83_FR_7460 83 FR 7425 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

83 FR 7425 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 35 (February 21, 2018)

Page Range7425-7428
FR Document2018-03433

We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, -500 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracking in certain flanges, and the adjacent web, of the wing outboard flap track at certain positions. This proposed AD would require an inspection to determine the part number of the wing outboard flap track assembly; repetitive inspections of each affected wing outboard flap track for discrepancies, and applicable on-condition actions; and repetitive overhaul of each wing outboard flap track. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7425-7428]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0112; Product Identifier 2017-NM-161-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all 
The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, -500 series 
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracking in 
certain flanges, and the adjacent web, of the wing outboard flap track 
at certain positions. This proposed AD would require an inspection to 
determine the part number of the wing outboard flap track assembly; 
repetitive inspections of each affected wing outboard flap track for 
discrepancies, and applicable on-condition actions; and repetitive 
overhaul of each wing outboard flap track. We are proposing this AD to 
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information 
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It 
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0112.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0112; or in person at the Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains 
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other 
information. The street address for the Docket Operations (phone: 800-
647-5527) is listed above. Comments will be

[[Page 7426]]

available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount 
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5313; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0112; 
Product Identifier 2017-NM-161-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. 
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, 
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all 
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because 
of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating that during the tear down of a 
Model 737-300 airplane, cracking was found in the inboard lower flange 
and adjacent web near the forward attachment of the outboard flap track 
at position 8. The cracked flap track had accumulated 1,579 flight 
cycles since it was installed on the airplane after the most recent 
overhaul, and approximately 20,000 flight cycles since new. The 
metallurgical evaluation of the cracked flap track found that stress 
corrosion cracking originated from a fastener hole in the flap track 
web with missing cadmium plating. There was not sufficient evidence to 
conclude that the missing cadmium plating was the cause or the result 
of the cracking. Boeing has since received one more report of cracking 
in the outboard lower flange and the adjacent web of the outboard flap 
track at position 8 on a different Model 737-300 airplane. The crack 
was also found near the forward attachment, but did not originate from 
a fastener hole. The cracked flap track had accumulated 1,175 flight 
cycles since it was installed on the airplane. Boeing determined that 
the existing inspection programs are not sufficient to find such cracks 
before failure of a flap track could occur.
    Cracking in the area between the forward and rear spar attachments 
of the wing outboard flap tracks may lead to the inability of a 
principal structural element to sustain required flight load, such 
cracking could result in loss of the outboard trailing edge flap and 
consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.

Related Rulemaking

    AD 2013-09-02, Amendment 39-17443 (78 FR 27010, May 9, 2013) (``AD 
2013-09-02''), requires operators to use Boeing Service Bulletin (SB) 
737-57A1271, Revision 3, dated February 13, 2012 (``SB 737-57A1271 
R3''), to accomplish the inspections required by paragraph (p) of that 
AD. Boeing SB 737-57A1271 was issued to address more than 30 reports of 
stress corrosion cracks in the wing outboard flap tracks at positions 2 
and 7, and provides instructions to do detailed and non-destructive 
test (NDT) inspections of the flap track flanges and webs, and detailed 
and NDT inspections of the flap track at the rear spar attachment. 
Boeing SB 737-57A1271 also gives instructions to repair, overhaul, and 
replace the wing outboard flap tracks at positions 2 and 7. Boeing SB 
737-57A1271 does not include NDT inspections of the flap track flanges 
at the attachment of the flap transmission and the hinge support 
assembly, or NDT inspections of the flap track webs forward of the rear 
spar attachment nor repair, overhaul, and replacement of the wing 
outboard flap tracks at positions 1 and 8. As discussed above, Boeing 
reported information that indicates additional areas of stress 
corrosion cracks in other positions of the wing outboard flap tracks 
and the adjacent web of the outboard flap tracks. Therefore, the 
existing requirements of AD 2013-09-02 do not fully address the unsafe 
condition.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, 
dated September 25, 2017. The service information describes procedures 
for repetitive inspections, repair, repetitive overhaul, and 
replacement of the wing outboard flap tracks, and applicable on-
condition actions. This service information is reasonably available 
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal 
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant 
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is 
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require new NDT inspections of the flap 
track flanges and webs forward of the rear spar attachment, in areas 
not previously inspected using SB 737-57A1271 R3 (or previous 
revisions), to the existing requirements in AD 2013-09-02. The new and 
existing requirements would also apply to the wing outboard flap tracks 
at positions 1 and 8. Accomplishment of the inspections, repair, 
overhaul, and replacement of the wing outboard flap tracks specified in 
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 
2017, would replace the instruction in SB 737-57A1271 R3 (or previous 
revisions), and terminates the requirements of AD 2013-09-02.
    This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions 
identified in the Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, 
dated September 25, 2017, described previously, except for any 
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this 
proposed AD.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this 
service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and 
locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0112.

Explanation of Requirements Bulletin

    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the 
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee 
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a process for 
annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for 
compliance'' (RC) with an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC concept 
into Boeing service bulletins.
    In an effort to further improve the quality of ADs and AD-related 
Boeing service information, a joint process improvement initiative was 
worked between the FAA and Boeing. The initiative resulted in the 
development of a new process in which the service information more 
clearly identifies the actions needed to address the unsafe condition 
in the ``Accomplishment Instructions.'' The new process results in a 
Boeing Requirements Bulletin, which contains only the actions needed to 
address the unsafe condition (i.e., only the RC actions).

[[Page 7427]]

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 160 airplanes of U.S. 
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed 
AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost          Parts cost     Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection (positions 1 and 8;   78 work-hours x $85 per              $0  $6,630 per          $1,060,800 per
 Group 2 and Group 3,             hour = $6,630 per                        inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
 configuration 1).                inspection cycle.
Inspection (positions 1 and 8;   89 work-hours x $85 per               0  $7,565 per          $1,210,400 per
 Group 3, configuration 2).       hour = $7,565 per                        inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
Inspection (positions 2 and 7;   83 work-hours x $85 per               0  $7,055 per          $1,128,800 per
 Group 2 and Group 3,             hour = $7,055 per                        inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
 configuration 1).                inspection cycle.
Inspection (positions 2 and 7;   86 work-hours x $85 per               0  $7,310 per          $1,169,600 per
 Group 3, configuration 2).       hour = $7,310 per                        inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
cost estimates for the actions for Group 1 airplanes or the on-
condition actions specified in this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated 
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as 
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, 
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and 
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the 
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable 
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight 
Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2018-0112; Product Identifier 
2017-NM-161-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 9, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects AD 2013-09-02, Amendment 39-17443 (78 FR 27010, 
May 9, 2013) (``AD 2013-09-02'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, -500 series airplanes, certificated in any 
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking in certain flanges, 
and the adjacent web, of the wing outboard flap track at certain 
positions. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of 
the rear spar attachment, and cracking of the wing outboard flap 
tracks. Cracking in the area between the forward and rear spar 
attachments of the wing outboard flap tracks could lead to the 
inability of a principal structural element to sustain required 
flight load, and result in loss of the outboard trailing edge flap 
and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes

    For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Boeing Alert Requirements 
Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017: Within 120 days 
after the effective date of this AD, do actions to correct the 
unsafe condition using a method approved in accordance with the 
procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(h) Required Actions

    For airplanes not specified in paragraph (g) of this AD: Except 
as required by paragraph (i) of this AD, at the applicable times 
specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Alert 
Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017, do 
all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements

[[Page 7428]]

Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017.

    Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: Guidance for accomplishing 
the actions required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-57A1338, dated September 25, 2017, which is referred to 
in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated 
September 25, 2017.

(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements of 
this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, 
dated September 25, 2017, uses the phrase ``the original issue date 
of Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB,'' this AD requires using 
``the effective date of this AD.''

(j) Terminating Action for Requirements of AD 2013-09-02

    Accomplishment of the requirements specified in paragraph (h) of 
this AD terminates all of the requirements specified in AD 2013-09-
02.

(k) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on 
any airplane, a wing outboard flap track having a part number listed 
in paragraph 1.B. of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 
RB, dated September 25, 2017, unless the inspections and corrective 
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Requirements Bulletin 737-57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017, are 
accomplished prior to the part's installation on the airplane.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority 
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures 
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards 
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to 
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD. Information 
may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the 
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be 
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration 
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the 
approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Payman Soltani, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5313; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services 
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service 
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th 
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this 
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 12, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-03433 Filed 2-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P



                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                            7425

                                                 distribution of power and                               (e) Required Actions                                  –200C, –300, –400, –500 series
                                                 responsibilities among the various                         Within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS) and          airplanes. This proposed AD was
                                                 levels of government.                                   thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150 hours       prompted by reports of cracking in
                                                   For the reasons discussed, I certify                  TIS, clean and inspect the TGB fitting for a          certain flanges, and the adjacent web, of
                                                 this proposed regulation:                               crack in the areas depicted in Figure 1 of            the wing outboard flap track at certain
                                                   1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                  Leonardo Helicopters Bollettino Tecnico No.           positions. This proposed AD would
                                                 action’’ under Executive Order 12866;                   189–114, dated September 6, 2016. If there is         require an inspection to determine the
                                                   2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the            a crack, replace the TGB fitting before further
                                                                                                         flight.
                                                                                                                                                               part number of the wing outboard flap
                                                 DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures                                                                        track assembly; repetitive inspections of
                                                 (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);                       (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance                 each affected wing outboard flap track
                                                   3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in             (AMOCs)                                               for discrepancies, and applicable on-
                                                 Alaska to the extent that it justifies                     (1) The Manager, Safety Management                 condition actions; and repetitive
                                                 making a regulatory distinction; and                    Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,            overhaul of each wing outboard flap
                                                   4. Will not have a significant                        may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your              track. We are proposing this AD to
                                                 economic impact, positive or negative,                  proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation             address the unsafe condition on these
                                                 on a substantial number of small entities               Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section,
                                                                                                         Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
                                                                                                                                                               products.
                                                 under the criteria of the Regulatory
                                                 Flexibility Act.                                        Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;                 DATES:  We must receive comments on
                                                                                                         telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9-ASW-                this proposed AD by April 9, 2018.
                                                   We prepared an economic evaluation
                                                                                                         FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
                                                 of the estimated costs to comply with                      (2) For operations conducted under a 14            ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
                                                 this proposed AD and placed it in the                   CFR part 119 operating certificate or under           using the procedures found in 14 CFR
                                                 AD docket.                                              14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that            11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
                                                                                                         you notify your principal inspector, or               methods:
                                                 List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
                                                                                                         lacking a principal inspector, the manager of            • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
                                                   Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation                the local flight standards district office or         http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
                                                 safety, Incorporation by reference,                     certificate holding district office before
                                                                                                         operating any aircraft complying with this
                                                                                                                                                               instructions for submitting comments.
                                                 Safety.
                                                                                                         AD through an AMOC.                                      • Fax: 202–493–2251.
                                                 The Proposed Amendment                                                                                           • Mail: U.S. Department of
                                                                                                         (g) Additional Information
                                                   Accordingly, under the authority                                                                            Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
                                                                                                            The subject of this AD is addressed in             30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
                                                 delegated to me by the Administrator,                   European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
                                                 the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part                                                                         W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
                                                                                                         No. 2016–0177, dated September 8, 2016.
                                                 39 as follows:                                                                                                Washington, DC 20590.
                                                                                                         You may view the EASA AD on the internet
                                                                                                         at http://www.regulations.gov by searching               • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
                                                 PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS                                   for and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2017–           address above between 9 a.m. and 5
                                                 DIRECTIVES                                              0619.                                                 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
                                                                                                                                                               Federal holidays.
                                                 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39                 (h) Subject
                                                                                                                                                                  For service information identified in
                                                 continues to read as follows:                             Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
                                                                                                                                                               this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
                                                                                                         Code: 6520, Tail Rotor Gearbox. Issued in
                                                     Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
                                                                                                         Fort Worth, Texas, on February 12, 2018.              Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
                                                                                                                                                               Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster
                                                 § 39.13   [Amended]                                     Scott A. Horn,                                        Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA
                                                 ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding                   Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,            90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717;
                                                 the following new airworthiness                         Compliance & Airworthiness Division,                  internet https://
                                                 directive (AD):                                         Aircraft Certification Service.                       www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
                                                 AgustaWestland S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA–                  [FR Doc. 2018–03494 Filed 2–20–18; 8:45 am]           this referenced service information at
                                                    2017–0619; Product Identifier 2016–SW–               BILLING CODE 4910–13–P                                the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
                                                    093–AD.                                                                                                    2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
                                                 (a) Applicability                                                                                             For information on the availability of
                                                                                                         DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                          this material at the FAA, call 206–231–
                                                   This AD applies to AgustaWestland S.p.A.
                                                 Model AW189 helicopters, certificated in any                                                                  3195. It is also available on the internet
                                                                                                         Federal Aviation Administration                       at http://www.regulations.gov by
                                                 category, with tail assembly part number
                                                 8G5350A00131 installed.                                                                                       searching for and locating Docket No.
                                                                                                         14 CFR Part 39                                        FAA–2018–0112.
                                                 (b) Unsafe Condition
                                                                                                         [Docket No. FAA–2018–0112; Product                    Examining the AD Docket
                                                   This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
                                                                                                         Identifier 2017–NM–161–AD]
                                                 crack on a tail gearbox fitting. This condition                                                                 You may examine the AD docket on
                                                 could reduce the tail assembly’s ability to             RIN 2120–AA64
                                                 sustain loads from the tail rotor gearbox
                                                                                                                                                               the internet at http://
                                                 (TGB) and the tail rotor and result in loss of                                                                www.regulations.gov by searching for
                                                                                                         Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
                                                 helicopter control.                                                                                           and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
                                                                                                         Company Airplanes
                                                                                                                                                               0112; or in person at the Docket
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 (c) Comments Due Date                                                                                         Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
                                                                                                         AGENCY: Federal Aviation
                                                    We must receive comments by April 23,                Administration (FAA), DOT.                            Monday through Friday, except Federal
                                                 2018.                                                                                                         holidays. The AD docket contains this
                                                                                                         ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
                                                 (d) Compliance                                          (NPRM).                                               NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any
                                                   You are responsible for performing each                                                                     comments received, and other
                                                 action required by this AD within the                   SUMMARY:  We propose to adopt a new                   information. The street address for the
                                                 specified compliance time unless it has                 airworthiness directive (AD) for all The              Docket Operations (phone: 800–647–
                                                 already been accomplished prior to that time.           Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200,                   5527) is listed above. Comments will be


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:45 Feb 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM   21FEP1


                                                 7426                Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules

                                                 available in the AD docket shortly after                  Cracking in the area between the                    and determined the unsafe condition
                                                 receipt.                                                forward and rear spar attachments of the              described previously is likely to exist or
                                                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        wing outboard flap tracks may lead to                 develop in other products of the same
                                                 Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer,                     the inability of a principal structural               type design.
                                                 Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles                      element to sustain required flight load,
                                                                                                         such cracking could result in loss of the             Proposed AD Requirements
                                                 ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
                                                 Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;                     outboard trailing edge flap and                          This proposed AD would require new
                                                 phone: 562–627–5313; fax: 562–627–                      consequent reduced controllability of
                                                                                                                                                               NDT inspections of the flap track
                                                 5210; email: payman.soltani@faa.gov.                    the airplane.
                                                                                                                                                               flanges and webs forward of the rear
                                                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              Related Rulemaking                                    spar attachment, in areas not previously
                                                                                                            AD 2013–09–02, Amendment 39–                       inspected using SB 737–57A1271 R3 (or
                                                 Comments Invited
                                                                                                         17443 (78 FR 27010, May 9, 2013) (‘‘AD                previous revisions), to the existing
                                                   We invite you to send any written                     2013–09–02’’), requires operators to use              requirements in AD 2013–09–02. The
                                                 relevant data, views, or arguments about                Boeing Service Bulletin (SB) 737–                     new and existing requirements would
                                                 this proposal. Send your comments to                    57A1271, Revision 3, dated February 13,               also apply to the wing outboard flap
                                                 an address listed under the ADDRESSES                   2012 (‘‘SB 737–57A1271 R3’’), to                      tracks at positions 1 and 8.
                                                 section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–                      accomplish the inspections required by                Accomplishment of the inspections,
                                                 2018–0112; Product Identifier 2017–                     paragraph (p) of that AD. Boeing SB                   repair, overhaul, and replacement of the
                                                 NM–161–AD’’ at the beginning of your                    737–57A1271 was issued to address                     wing outboard flap tracks specified in
                                                 comments. We specifically invite                        more than 30 reports of stress corrosion              Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
                                                 comments on the overall regulatory,                     cracks in the wing outboard flap tracks               737–57A1338 RB, dated September 25,
                                                 economic, environmental, and energy                     at positions 2 and 7, and provides                    2017, would replace the instruction in
                                                 aspects of this NPRM. We will consider                  instructions to do detailed and non-                  SB 737–57A1271 R3 (or previous
                                                 all comments received by the closing                    destructive test (NDT) inspections of the             revisions), and terminates the
                                                 date and may amend this NPRM                            flap track flanges and webs, and                      requirements of AD 2013–09–02.
                                                 because of those comments.                              detailed and NDT inspections of the flap
                                                    We will post all comments we                                                                                  This proposed AD would require
                                                                                                         track at the rear spar attachment. Boeing             accomplishment of the actions
                                                 receive, without change, to http://                     SB 737–57A1271 also gives instructions
                                                 www.regulations.gov, including any                                                                            identified in the Boeing Alert
                                                                                                         to repair, overhaul, and replace the wing             Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1338
                                                 personal information you provide. We                    outboard flap tracks at positions 2 and
                                                 will also post a report summarizing each                                                                      RB, dated September 25, 2017,
                                                                                                         7. Boeing SB 737–57A1271 does not                     described previously, except for any
                                                 substantive verbal contact we receive                   include NDT inspections of the flap
                                                 about this proposed AD.                                                                                       differences identified as exceptions in
                                                                                                         track flanges at the attachment of the                the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
                                                 Discussion                                              flap transmission and the hinge support
                                                                                                         assembly, or NDT inspections of the flap                 For information on the procedures
                                                    We have received a report indicating                 track webs forward of the rear spar                   and compliance times, see this service
                                                 that during the tear down of a Model                    attachment nor repair, overhaul, and                  information at http://
                                                 737–300 airplane, cracking was found in                 replacement of the wing outboard flap                 www.regulations.gov by searching for
                                                 the inboard lower flange and adjacent                   tracks at positions 1 and 8. As discussed             and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
                                                 web near the forward attachment of the                  above, Boeing reported information that               0112.
                                                 outboard flap track at position 8. The                  indicates additional areas of stress
                                                 cracked flap track had accumulated                                                                            Explanation of Requirements Bulletin
                                                                                                         corrosion cracks in other positions of
                                                 1,579 flight cycles since it was installed              the wing outboard flap tracks and the                   The FAA worked in conjunction with
                                                 on the airplane after the most recent                   adjacent web of the outboard flap tracks.             industry, under the Airworthiness
                                                 overhaul, and approximately 20,000                      Therefore, the existing requirements of               Directives Implementation Aviation
                                                 flight cycles since new. The                            AD 2013–09–02 do not fully address the                Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), to
                                                 metallurgical evaluation of the cracked                 unsafe condition.                                     enhance the AD system. One
                                                 flap track found that stress corrosion
                                                                                                         Related Service Information Under 1                   enhancement is a process for annotating
                                                 cracking originated from a fastener hole
                                                                                                         CFR Part 51                                           which steps in the service information
                                                 in the flap track web with missing
                                                                                                                                                               are ‘‘required for compliance’’ (RC) with
                                                 cadmium plating. There was not                             We reviewed Boeing Alert                           an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC
                                                 sufficient evidence to conclude that the                Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1338                     concept into Boeing service bulletins.
                                                 missing cadmium plating was the cause                   RB, dated September 25, 2017. The
                                                 or the result of the cracking. Boeing has               service information describes                           In an effort to further improve the
                                                 since received one more report of                       procedures for repetitive inspections,                quality of ADs and AD-related Boeing
                                                 cracking in the outboard lower flange                   repair, repetitive overhaul, and                      service information, a joint process
                                                 and the adjacent web of the outboard                    replacement of the wing outboard flap                 improvement initiative was worked
                                                 flap track at position 8 on a different                 tracks, and applicable on-condition                   between the FAA and Boeing. The
                                                 Model 737–300 airplane. The crack was                   actions. This service information is                  initiative resulted in the development of
                                                 also found near the forward attachment,                 reasonably available because the                      a new process in which the service
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 but did not originate from a fastener                   interested parties have access to it                  information more clearly identifies the
                                                 hole. The cracked flap track had                        through their normal course of business               actions needed to address the unsafe
                                                 accumulated 1,175 flight cycles since it                or by the means identified in the                     condition in the ‘‘Accomplishment
                                                 was installed on the airplane. Boeing                   ADDRESSES section.                                    Instructions.’’ The new process results
                                                 determined that the existing inspection                                                                       in a Boeing Requirements Bulletin,
                                                 programs are not sufficient to find such                FAA’s Determination                                   which contains only the actions needed
                                                 cracks before failure of a flap track                     We are proposing this AD because we                 to address the unsafe condition (i.e.,
                                                 could occur.                                            evaluated all the relevant information                only the RC actions).


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:45 Feb 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00016   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM   21FEP1


                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                                   7427

                                                 Costs of Compliance                                     estimate the following costs to comply
                                                    We estimate that this proposed AD                    with this proposed AD:
                                                 affects 160 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
                                                                                                       ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
                                                                                                                                                                            Cost per            Cost on U.S.
                                                                    Action                                         Labor cost                        Parts cost             product              operators

                                                 Inspection (positions 1 and 8; Group 2             78 work-hours × $85 per     hour = $6,630                     $0   $6,630 per inspec-   $1,060,800 per in-
                                                   and Group 3, configuration 1).                     per inspection cycle.                                              tion cycle.          spection cycle.
                                                 Inspection (positions 1 and 8; Group 3,            89 work-hours × $85 per     hour = $7,565                      0   $7,565 per inspec-   $1,210,400 per in-
                                                   configuration 2).                                  per inspection cycle.                                              tion cycle.          spection cycle.
                                                 Inspection (positions 2 and 7; Group 2             83 work-hours × $85 per     hour = $7,055                     0    $7,055 per inspec-   $1,128,800 per in-
                                                   and Group 3, configuration 1).                     per inspection cycle.                                              tion cycle.          spection cycle.
                                                 Inspection (positions 2 and 7; Group 3,            86 work-hours × $85 per     hour = $7,310                      0   $7,310 per inspec-   $1,169,600 per in-
                                                   configuration 2).                                  per inspection cycle.                                              tion cycle.          spection cycle.



                                                   We have received no definitive data                   the relationship between the national                    (b) Affected ADs
                                                 that would enable us to provide cost                    Government and the States, or on the                       This AD affects AD 2013–09–02,
                                                 estimates for the actions for Group 1                   distribution of power and                                Amendment 39–17443 (78 FR 27010, May 9,
                                                 airplanes or the on-condition actions                   responsibilities among the various                       2013) (‘‘AD 2013–09–02’’).
                                                 specified in this proposed AD.                          levels of government.                                    (c) Applicability
                                                 Authority for This Rulemaking                             For the reasons discussed above, I                        This AD applies to all The Boeing
                                                                                                         certify this proposed regulation:                        Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
                                                    Title 49 of the United States Code                     (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                  –300, –400, –500 series airplanes, certificated
                                                 specifies the FAA’s authority to issue                  action’’ under Executive Order 12866,                    in any category.
                                                 rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,                     (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under                (d) Subject
                                                 section 106, describes the authority of                 the DOT Regulatory Policies and
                                                 the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:                                                                               Air Transport Association (ATA) of
                                                                                                         Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,                    America Code 57, Wings.
                                                 Aviation Programs, describes in more                    1979),
                                                 detail the scope of the Agency’s                          (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation                (e) Unsafe Condition
                                                 authority.                                              in Alaska, and                                              This AD was prompted by reports of
                                                    We are issuing this rulemaking under                                                                          cracking in certain flanges, and the adjacent
                                                                                                           (4) Will not have a significant
                                                 the authority described in Subtitle VII,                                                                         web, of the wing outboard flap track at
                                                                                                         economic impact, positive or negative,                   certain positions. We are issuing this AD to
                                                 Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
                                                                                                         on a substantial number of small entities                detect and correct cracking of the rear spar
                                                 ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
                                                                                                         under the criteria of the Regulatory                     attachment, and cracking of the wing
                                                 section, Congress charges the FAA with
                                                                                                         Flexibility Act.                                         outboard flap tracks. Cracking in the area
                                                 promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
                                                                                                                                                                  between the forward and rear spar
                                                 air commerce by prescribing regulations                 List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39                       attachments of the wing outboard flap tracks
                                                 for practices, methods, and procedures                                                                           could lead to the inability of a principal
                                                                                                           Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
                                                 the Administrator finds necessary for                                                                            structural element to sustain required flight
                                                                                                         safety, Incorporation by reference,
                                                 safety in air commerce. This regulation                                                                          load, and result in loss of the outboard
                                                                                                         Safety.
                                                 is within the scope of that authority                                                                            trailing edge flap and consequent reduced
                                                 because it addresses an unsafe condition                The Proposed Amendment                                   controllability of the airplane.
                                                 that is likely to exist or develop on                                                                            (f) Compliance
                                                                                                           Accordingly, under the authority
                                                 products identified in this rulemaking
                                                                                                         delegated to me by the Administrator,                       Comply with this AD within the
                                                 action.                                                                                                          compliance times specified, unless already
                                                                                                         the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
                                                    This proposed AD is issued in                                                                                 done.
                                                                                                         39 as follows:
                                                 accordance with authority delegated by
                                                 the Executive Director, Aircraft                                                                                 (g) Required Actions for Group 1 Airplanes
                                                                                                         PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
                                                 Certification Service, as authorized by                                                                             For airplanes identified as Group 1 in
                                                                                                         DIRECTIVES
                                                 FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance                                                                                Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
                                                 with that order, issuance of ADs is                                                                              57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017:
                                                                                                         ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39                  Within 120 days after the effective date of
                                                 normally a function of the Compliance                   continues to read as follows:                            this AD, do actions to correct the unsafe
                                                 and Airworthiness Division, but during                                                                           condition using a method approved in
                                                                                                             Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
                                                 this transition period, the Executive                                                                            accordance with the procedures specified in
                                                 Director has delegated the authority to                 § 39.13   [Amended]                                      paragraph (l) of this AD.
                                                 issue ADs applicable to transport                       ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding                    (h) Required Actions
                                                 category airplanes to the Director of the               the following new airworthiness
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 System Oversight Division.                                                                                          For airplanes not specified in paragraph (g)
                                                                                                         directive (AD):                                          of this AD: Except as required by paragraph
                                                 Regulatory Findings                                     The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–                      (i) of this AD, at the applicable times
                                                                                                             2018–0112; Product Identifier 2017–                  specified in the ‘‘Compliance’’ paragraph of
                                                   We determined that this proposed AD                                                                            Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
                                                                                                             NM–161–AD.
                                                 would not have federalism implications                                                                           57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017, do
                                                 under Executive Order 13132. This                       (a) Comments Due Date                                    all applicable actions identified in, and in
                                                 proposed AD would not have a                              We must receive comments by April 9,                   accordance with, the Accomplishment
                                                 substantial direct effect on the States, on             2018.                                                    Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements



                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:45 Feb 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM     21FEP1


                                                 7428                Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules

                                                 Bulletin 737–57A1338 RB, dated September                Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO                You must identify FAA Docket No.
                                                 25, 2017.                                               Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,                     FAA–2017–1034; Airspace Docket No.
                                                   Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD:                   Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627–              17–ANM–23, at the beginning of your
                                                 Guidance for accomplishing the actions                  5313; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
                                                                                                         payman.soltani@faa.gov.
                                                                                                                                                               comments. You may also submit
                                                 required by this AD can be found in Boeing                                                                    comments through the internet at http://
                                                 Alert Service Bulletin 737–57A1338, dated                  (2) For service information identified in
                                                 September 25, 2017, which is referred to in             this AD, contact Boeing Commercial                    www.regulations.gov.
                                                 Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–                 Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data                 FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
                                                 57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017.                   Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,              Designations and Reporting Points, and
                                                                                                         MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;               subsequent amendments can be viewed
                                                 (i) Exceptions to Service Information                   telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://             online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
                                                 Specifications                                          www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this              publications/. For further information,
                                                    For purposes of determining compliance               referenced service information at the FAA,
                                                                                                                                                               you can contact the Airspace Policy
                                                 with the requirements of this AD: Where                 Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
                                                                                                         216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information            Group, Federal Aviation
                                                 Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
                                                 57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017, uses              on the availability of this material at the           Administration, 800 Independence
                                                 the phrase ‘‘the original issue date of                 FAA, call 206–231–3195.                               Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
                                                 Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1338 RB,’’                                                                       telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
                                                                                                           Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
                                                 this AD requires using ‘‘the effective date of          12, 2018.                                             also available for inspection at the
                                                 this AD.’’                                                                                                    National Archives and Records
                                                                                                         Michael Kaszycki,
                                                 (j) Terminating Action for Requirements of                                                                    Administration (NARA). For
                                                                                                         Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
                                                 AD 2013–09–02                                                                                                 information on the availability of FAA
                                                                                                         Aircraft Certification Service.
                                                    Accomplishment of the requirements
                                                                                                                                                               Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)
                                                                                                         [FR Doc. 2018–03433 Filed 2–20–18; 8:45 am]
                                                 specified in paragraph (h) of this AD                                                                         741–6030, or go to https://
                                                                                                         BILLING CODE 4910–13–P                                www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
                                                 terminates all of the requirements specified
                                                 in AD 2013–09–02.                                                                                             ibr-locations.html.
                                                 (k) Parts Installation Limitation
                                                                                                                                                                  FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
                                                                                                         DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
                                                                                                                                                               Designations and Reporting Points, is
                                                    As of the effective date of this AD, no                                                                    published yearly and effective on
                                                 person may install, on any airplane, a wing             Federal Aviation Administration
                                                 outboard flap track having a part number                                                                      September 15.
                                                 listed in paragraph 1.B. of Boeing Alert                14 CFR Part 71                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
                                                 Requirements Bulletin 737–57A1338 RB,                                                                         Clark, Federal Aviation Administration,
                                                 dated September 25, 2017, unless the                    [Docket No. FAA–2017–1034; Airspace
                                                                                                                                                               Operations Support Group, Western
                                                 inspections and corrective actions specified            Docket No. 17–ANM–23]
                                                                                                                                                               Service Center, 1601 Lind Avenue SW,
                                                 in the Accomplishment Instructions of
                                                                                                         Proposed Amendment of Class D and                     Renton, WA 98057; telephone (425)
                                                 Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737–
                                                 57A1338 RB, dated September 25, 2017, are               Class E Airspace; Aurora, OR                          203–4511.
                                                 accomplished prior to the part’s installation                                                                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                 on the airplane.                                        AGENCY: Federal Aviation
                                                                                                         Administration (FAA), DOT.                            Authority for This Rulemaking
                                                 (l) Alternative Methods of Compliance                   ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
                                                 (AMOCs)                                                                                                         The FAA’s authority to issue rules
                                                                                                         (NPRM).                                               regarding aviation safety is found in
                                                    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
                                                                                                                                                               Title 49 of the United States Code.
                                                 FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs                 SUMMARY:   This action proposes to
                                                 for this AD, if requested using the procedures                                                                Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
                                                                                                         amend Class D airspace, Class E surface
                                                 found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with                                                                     authority of the FAA Administrator.
                                                                                                         area airspace, and Class E airspace
                                                 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your                                                                       Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
                                                                                                         extending upward from 700 feet above
                                                 principal inspector or local Flight Standards                                                                 describes in more detail the scope of the
                                                 District Office, as appropriate. If sending             the surface, at Aurora State Airport,
                                                                                                                                                               agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
                                                 information directly to the manager of the              Aurora, OR. After a biennial review the
                                                                                                                                                               promulgated under the authority
                                                 certification office, send it to the attention of       FAA found modification necessary to
                                                                                                                                                               described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
                                                 the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of            accommodate airspace redesign for the
                                                                                                                                                               Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
                                                 this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-              safety and management of instrument
                                                 ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.                                                                              section, the FAA is charged with
                                                                                                         flight rules (IFR) operations at the
                                                    (2) Before using any approved AMOC,                                                                        prescribing regulations to assign the use
                                                                                                         airport. Additionally, an editorial
                                                 notify your appropriate principal inspector,                                                                  of airspace necessary to ensure the
                                                                                                         change would be made removing the
                                                 or lacking a principal inspector, the manager                                                                 safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
                                                 of the local flight standards district office/          city associated with the airport name in
                                                                                                                                                               airspace. This regulation is within the
                                                 certificate holding district office.                    the airspace designations. Also, this
                                                                                                                                                               scope of that authority as it would
                                                    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable              proposal would make an editorial
                                                                                                                                                               amend Class D and Class E airspace at
                                                 level of safety may be used for any repair,             change to the Class D airspace legal
                                                                                                                                                               Aurora State Airport, Aurora, OR to
                                                 modification, or alteration required by this            description replacing Airport/Facility
                                                 AD if it is approved by the Boeing                                                                            support IFR operations at the airport.
                                                                                                         Directory with the term Chart
                                                 Commercial Airplanes Organization                       Supplement.                                           Comments Invited
                                                 Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
                                                 been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles             DATES: Comments must be received on                     Interested parties are invited to
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                 ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be               or before April 9, 2018.                              participate in this proposed rulemaking
                                                 approved, the repair method, modification               ADDRESSES: Send comments on this                      by submitting such written data, views,
                                                 deviation, or alteration deviation must meet            proposal to the U.S. Department of                    or arguments, as they may desire.
                                                 the certification basis of the airplane, and the        Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200               Comments that provide the factual basis
                                                 approval must specifically refer to this AD.
                                                                                                         New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building                   supporting the views and suggestions
                                                 (m) Related Information                                 Ground Floor, Room W12–140,                           presented are particularly helpful in
                                                   (1) For more information about this AD,               Washington, DC 20590; telephone:                      developing reasoned regulatory
                                                 contact Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer,             1–800–647–5527, or (202) 366–9826.                    decisions on the proposal. Comments


                                            VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:45 Feb 20, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00018   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\21FEP1.SGM   21FEP1



Document Created: 2018-02-21 01:48:45
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 01:48:45
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
DatesWe must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 9, 2018.
ContactPayman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5313; fax: 562-627- 5210; email: [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 7425 
RIN Number2120-AA64
CFR AssociatedAir Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR