83 FR 9215 - Approval of Section 112(l) Authority for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities; State of Vermont
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 43 (March 5, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 43 (March 5, 2018)
| Page Range | 9215-9219 | |
| FR Document | 2018-04277 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 9215-9219] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-04277] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0343; A-1-FRL-9972-97-Region 1] Approval of Section 112(l) Authority for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities; State of Vermont AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to grant the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (VT DEC) the authority to implement and enforce, with respect to area sources only, the Vermont Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule in place of the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (Dry Cleaning NESHAP). Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), the VT DEC submitted a request for approval to implement and enforce the Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule of the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations as a partial substitution for the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (Dry Cleaning NESHAP), as it applies to area sources. EPA has reviewed this request and has determined that the Vermont Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule satisfies the requirements necessary for partial rule substitution. Thus, EPA is hereby granting VT DEC's request. This action does not affect the authority of any party to implement and enforce the Dry Cleaning NESHAP with respect to major source dry cleaners. This approval makes the Vermont Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule federally enforceable in Vermont. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 4, 2018, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 4, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 4, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2017-0343 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lancey, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number 617-918-1656, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. General Information A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? B. Does this direct final rule apply to me? C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA? II. Background III. What requirements must a State rule meet to substitute for a Section 112 rule? IV. What if any material differences exist between the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule and the Dry Cleaning NESHAP and what is EPA's evaluation? A. What are the differences in applicability? B. How does the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule address the control requirements? C. How do the monitoring requirements differ? D. What are the differences in reporting and recordkeeping? E. Is the State's submittal separable? F. What is EPA's action regarding the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule? V. Final Action VI. Incorporation by Reference VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews VIII. Judicial Reviews I. General Information A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the state rule should adverse comments be filed. If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice withdrawing the direct final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties interested in commenting on the proposed rule [[Page 9216]] should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on June 4, 2018 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. B. Does this direct final rule apply to me? Categories and entities potentially regulated by this direct final rule include: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAICS \1\ Category code ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coin Operated Laundries and Dry Cleaners..................... 812310 Dry Cleaning and Laundry Services (except coin operated)..... 812320 Industrial Laundries......................................... 812332 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ North American Industry Classification System. This Table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this direct final rule. To determine whether your facility is affected you should examine the applicability criteria in the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning. If you have questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of this action to a particular entity, please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA? Do not submit information containing CBI to EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comments that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comments that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. Send or deliver information identified as CBI only to the following address: ``EPA-R01-OAR-2017- 0343'', Susan Lancey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square (mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912. II. Background Under CAA section 112(l), EPA may approve state or local rules or programs to be implemented and enforced in place of certain otherwise applicable Federal rules, emissions standards, or requirements. The Federal regulations governing EPA's approval of state and local rules or programs under section 112(l) are located at 40 CFR part 63, subpart E. See 58 FR 62262 (November 26, 1993), as amended by 65 FR 55810 (September 14, 2000). Under these regulations, a state air pollution control agency has the option to request EPA's approval to substitute a state rule for the applicable Federal rule (e.g., the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants). Upon approval by EPA, the state agency is authorized to implement and enforce its rule in place of the Federal rule, and the state rule becomes federally enforceable in that state. EPA originally promulgated the Dry Cleaning NESHAP on September 22, 1993. See 58 FR 49354. The Dry Cleaning NESHAP has been amended several times and is codified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart M, ``National Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities.'' On May 26, 2017, EPA received VT DEC's request to implement and enforce Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations (VT APCR) section 5-253.11 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning (Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule) in lieu of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP as applied to area sources. III. What requirements must a State rule meet to substitute for a Section 112 rule? A state must demonstrate that it has satisfied the general delegation/approval criteria contained in 40 CFR 63.91(d). The process of providing ``up-front approval'' assures that a state has met the delegation criteria in Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA as implemented by EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 63.91(d). These criteria require, among other things, that the state has demonstrated that its NESHAP program contains adequate authorities to assure compliance with each applicable Federal requirement, adequate resources for implementation, and an expeditious compliance schedule. Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3), interim or final Title V program approval under 40 CFR part 70 satisfies the criteria set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(d) for ``up-front approval.'' On November 29, 2001, EPA promulgated full approval of VT DEC's operating permits program with an effective date of November 30, 2001. See 66 FR 59535. Accordingly, VT DEC has satisfied the up-front approval criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). Additionally, the regulations governing approval of state requirements that substitute for a section 112 rule require EPA to evaluate the state's submittal to ensure that it meets the stringency and other requirements of 40 CFR 63.93. A rule will be approved if the state requirements contain or demonstrate: (1) Applicability criteria that are no less stringent than the corresponding Federal rule; (2) levels of control and compliance and enforcement measures that result in emission reductions from each affected source that are no less stringent than would result from the otherwise applicable Federal rule; (3) a compliance schedule that requires each affected source to be in compliance within a time frame consistent with the deadlines established in the otherwise applicable Federal rule; and (4) the additional compliance and enforcement measures as specified in 40 CFR 63.93(b)(4). See 40 CFR 63.93(b). A state may also seek, and EPA may approve, a partial delegation of the EPA's authorities. See CAA 112(l)(1). To obtain a partial rule substitution, the state's submittal must meet the otherwise applicable requirements in 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93, and be separable from the portions of the program that the state is not seeking rule substitution for. See 64 FR 1889. Before we can approve alternative requirements in place of a part 63 emissions standard, the state must submit to us detailed information that demonstrates how the alternative requirements compare with the otherwise applicable Federal standard. A detailed discussion of how EPA will determine equivalency for state alternative NESHAP requirements is provided in the preamble to EPA's proposed Subpart E amendments on January 12, 1999. See 64 FR 1908. After reviewing VT DEC's partial rule substitution request and equivalency demonstration for the Dry Cleaning NESHAP as it applies to area sources, EPA has determined this request meets all the requirements necessary for approval under CAA section 112(l) and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93. IV. What if any material differences exist between the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule and the Dry Cleaning NESHAP and what is EPA's evaluation? The following discussion explains the major differences between the area source requirements in the Vermont Dry [[Page 9217]] Cleaning Rule and the area source requirements in the Dry Cleaning NESHAP and how EPA evaluated the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule. A detailed side-by-side comparison of these requirements, as well as an equivalency narrative, are included in the public docket. A. What are the differences in applicability? The Dry Cleaning NESHAP applies to each dry cleaning facility that uses perchloroethylene (PCE), except for coin-operated dry cleaning machines. The Dry Cleaning NESHAP exempts existing dry cleaning machines from certain requirements if the total PCE consumption of the dry cleaning facility is less than 140 gallons per year. See 40 CFR 63.320(d). The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule applies to all dry cleaning facilities that use PCE at area sources of HAP. The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule has no exemption for coin-operated machines and no exemption based on PCE consumption. Under Vermont's rule, major sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) must continue to comply with the Federal Dry Cleaning NESHAP. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(a). Consequently, EPA finds that the applicability of the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule is no less stringent than that of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP. B. How does the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule address the control requirements? The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires the owner or operator of each dry cleaning system at area sources to equip each dry cleaning machine with a refrigerated condenser, except that certain existing dry cleaning systems installed between December 9, 1991, and September 22, 1993, may alternatively comply by routing the air-perchloroethylene gas-vapor stream of each dry cleaning machine through a carbon adsorber. See 40 CFR 63.322(a). The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires new area source dry cleaning systems installed after December 21, 2005, to equip each dry cleaning machine with a refrigerated condenser and a non-vented carbon adsorber and to desorb the carbon adsorber in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. See 40 CFR 63.322(o)(2). The Vermont Dry Cleaning rule requires all dry cleaning machines to be equipped with a refrigerated condenser without exception, and requires dry cleaning systems installed after December 21, 2005 to equip each dry cleaning machine with a refrigerated condenser and a non-vented carbon adsorber. The carbon adsorber must be desorbed in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction. The Vermont Dry Cleaning rule does not allow a primary carbon adsorber as a method of control. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(c)(2) and (4). Both the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule and the Dry Cleaning NESHAP effectively prohibit transfer machines, prohibit dry cleaning systems installed after December 21, 2005 in a building with a residence, and prohibit any dry cleaning system in a building with a residence after December 21, 2020. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(c)(3), (5)-(6) and 40 CFR 63.322(o)(3)-(5). The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule only allows equivalent control devices approved by the Vermont Air Pollution Control Officer and the EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 63.325. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(c)(2)(ii) and (3). Consequently, EPA finds that the Vermont Dry Cleaning control requirements are no less stringent than those of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP. C. How do the monitoring requirements differ? The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires dry cleaning systems at area sources to be inspected weekly for perceptible leaks and requires a monthly inspection using a halogenated hydrocarbon detector or PCE gas analyzer. See 40 CFR 63.322(k) and (o)(1)(i). Instead, the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule requires a weekly inspection for perceptible leaks and a weekly inspection using a halogenated hydrocarbon detector or PCE gas analyzer. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(e)(1). The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires weekly temperature monitoring to determine if the temperature is equal to or less than 45 degrees Fahrenheit, or alternatively monitoring of refrigeration system high pressure and low pressure during the drying phase. See 40 CFR 63.323(a)(1). The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule requires weekly temperature monitoring of the refrigerated condenser and requires the temperature to be maintained at less than or equal to 40 degrees Fahrenheit. The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule does not allow refrigeration system high and low pressure monitoring as an alternative to temperature monitoring of the refrigerated condenser. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(c)(2)(i)(B) and (e)(2). Therefore, EPA finds that the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule monitoring requirements are no less stringent than those of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP. D. What are the differences in reporting and recordkeeping? The Dry Cleaning NESHAP requires the owner or operator of any new dry cleaning facility to submit a notification of compliance status within 30 days after startup. See 40 CFR 63.324(b). The Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule also requires the owner or operator of any new dry cleaning facility to submit a notification of compliance status within 30 days of commencing operations. See VT APCR section 5-253.11(g)(2). Thus, the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule reporting requirements are no less stringent than those of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP. E. Is the State's submittal separable? A state may also seek, and EPA may approve, a partial delegation of the EPA's authorities. See CAA 112(l)(1). To obtain a partial rule substitution, the state's submittal must meet the otherwise applicable requirements in 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93, and be separable from the portions of the program that the state is not seeking rule substitution for. See 64 FR 1889. A separable portion of a state rule or program is a section(s) of a rule or a portion(s) of a program which can be acted upon independently without affecting the overall integrity of the rule or program as a whole. Here, the state's rule applies to area source dry cleaners, while the NESHAP continues to apply to major source dry cleaners. EPA finds that there exists a logical and compelling distinction between area and major dry cleaning sources. That is, the state rule may independently regulate area source dry cleaners separate from major source dry cleaners, without affecting the overall integrity of the rule or program as a whole. EPA further finds that granting partial delegation would not create an overly cumbersome or unworkable scheme. For these reasons, EPA concludes that the portion of the NESHAP delegated under this partial rule substitution is separable from the remainder of the NESHAP. Therefore, partial delegation is appropriate. F. What is EPA's action regarding the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule? After reviewing VT DEC's request for approval of the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule, EPA has determined that the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule meets all of the requirements necessary for partial rule substitution under section 112(l) of the CAA and 40 CFR 63.91 and 63.93. Therefore, EPA hereby approves VT DEC's request to implement and enforce VT APCR section 5-253.11 (as effective under state law on December 15, 2016), in place of the Dry Cleaning NESHAP for area sources in Vermont. As of the effective date of this action, the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule is enforceable by EPA and by citizens under the CAA. Although VT DEC has primary [[Page 9218]] responsibility to implement and enforce the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule, EPA retains the authority to enforce any requirement of the rule upon its approval under CAA 112. See CAA section 112(l)(7). V. Final Action EPA is approving the Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning (as effective under state law on December 15, 2016) as a partial rule substitution for the Dry Cleaning NESHAP for area sources in Vermont. The Federal Dry Cleaning NESHAP continues to apply to major source dry cleaners in Vermont. The applicability of the Federal NESHAP to major source dry cleaners is in no way affected by this action. This rule will be effective June 4, 2018 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by April 4, 2018. VI. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning, effective December 15, 2016. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov. VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator has the authority to approve section 112(l) submissions that comply with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. In reviewing section 112(l) submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria and objectives of the CAA and of EPA's implementing regulations. Accordingly, this action merely approves the State's request as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the submitted rule is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be effective June 4, 2018. VIII. Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 4, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and record keeping requirements. Dated: February 26, 2018. Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. 40 CFR part 63 is amended as follows: PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES 0 1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart A--General Provisions 0 2. Section 63.14 is amended by adding paragraph (l)(13) to read as follows: Sec. 63.14 Incorporations by reference. * * * * * (l) * * * (13) Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning, effective as of December 15, 2016. Incorporation by reference approved for Sec. 63.99(a). * * * * * Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal Authorities 0 3. Section 63.99 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(46) to read as follows: Sec. 63.99 Delegated Federal authorities. (a) * * * (46) Vermont. (i) Affected area sources within Vermont must comply with Vermont Regulations applicable to Hazardous Air Pollutants (incorporated [[Page 9219]] by reference as specified in Sec. 63.14) as described in paragraph (a)(46)(i)(A) of this section: (A) The material incorporated into the Vermont Air Pollution Regulations at Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning (effective as of December 15, 2016) pertaining to area source dry cleaning facilities in the State of Vermont jurisdiction, and approved under the procedures in Sec. 63.93 to be implemented and enforced in place of the requirements for area source dry cleaning facilities in the Federal NESHAP for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (subpart M of this part), effective as of July 11, 2008. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(46) the term ``area source dry cleaning facilities'' means any source that qualifies as an area source under Sec. 63.320(h). (1) Authorities not delegated. (i) Vermont is not delegated the Administrator's authority to implement and enforce Vermont Air Pollution Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section 5-253.11, in lieu of those provisions of subpart M of this part which apply to major sources, as defined in Sec. 63.320(g). (ii) [Reserved] (2) [Reserved] (B) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved] * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-04277 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 9215
Dated: February 7, 2018. Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), submissions, and general guidance on
Alexis Strauss, the VT DEC submitted a request for making effective comments, please visit
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. approval to implement and enforce the http://www.epa.gov/dockets/
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule of commenting-epa-dockets.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
the Vermont Air Pollution Control FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of Federal Regulations is amended as
Regulations as a partial substitution for Susan Lancey, Air Permits, Toxics, and
follows:
the National Emissions Standards for Indoor Programs Unit, U.S.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND Hazardous Air Pollutants for Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
PROMULGATION OF Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning New England Regional Office, 5 Post
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Facilities (Dry Cleaning NESHAP), as it Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail code
applies to area sources. EPA has OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 reviewed this request and has telephone number 617–918–1656,
continues to read as follows: determined that the Vermont lancey.susan@epa.gov.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
satisfies the requirements necessary for Throughout this document whenever
Subpart F—California partial rule substitution. Thus, EPA is ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
hereby granting VT DEC’s request. This EPA.
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by action does not affect the authority of
adding paragraph (c)(497)(i)(C) to read any party to implement and enforce the Table of Contents
as follows: Dry Cleaning NESHAP with respect to I. General Information
major source dry cleaners. This A. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule?
§ 52.220 Identification of plan-in part. approval makes the Vermont B. Does this direct final rule apply to me?
* * * * * Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Rule C. What should I consider as I prepare my
(c) * * * federally enforceable in Vermont. comments for the EPA?
(497) * * * II. Background
DATES: This direct final rule will be III. What requirements must a State rule meet
(i) * * * effective June 4, 2018, unless EPA to substitute for a Section 112 rule?
(C) Northern Sierra Air Quality receives adverse comments by April 4, IV. What if any material differences exist
Management District. 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, between the Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule
(1) City of Portola. EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of and the Dry Cleaning NESHAP and what
(i) Ordinance No. 344, Portola the direct final rule in the Federal is EPA’s evaluation?
Municipal Code, Chapter 15.10, ‘‘Wood Register informing the public that the A. What are the differences in
Stove and Fireplace Ordinance,’’ applicability?
rule will not take effect. The B. How does the Vermont Dry Cleaning
adopted June 22, 2016, except incorporation by reference of certain Rule address the control requirements?
paragraphs 15.10.060(B) and sections publications listed in the rule is C. How do the monitoring requirements
15.10.090 and 15.10.100. approved by the Director of the Federal differ?
* * * * * Register as of June 4, 2018. D. What are the differences in reporting
[FR Doc. 2018–04316 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am]
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
and recordkeeping?
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E. Is the State’s submittal separable?
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– F. What is EPA’s action regarding the
OAR–2017–0343 at http:// Vermont Dry Cleaning Rule?
www.regulations.gov, or via email to V. Final Action
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
lancey.susan@epa.gov. For comments VI. Incorporation by Reference
AGENCY VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting VIII. Judicial Reviews
40 CFR Part 63
comments. Once submitted, comments I. General Information
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0343; A–1–FRL– cannot be edited or removed from
9972–97–Region 1] Regulations.gov. For either manner of A. Why is the EPA using a direct final
submission, the EPA may publish any rule?
Approval of Section 112(l) Authority for
comment received to its public docket. The EPA is publishing this action
Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Do not submit electronically any without prior proposal because the
Perchloroethylene Air Emission
information you consider to be Agency views this as a noncontroversial
Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities;
Confidential Business Information (CBI) submittal and anticipates no adverse
State of Vermont
or other information whose disclosure is comments. However, in the proposed
AGENCY: Environmental Protection restricted by statute. Multimedia rules section of this Federal Register
Agency (EPA). submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be publication, EPA is publishing a
ACTION: Direct final rule. accompanied by a written comment. separate document that will serve as the
The written comment is considered the proposal to approve the state rule
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection official comment and should include should adverse comments be filed.
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final discussion of all points you wish to If the EPA receives such comments,
action to grant the Vermont Department make. The EPA will generally not then EPA will publish a notice
of Environmental Conservation (VT consider comments or comment withdrawing the direct final rule and
DEC) the authority to implement and contents located outside of the primary informing the public that the rule will
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
enforce, with respect to area sources submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or not take effect. All public comments
only, the Vermont Perchloroethylene other file sharing system). For received will then be addressed in a
Dry Cleaning Rule in place of the additional submission methods, please subsequent final rule based on the
National Emissions Standards for contact the person identified in the FOR proposed rule. The EPA will not
Hazardous Air Pollutants for FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. institute a second comment period on
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning For the full EPA public comment policy, the proposed rule. All parties interested
Facilities (Dry Cleaning NESHAP). information about CBI or multimedia in commenting on the proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:56 Mar 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM 05MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9258/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 9219
by reference as specified in § 63.14) as DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–
described in paragraph (a)(46)(i)(A) of 493–0665).
this section: Federal Railroad Administration SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(A) The material incorporated into the Background
49 CFR Part 225
Vermont Air Pollution Regulations at
Chapter 5, Air Pollution Control, section [FRA–2008–0136, Notice No. 10] A ‘‘rail equipment accident/incident’’
5–253.11, Perchloroethylene Dry is a collision, derailment, fire,
RIN 2130–ZA16 explosion, act of God, or other event
Cleaning (effective as of December 15,
2016) pertaining to area source dry Monetary Threshold for Reporting Rail involving the operation of railroad on-
Equipment Accidents/Incidents for track equipment (standing or moving)
cleaning facilities in the State of
Calendar Year 2018 that results in damages to railroad on-
Vermont jurisdiction, and approved
track equipment, signals, tracks, track
under the procedures in § 63.93 to be AGENCY: Federal Railroad structures, or roadbed, including labor
implemented and enforced in place of Administration (FRA), Department of costs and the costs for acquiring new
the requirements for area source dry Transportation (DOT). equipment and material, greater than
cleaning facilities in the Federal ACTION: Final rule. the reporting threshold for the year in
NESHAP for Perchloroethylene Dry which the event occurs. See 49 CFR
Cleaning Facilities (subpart M of this SUMMARY: FRA’s accident/incident 225.19(c). A railroad must report each
part), effective as of July 11, 2008. For reporting regulations require railroads to rail equipment accident/incident to FRA
purposes of this paragraph (a)(46) the report to the agency all rail equipment using the Rail Equipment Accident/
term ‘‘area source dry cleaning accidents/incidents above the monetary Incident Report (Form FRA F 6180.54).
facilities’’ means any source that reporting threshold (reporting See 49 CFR 225.19(b), (c), 225.21(a).
qualifies as an area source under threshold) for that calendar year (CY). Paragraphs (c) and (e) of 49 CFR 225.19
§ 63.320(h). There is no change to the CY 2017 further provide that FRA will adjust the
reporting threshold ($10,700) for CY dollar figure constituting the reporting
(1) Authorities not delegated. (i) 2018 as the overall increase in wages
Vermont is not delegated the threshold, if necessary, every year under
and equipment costs were not great the procedures in 49 CFR part 225
Administrator’s authority to implement enough to cause the threshold to change Appendix B to reflect any cost increases
and enforce Vermont Air Pollution when rounded to the nearest $100. or decreases.
Control Regulations, Chapter 5, Air DATES: This final rule is effective March Approximately one year has passed
Pollution Control, section 5–253.11, in 5, 2018. This final rule is applicable since FRA reviewed the reporting
lieu of those provisions of subpart M of January 1, 2018. threshold. See 81 FR 94271, Dec. 23,
this part which apply to major sources, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2016. Consequently, FRA has
as defined in § 63.320(g). Kebo Chen, Staff Director, U.S. recalculated the reporting threshold
(ii) [Reserved] Department of Transportation, Federal under 49 CFR 225.19(c), using updated
(2) [Reserved] Railroad Administration, Office of costs for labor and equipment. FRA has
Safety Analysis, RRS–22, Mail Stop 25, determined the current reporting
(B) [Reserved] West Building 3rd Floor, Room W33– threshold of $10,700, which applies to
(ii) [Reserved] 314, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, rail equipment accidents/incidents that
* * * * * Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202– occur during CY 2017, should remain
[FR Doc. 2018–04277 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am] 493–6079); or Senya Waas, Trial the same for rail equipment accidents/
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Attorney, U.S. Department of incidents that occur during CY 2018.
Transportation, Federal Railroad The specific inputs to the equation set
Administration, Office of Chief Counsel, forth in Appendix B (Tnew = Tprior *
RCC–10, West Building 3rd Floor, Room [1 + 0.4(Wnew ¥ Wprior)/Wprior +
W31–223, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, 0.6(Enew ¥ Eprior)/100]) are:
Tprior Wnew Wprior Enew Eprior
$10,700 $29.77918 $29.99942 203.83333 203.33333
Where: $10,700.64, which is rounded to the FRA intends to publish a rulemaking
Tnew = New threshold; nearest $100 for a final reporting (RIN 2130–AC49) to reexamine its
Tprior = Prior threshold (with reference to threshold of $10,700 for CY 2018.1 method for calculating the reporting
the threshold, ‘‘prior’’ refers to the threshold in 2018 because more
previous threshold rounded to the 1 Wage statistics are available from the Surface
nearest $100, as reported in the Federal
accurate methodologies for calculating
Transportation Board (STB), ‘‘Quarterly Wage Form
Register); A&B,’’ at https://www.stb.gov/stb/industry/econ_ the threshold are available. FRA
Wnew = New average hourly wage rate, in reports.html (visited December 5, 2017). The believes updating its methodology will
dollars; average hourly wage rate is determined by dividing ensure the reporting threshold reflects
Wprior = Prior average hourly wage rate, in the compensation for time worked at straight time
changes in equipment and labor costs as
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
rates by the service hours worked at straight time
dollars; rates (yielding dollars per hour). FRA averages the accurately as possible.
Enew = New equipment average Producer second-quarter data reported for the Group No. 300
Price Index (PPI) value; Maintenance of Way and Structures employees, and
Eprior = Prior equipment average PPI value. the Group No. 400 Maintenance of Equipment and www.bls.gov/ppi/ (visited December 5, 2017). Select
Stores employees. Group 14 Transportation Equipment, then Item 144
See 49 CFR part 225 Appendix B. Using The equipment PPI is available at the Bureau of Railroad Equipment, followed by checking Not
the above figures, the calculated new Labor Statistics (BLS), U.S. Department of Labor, Seasonally Adjusted. The complete Series ID is
threshold, represented as Tnew, is ‘‘PPI Databases: Commodity Data,’ at https:// WPU144, base date 1982.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:56 Mar 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM 05MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_9258/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-03 02:45:35
Document Modified: 2018-03-03 02:45:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective June 4, 2018, unless EPA receives adverse comments by April 4, 2018. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 4, 2018. | |
| Contact | Susan Lancey, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number 617-918-1656, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 9215 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Hazardous Substances; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR