study provides in-depth
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the assessment of HIV and STD prevention
Associate Director for Science, Office of the Centers for Disease Control and efforts in three local education agencies
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded by CDC’s Division of Adolescent
Prevention. and School Health to the Office of
[30Day–18–1048]
[FR Doc. 2018–03387 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am] Management and Budget (OMB) for
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork review and approval. CDC previously
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Reduction Act Review published a ‘‘Proposed Data Collection
In accordance with the Paperwork Submitted for Public Comment and
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for Recommendations’’ notice on August
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 17, 2017, to obtain comments from the
has submitted the information public and affected agencies. CDC
collection request titled ‘‘Assessing received four comments related to the
Education Agency Staff Perceptions of previous notice. This notice serves to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7220/page/1.svg)
![7188 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices
TABLE A.12–1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZE BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS—Continued
Average
Number of
Number of burden per
Type of respondents Form name responses per
respondents response
respondent (in hrs.)
School staff ............................. Web-based instrument for San Francisco Unified School 245 1 25/60
District.
District-level Administrators .... School Climate Index Interview Guide for District-level Ad- 2 1 1
ministrators.
School-level Administrators .... School Climate Index Interview Guide for School-level Ad- 14 1 1
ministrators.
School Staff ............................ School Climate Index Interview Guide for School Staff ......... 28 1 1.5
Leroy A. Richardson, (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and removal workers, fabric mill workers,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, clarity of the information to be and fire fighters.
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the collected; Regulations of the Environmental
Associate Director for Science, Office of the (d) Minimize the burden of the Protection Agency (EPA) and the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
collection of information on those who
Prevention.
are to respond, including, through the also require the use of NIOSH-approved
[FR Doc. 2018–03386 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
use of appropriate automated, respirators. These regulations also
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P establish methods for respirator
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or manufacturers to submit respirators for
other forms of information technology, testing under the regulation and have
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
e.g., permitting electronic submission of them certified as NIOSH-approved if
HUMAN SERVICES
responses; and they meet the criteria given in the above
Centers for Disease Control and (e) Assess information collection regulation. This data collection was
Prevention costs. formerly named Respiratory Protective
To request additional information on Devices 30 CFR part 11, but in 1995, the
[30Day–18–0109] the proposed project or to obtain a copy respirator standard was moved to 42
of the information collection plan and CFR part 84.
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork In accordance with 42 CFR part 84,
Reduction Act Review instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct NIOSH performs the following
In accordance with the Paperwork written comments and/or suggestions activities: (1) Issues certificates of
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for regarding the items contained in this approval for respirators which have met
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notice to the Attention: CDC Desk specified construction, performance,
has submitted the information Officer, Office of Management and and protection requirements; (2)
collection request titled Respiratory Budget, 725 17th Street NW, establishes procedures and
Protective Devices—42 CFR part 84— Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) requirements to be met in filing
Regulation to the Office of Management 395–5806. Provide written comments applications for approval; (3) specifies
and Budget (OMB) for review and within 30 days of notice publication. minimum requirements and methods to
approval. CDC previously published a be employed by NIOSH and by
Proposed Project applicants in conducting inspections,
‘‘Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and Respiratory Protective Devices—42 examinations, and tests to determine
Recommendations’’ notice on October CFR part 84—Regulation (OMB Control effectiveness of respirators; (4)
20, 2017 to obtain comments from the Number 0920–0109, expiration establishes a schedule of fees to be
public and affected agencies. CDC did November 30, 2017)—Reinstatement charged to applicants for testing and
not receive comments related to the with Change—National Institute for certification, and (5) establishes
previous notice. This notice serves to Occupational Safety and Health, Centers approval labeling requirements. To
allow an additional 30 days for public for Disease Control and Prevention establish the scope and intent of
and affected agency comments. (CDC). request, NIOSH collects information
CDC will accept all comments for this from those who request services under
Background and Brief Description 42 CFR part 84.
proposed information collection project.
The Office of Management and Budget The regulatory authority for the Information collected from requests
is particularly interested in comments National Institute for Occupational for respirator approval functions
that: Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification includes contact information and
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed program for respiratory protective information about factors likely to affect
collection of information is necessary devices is found in the Mine Safety and respirator performance and use. Such
for the proper performance of the Health Amendments Act of 1977 (30 information includes, but is not
functions of the agency, including U.S.C. 577a, 651 et seq., and 657(g)) and necessarily limited to, respirator design,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
whether the information will have the Occupational Safety and Health Act manufacturing methods and materials,
practical utility; of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 3, 5, 7, 811, 842(h), quality assurance plans and procedures,
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the 844). These regulations have, as their and user instruction and draft labels, as
agencies estimate of the burden of the basis, the performance tests and criteria specified in the regulation.
proposed collection of information, for approval of respirators used by The main instrument for data
including the validity of the millions of American construction collection for respirator approval
methodology and assumptions used; workers, miners, painters, asbestos functions is the Standard Application
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Feb 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_7220/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-17 02:29:26
Document Modified: 2018-02-17 02:29:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 7186 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR