83 FR 8802 - Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Decreased Assessment Rate
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 41 (March 1, 2018)
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 41 (March 1, 2018)
| Page Range | 8802-8804 | |
| FR Document | 2018-04010 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 41 (Thursday, March 1, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 8802-8804] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-04010] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules [[Page 8802]] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 925 [Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0082; SC18-925-1 PR] Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Decreased Assessment Rate AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) to decrease the assessment rate established for the 2018 fiscal period and subsequent fiscal periods. This proposed rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart headings to bring the language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register requirements. DATES: Comments must be received by April 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under Marketing Agreement No. 925 and Order No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. Part 925 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of grapes operating within the area of production, and a member of the public. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017). This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, grape handlers in a designated area of southeastern California are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are derived from such assessments. Assessment fees charged to grape handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. It is intended that the assessment rate as proposed herein would be applicable to all assessable grapes beginning on January 1, 2018, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This proposed rule would decrease the assessment rate for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.030 to $0.020 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California, and a member of the public. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. For the 2016 and subsequent fiscal periods the Committee recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate [[Page 8803]] of $0.030 per 18-pound lug of grapes. That rate would continue in effect unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA. The Committee met on November 30, 2017 and unanimously recommended 2018 fiscal year expenditures of $119,000, with an estimated cash reserve of $115,000, and an assessment rate of $0.020 per 18-pound lug of grapes. In comparison, last fiscal year's budgeted expenditures were $108,500. The assessment rate of $.020 is $0.010 lower than the rate currently in effect. The 2017 crop, at the higher assessment rate currently in effect, provided more income than required to cover expenses, resulting in an estimated cash reserve of $140,000. The cash reserves are sufficient to supplement this fiscal year's revenues at an assessment rate of $0.020 per 18-pound lug of grapes to fully fund the recommended 2018 budgeted expenditures. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2018 fiscal year include $65,000 for management and compliance services, $25,500 in office expenditures, and $28,500 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items in fiscal year 2017 were $50,000 for management and compliance services, $28,330 in office expenditures, and $28,500 for research. The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by considering anticipated expenses, expected shipments of grapes in the production area, and the level of funds in the authorized reserve. Grape shipments for fiscal year 2018 are estimated at 4,700,000 18- pound lugs, which should provide $94,000 in assessment income. Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the Committee's authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve (currently $140,000) would be reduced by $25,000 and would be within the maximum permitted by the Order. Section 925.42(a)(2) authorizes the Committee to carry over excess funds into subsequent fiscal years provided that funds in the reserve not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. The Committee may utilize the reserve funds to defray expenses during any fiscal period. The Committee proposes to utilize approximately $25,000 of its carry-over reserve funds to fully fund the fiscal year 2018 proposed budget, while assessing the new fiscal year 2018 crop at the proposed lower rate; thereby maintaining the carry-over reserve fund within the authorized limit allowed by the Order. The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budget for fiscal year 2018 and those for subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 38 producers of grapes in the production area and approximately 14 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201). Eleven of the 14 handlers subject to the Order have annual grape sales of less than $7,500,000, according to USDA Market News Service and Committee data. In addition, information from the Committee and USDA's Market News indicates that at least ten of 38 producers have annual receipts of less than $750,000. Thus, it may be concluded that a majority of the grape handlers regulated under the Order and about ten of the producers could be classified as small entities under the SBA's definitions. This proposal would decrease the assessment rate collected from handlers for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.030 to $0.020 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The Committee unanimously recommended fiscal year 2018 expenditures of $119,000 and an assessment rate of $0.020 per 18-pound lug. The proposed assessment rate of $0.020 is $0.010 lower than the 2017 rate. The quantity of assessable commodity for the 2018 fiscal year is estimated at 4,700,000 18-pound lugs. Thus, the $0.020 rate should provide $94,000 in assessment income. That amount plus the use of reserve funds of $25,000 should be adequate to meet this 2018 fiscal year's expenses. Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the Committee's authorized reserve, would be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2018 fiscal year include $65,000 for management and compliance services, $25,500 in office expenditures, and $28,500 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items in 2017 were $50,000 for management and compliance services, $28,330 in office expenditures, and $28,500 for research. Funds in the reserve (currently $140,000) would be reduced by $25,000 to be within the maximum permitted by the Order. Section 925.42 provides the Committee authority to carry over excess funds into subsequent fiscal years provided that funds in the reserve do not exceed approximately one fiscal period's expenses. The Committee is authorized to utilize the excess funds to defray expenses during any fiscal period. The Committee proposes to utilize approximately $25,000 of its carry-over reserve funds to fully fund the 2018 proposed budget, while assessing the new 2018 crop at the proposed lower rate; thereby maintaining the carry-over reserve fund within the authorized limit stated in the Order, approximately one fiscal period's expenses. Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee considered various options, such as maintaining the current assessment rate and expenditure levels. Alternative expenditure levels were discussed by the Committee, based upon the relative value of various activities to the grape [[Page 8804]] industry. The Committee ultimately determined that 2018 expenditures of $119,000 were appropriate, and the recommended assessment rate and the use of $25,000 from the carry-over financial reserves would provide sufficient revenue to meet its expenses. A review of historical crop and price information, as well as preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period, indicates that the shipping point price for the 2017 season averaged about $21.62 per 18-pound lug of California desert grapes handled. If the 2018 price is similar to the 2017 price, estimated assessment revenue as a percentage of total estimated handler revenue would be 0.09 percent for the 2018 season ($0.020 divided by $21.62 per 18-pound lug). This action would decrease the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate would reduce the burden on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the production area. The grape industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the November 30, 2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and information collection impacts of this action on small businesses. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189. No changes in those requirements are necessary as a result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large southeastern California grape handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule. All written comments timely received will be considered before a final determination is made on this rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925 Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA 0 1. The authority citation for part 925 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. 0 2. Sections 925.1 through 925.69 are designated as subpart A under a heading to read as follows: Subpart A--Order Regulating Handling [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B and Amended] 0 3. Redesignate ``Subpart--Rules and Regulations'' as subpart B and revise the heading to read as follows: Subpart B--Administrative Requirements [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C] 0 4. Redesignate ``Subpart--Assessment Rates'' as ``Subpart C Assessment Rates''. 0 5. Section 925.215 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 925.215 Assessment rate. On and after January 1, 2018, an assessment rate of $0.020 per 18- pound lug is established for grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. Dated: February 22, 2018. Bruce Summers, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2018-04010 Filed 2-28-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
![8802
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 41
Thursday, March 1, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: area of southeastern California are
contains notices to the public of the proposed Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist or subject to assessments. Funds to
issuance of rules and regulations. The Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, administer the Order are derived from
purpose of these notices is to give interested California Marketing Field Office, such assessments. Assessment fees
persons an opportunity to participate in the Marketing Order and Agreement charged to grape handlers are used by
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Division, Specialty Crops Program, the Committee to fund reasonable and
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487– necessary expenses of the program. It is
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email: intended that the assessment rate as
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Maria.Stobbe@ams.usda.gov or proposed herein would be applicable to
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov. all assessable grapes beginning on
Agricultural Marketing Service Small businesses may request January 1, 2018, and continue until
information on complying with this amended, suspended, or terminated.
7 CFR Part 925 regulation by contacting Richard Lower, The Act provides that administrative
Marketing Order and Agreement proceedings must be exhausted before
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0082; SC18–925–1
PR] Division, Specialty Crops Program, parties may file suit in court. Under
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, handler subject to an order may file
Southeastern California; Decreased DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– with USDA a petition stating that the
Assessment Rate 2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: order, any provision of the order, or any
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. obligation imposed in connection with
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This the order is not in accordance with law
USDA. action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, and request a modification of the order
ACTION: Proposed rule. proposes an amendment to regulations or to be exempted therefrom. Such
issued to carry out a marketing order as handler is afforded the opportunity for
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would a hearing on the petition. After the
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
implement a recommendation from the hearing, USDA would rule on the
rule is issued under Marketing
California Desert Grape Administrative petition. The Act provides that the
Agreement No. 925 and Order No. 925,
Committee (Committee) to decrease the district court of the United States in any
as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating
assessment rate established for the 2018 district in which the handler is an
the handling of grapes grown in a
fiscal period and subsequent fiscal inhabitant, or has his or her principal
designated area of southeastern
periods. This proposed rule also makes place of business, has jurisdiction to
California. Part 925 (referred to as the
administrative revisions to the subpart review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
headings to bring the language into provided an action is filed not later than
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
conformance with the Office of Federal 20 days after the date of the entry of the
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
Register requirements. ruling.
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
DATES: Comments must be received by Committee locally administers the This proposed rule would decrease
April 2, 2018. Order and is comprised of producers the assessment rate for the 2018 and
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are and handlers of grapes operating within subsequent fiscal periods from $0.030 to
invited to submit written comments the area of production, and a member of $0.020 per 18-pound lug of grapes
concerning this proposed rule. the public. handled.
Comments must be sent to the Docket The Department of Agriculture The Order provides authority for the
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement (USDA) is issuing this rule in Committee, with the approval of USDA,
Division, Specialty Crops Program, conformance with Executive Orders to formulate an annual budget of
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence 13563 and 13175. This action falls expenses and collect assessments from
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, within a category of regulatory actions handlers to administer the program. The
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or that the Office of Management and members of the Committee are
internet: http://www.regulations.gov. Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive producers and handlers of grapes grown
Comments should reference the Order 12866 review. Additionally, in a designated area of southeastern
document number and the date and because this rule does not meet the California, and a member of the public.
page number of this issue of the Federal definition of a significant regulatory They are familiar with the Committee’s
Register and will be available for public action, it does not trigger the needs and with the costs for goods and
inspection in the Office of the Docket requirements contained in Executive services in their local area and are thus
Clerk during regular business hours, or Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum in a position to formulate an appropriate
can be viewed at: http:// titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing budget and assessment rate. The
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
www.regulations.gov. All comments Section 2 of the Executive Order of assessment rate is formulated and
submitted in response to this proposed January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
rule will be included in the record and Regulation and Controlling Regulatory directly affected persons have an
will be made available to the public. Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). opportunity to participate and provide
Please be advised that the identity of the This proposed rule has been reviewed input.
individuals or entities submitting the under Executive Order 12988, Civil For the 2016 and subsequent fiscal
comments will be made public on the Justice Reform. Under the Order now in periods the Committee recommended,
internet at the address provided above. effect, grape handlers in a designated and USDA approved, an assessment rate
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_8843/page/1.svg)
![8804 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 41 / Thursday, March 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
industry. The Committee ultimately information technologies to provide Dated: February 22, 2018.
determined that 2018 expenditures of increased opportunities for citizen Bruce Summers,
$119,000 were appropriate, and the access to Government information and Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
recommended assessment rate and the services, and for other purposes. Service.
use of $25,000 from the carry-over USDA has not identified any relevant [FR Doc. 2018–04010 Filed 2–28–18; 8:45 am]
financial reserves would provide Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
sufficient revenue to meet its expenses. conflict with this action.
A review of historical crop and price
A small business guide on complying
information, as well as preliminary DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
information pertaining to the upcoming with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
fiscal period, indicates that the shipping marketing agreements and orders may Agricultural Marketing Service
point price for the 2017 season averaged be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/
about $21.62 per 18-pound lug of rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. 7 CFR Part 959
California desert grapes handled. If the Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower [AMS–SC–17–0067; SC17–959–4]
2018 price is similar to the 2017 price,
estimated assessment revenue as a at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Onions Grown in South Texas;
percentage of total estimated handler Proposed Amendment to Marketing
revenue would be 0.09 percent for the section.
Order 959
2018 season ($0.020 divided by $21.62 A 30-day comment period is provided
per 18-pound lug). to allow interested persons to respond AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
This action would decrease the to this proposed rule. All written USDA.
assessment obligation imposed on comments timely received will be ACTION: Proposed rule.
handlers. Assessments are applied considered before a final determination
uniformly on all handlers, and some of is made on this rule. SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites
the costs may be passed on to comments on a proposed amendment to
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
producers. However, decreasing the Marketing Order No. 959, which
assessment rate would reduce the Grapes, Marketing agreements, regulates the handling of onions grown
burden on handlers, and may reduce the Reporting and recordkeeping in south Texas. The proposed
burden on producers. In addition, the requirements. amendment would reduce the size of
Committee’s meeting was widely the South Texas Onion Committee
For the reasons set forth in the
publicized throughout the production (Committee) and make conforming and
area. The grape industry and all preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is proposed to
clarifying amendments as needed. The
interested persons were invited to be amended as follows:
amendment would adjust the number of
attend the meeting and participate in PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A handlers and producers on the
Committee deliberations on all issues. DESIGNATED AREA OF Committee to reflect a decrease in the
Like all Committee meetings, the SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA number of onion producers and
November 30, 2017, meeting was a handlers in recent years.
public meeting and all entities, both ■ 1. The authority citation for part 925 DATES: Comments must be received by
large and small, were able to express continues to read as follows: April 30, 2018.
views on this issue. Finally, interested
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
persons are invited to submit comments
on this proposed rule, including the invited to submit written comments
■ 2. Sections 925.1 through 925.69 are concerning this proposed rule.
regulatory and information collection designated as subpart A under a heading
impacts of this action on small Comments must be sent to the Docket
to read as follows: Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement
businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Division, Specialty Crops Program,
Subpart A—Order Regulating Handling AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. [Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B
Chapter 35), the Order’s information Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
and Amended] DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and ■ 3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and internet: http://www.regulations.gov. All
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No Regulations’’ as subpart B and revise the comments should reference the
changes in those requirements are heading to read as follows: document number and the date and
necessary as a result of this action. page number of this issue of the Federal
Should any changes become necessary, Subpart B—Administrative Register and will be made available for
they would be submitted to OMB for Requirements [Subpart Redesignated public inspection in the Office of the
approval. as Subpart C] Docket Clerk during regular business
This proposed rule would impose no hours, or can be viewed at: http://
additional reporting or recordkeeping ■ 4. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Assessment www.regulations.gov. All comments
requirements on either small or large Rates’’ as ‘‘Subpart C Assessment submitted in response to this proposed
southeastern California grape handlers. Rates’’. rule will be included in the record and
As with all Federal marketing order ■ 5. Section 925.215 is revised to read will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
programs, reports and forms are as follows:
periodically reviewed to reduce individuals or entities submitting the
§ 925.215 Assessment rate. comments will be made public on the
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public On and after January 1, 2018, an internet at the address provided above.
sector agencies. assessment rate of $0.020 per 18-pound FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AMS is committed to complying with lug is established for grapes grown in a Geronimo Quinones, Marketing
the E-Government Act, to promote the designated area of southeastern Specialist, or Julie Santoboni,
use of the internet and other California. Rulemaking Branch Chief, Marketing
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Feb 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_8843/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-28 23:58:17
Document Modified: 2018-02-28 23:58:17
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by April 2, 2018. | |
| Contact | Maria Stobbe, Marketing Specialist or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 8802 | |
| CFR Associated | Grapes; Marketing Agreements and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR