83 FR 9245 - Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches, Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 43 (March 5, 2018)

Page Range		9245-9247
FR Document		2018-04367

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters of Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches in Charleston, South Carolina during the Cooper River Bridge Run. The Cooper River Bridge Run is a 10-K run across the Arthur Ravenel Bridge. The safety zone is necessary for the safety of the runners and the general public during this event. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9245-9247]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04367]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0032]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Cooper River, and Town 
Creek Reaches, Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the 
waters of Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches in Charleston, South 
Carolina during the Cooper River Bridge Run. The Cooper River Bridge 
Run is a 10-K run across the Arthur Ravenel Bridge. The safety zone is 
necessary for the safety of the runners and the general public during 
this event. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels 
from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within 
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston 
or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this 
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before March 20, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0032 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector 
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 
740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 11, 2018, the Coast Guard was notified by the City of 
Charleston about the Cooper River Bridge 10-K Run, which will be held 
on April 7, 2018, and will impact waters of the Cooper River and Town 
Creek Reaches in Charleston, South Carolina. The purpose of this 
proposed rule is to ensure the safety of the runners, the general 
public, and vessels on the navigable waters during the scheduled event.
    The Coast Guard is requesting that interested parties provide 
comments within a shortened comment period of 15 days instead of a 
standard 30 days for this notice of proposed rulemaking.
    The Coast Guard believes a shortened comment period is necessary 
and reasonable because the safety zone is necessary to ensure the 
safety of event participants, the general public, vessels and these 
navigable waters during the race. Any delay in making this final rule 
effective by allowing comments for more than 15 days would not be in 
the best interest of public safety.
    The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 
U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters 
of the Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches in Charleston, South 
Carolina from 7:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on April 7, 2018, during the 
Cooper River Bridge Run. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure 
the safety of event participants,

[[Page 9246]]

the general public, vessels and these navigable waters during the race 
scheduled from 7:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. Approximately 40,000 runners are 
anticipated to participate in the race. No vessel or person would be 
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from 
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. The 
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on: (1) The safety 
zone will only be enforced for a total of three hours; (2) although 
persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the safety zone without authorization from the Captain of 
the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they may operate in 
the surrounding area during the enforcement period; and (3) the Coast 
Guard will provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local 
maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as 
amended requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-
profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are 
not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with 
populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have 
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. This 
rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be small 
entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to enter, transit 
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area during the 
enforcement period. For the reasons discussed in Regulatory Planning 
and Review section above, this rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves a safety zone prohibiting vessel traffic from a limited area 
surrounding the Cooper River Bridge on the waters of the Cooper River 
and Town Creek Reaches for a 3 hour period. Normally such actions are 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60 of 
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A 
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this 
determination is available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

[[Page 9247]]

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.35T07-0032 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0032  Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Charleston 
SC.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Cooper River, and Town Creek 
Reaches encompassed within the following points: beginning at 
32[deg]48'32'' N, 079[deg]56'08'' W, thence east to 32[deg]48'20'' N, 
079[deg]54'20'' W, thence south to 32[deg]47'20'' N, 079[deg]54'29'' W, 
thence west to 32[deg]47'20'' N, 079[deg]55'28'' W, thence north to 
origin. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated 
areas.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, 
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated 
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a 
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or 
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port 
Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative 
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization 
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is 
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization 
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston 
or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by 
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene 
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This proposed rule will be enforced from 
7:30 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on April 7, 2018.

    Dated: February 27, 2018.
John W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018-04367 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules 9245

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace eRulemaking Portal at http://
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation Designated as an Extension to a Class D www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Surface Area. Participation and Request for
Since this is a routine matter that will * * * * * Comments’’ portion of the
only affect air traffic procedures and air ASO NC E4 Jacksonville, NC [Amended] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
navigation, it is certified that this further instructions on submitting
New River MCAS, NC
proposed rule, when promulgated, will (Lat. 34°42′30″ N, long. 77°26′23″ W)
comments.
not have a significant economic impact New River TACAN FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
on a substantial number of small entities (Lat. 34°42′26″ N, long. 77°26′25″ W) you have questions about this proposed
under the criteria of the Regulatory That airspace extending upward from the rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Flexibility Act. surface within 3.2 miles each side of New Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of
Environmental Review River TACAN 239° radial, extending from the Waterways Management, Coast Guard;
5-mile radius of New River MCAS to 7 miles telephone (843) 740–3184, email
This proposal would be subject to an southwest of the TACAN. This Class E
Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil.
environmental analysis in accordance airspace area is effective during the specific
days and times established in advance by a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
Notice to Airmen. The effective days and
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and I. Table of Abbreviations
times will thereafter be continuously
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final published in the Chart Supplement. CFR Code of Federal Regulations
regulatory action. DHS Department of Homeland Security
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on
E.O. Executive order
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 February 23, 2018.
FR Federal Register
Ryan W. Almasy, NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Pub. L. Public Law
Navigation (air).
Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. § Section
The Proposed Amendment [FR Doc. 2018–04326 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am] U.S.C. United States Code
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
COTP Captain of the Port
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as Basis
follows: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
On January 11, 2018, the Coast Guard
SECURITY
was notified by the City of Charleston
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, about the Cooper River Bridge 10–K
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR Coast Guard
Run, which will be held on April 7,
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 2018, and will impact waters of the
REPORTING POINTS 33 CFR Part 165
Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0032] in Charleston, South Carolina. The
■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 purpose of this proposed rule is to
RIN 1625–AA00
continues to read as follows: ensure the safety of the runners, the
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, general public, and vessels on the
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, Cooper River, and Town Creek navigable waters during the scheduled
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. Reaches, Charleston, SC event.
The Coast Guard is requesting that
§ 71.1 [Amended] AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. interested parties provide comments
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. within a shortened comment period of
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 15 days instead of a standard 30 days for
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
Administration Order 7400.11B, this notice of proposed rulemaking.
establish a safety zone on the waters of
Airspace Designations and Reporting The Coast Guard believes a shortened
Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches
Points, dated August 3, 2017, and comment period is necessary and
in Charleston, South Carolina during the
effective September 15, 2017, is reasonable because the safety zone is
Cooper River Bridge Run. The Cooper
amended as follows: necessary to ensure the safety of event
River Bridge Run is a 10–K run across
Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace. the Arthur Ravenel Bridge. The safety participants, the general public, vessels
zone is necessary for the safety of the and these navigable waters during the
* * * * *
runners and the general public during race. Any delay in making this final rule
ASO NC D Jacksonville, NC [Amended] effective by allowing comments for
this event. This proposed rulemaking
New River MCAS, NC would prohibit persons and vessels more than 15 days would not be in the
(Lat. 34°42′30″ N, long. 77°26′23″ W) from entering, transiting through, best interest of public safety.
Albert J. Ellis Airport, NC
anchoring in, or remaining within the The Coast Guard proposes this
(Lat. 34°49′45″ N, long. 77°36′44″ W) rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
safety zone unless authorized by the
That airspace extending upward from the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a 1231.
surface to and including 2,500 feet MSL
within a 5-mile radius of New River MCAS, designated representative. We invite III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

and that airspace extending upward from the your comments on this proposed The Coast Guard proposes to establish
surface to and including 2,600 feet MSL rulemaking. a safety zone on the waters of the
within a 4.2-mile radius of Albert J. Ellis DATES: Comments and related material Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches
Airport. This Class D airspace area is must be received by the Coast Guard on
effective during the specific days and times
in Charleston, South Carolina from 7:30
established in advance by a Notice to
or before March 20, 2018. a.m. to 10:30 a.m. on April 7, 2018,
Airmen. The effective days and times will ADDRESSES: You may submit comments during the Cooper River Bridge Run.
thereafter be continuously published in the identified by docket number USCG– The duration of the zone is intended to
Chart Supplement. 2018–0032 using the Federal ensure the safety of event participants,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Mar 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM 05MRP1

9246 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Proposed Rules

the general public, vessels and these a substantial number of small entities. between the Federal Government and
navigable waters during the race We have considered the impact of this Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
scheduled from 7:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. proposed rule on small entities. This power and responsibilities between the
Approximately 40,000 runners are rule may affect the following entities, Federal Government and Indian tribes.
anticipated to participate in the race. No some of which may be small entities: If you believe this proposed rule has
vessel or person would be permitted to the owner or operators of vessels implications for federalism or Indian
enter the safety zone without obtaining intending to enter, transit through, tribes, please contact the person
permission from the Captain of the Port anchor in, or remain within the
Charleston or a designated regulated area during the enforcement E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
representative. The regulatory text we period. For the reasons discussed in
are proposing appears at the end of this Regulatory Planning and Review section The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
document. above, this rule will not have a of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
significant economic impact on a Federal agencies to assess the effects of
IV. Regulatory Analyses their discretionary regulatory actions. In
substantial number of small entities.
We developed this proposed rule after If you think that your business, particular, the Act addresses actions
considering numerous statutes and organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
executive orders related to rulemaking. jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity State, local, or tribal government, in the
Below we summarize our analyses and that this rule would have a aggregate, or by the private sector of
based on a number of these statutes and significant economic impact on it, $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
executive orders. please submit a comment (see more in any one year. Though this
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it proposed rule would not result in such
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
qualifies and how and to what degree an expenditure, we do discuss the
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 this rule would economically affect it. effects of this rule elsewhere in this
direct agencies to assess the costs and Under section 213(a) of the Small
benefits of available regulatory preamble.
Business Regulatory Enforcement
alternatives and, if regulation is Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), F. Environment
necessary, to select regulatory we want to assist small entities in
approaches that maximize net benefits. understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
to control regulatory costs through a organization, or governmental Security Directive 023–01, which guides
budgeting process. This NPRM has not jurisdiction and you have questions the Coast Guard in complying with the
been designated a ‘‘significant concerning its provisions or options for National Environmental Policy Act of
regulatory action,’’ under Executive compliance, please contact the person 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION made a preliminary determination that
has not been reviewed by the Office of CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will this action is one of a category of actions
Management and Budget (OMB), and not retaliate against small entities that that do not individually or cumulatively
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt question or complain about this have a significant effect on the human
from the requirements of Executive proposed rule or any policy or action of environment. This proposed rule
Order 13771. the Coast Guard. involves a safety zone prohibiting vessel
This regulatory action determination
C. Collection of Information traffic from a limited area surrounding
is based on: (1) The safety zone will
the Cooper River Bridge on the waters
only be enforced for a total of three This proposed rule would not call for
of the Cooper River and Town Creek
hours; (2) although persons and vessels a new collection of information under
may not enter, transit through, anchor Reaches for a 3 hour period. Normally
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
in, or remain within the safety zone such actions are categorically excluded
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
without authorization from the Captain from further review under paragraph
of the Port Charleston or a designated D. Federalism and Indian Tribal L60 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
representative, they may operate in the Governments Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
surrounding area during the A rule has implications for federalism Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of
enforcement period; and (3) the Coast under Executive Order 13132, Environmental Consideration
Guard will provide advance notification Federalism, if it has a substantial direct supporting this determination is
of the safety zone to the local maritime effect on the States, on the relationship available in the docket where indicated
community by Local Notice to Mariners between the national government and under ADDRESSES. We seek any
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. the States, or on the distribution of comments or information that may lead
power and responsibilities among the to the discovery of a significant
B. Impact on Small Entities various levels of government. We have environmental impact from this
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this proposed rule under that proposed rule.
1980, (5 U.S.C. 601–612), as amended Order and have determined that it is
requires Federal agencies to consider consistent with the fundamental G. Protest Activities
the potential impact of regulations on federalism principles and preemption
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small The Coast Guard respects the First
requirements described in Executive
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

businesses, not-for-profit organizations Amendment rights of protesters.
Order 13132.
that are independently owned and Also, this proposed rule does not have Protesters are asked to contact the
operated and are not dominant in their tribal implications under Executive person listed in the FOR FURTHER
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Order 13175, Consultation and INFORMATION CONTACT section to
with populations of less than 50,000. Coordination with Indian Tribal coordinate protest activities so that your
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Governments, because it would not have message can be received without
605(b) that this proposed rule would not a substantial direct effect on one or jeopardizing the safety or security of
have a significant economic impact on more Indian tribes, on the relationship people, places, or vessels.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Mar 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM 05MRP1

Document Created: 2018-03-03 02:46:06
Document Modified: 2018-03-03 02:46:06

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before March 20, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 9245
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 9245 - Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches, Charleston, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 43 (March 5, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard