83_FR_9317 83 FR 9274 - Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination

83 FR 9274 - Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 43 (March 5, 2018)

Page Range9274-9277
FR Document2018-04402

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016. For information on the estimated subsidy rates, see the ``Final Determination and Suspension of Liquidation'' section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9274-9277]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-054]


Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil From 
the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters 
of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the People's Republic of 
China (China). The period of investigation is January 1, 2016, through 
December 31, 2016. For information on the estimated subsidy rates, see 
the ``Final Determination and Suspension of Liquidation'' section of 
this notice.

DATES: Applicable March 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yasmin Bordas, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3813.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Determination on August 14, 
2017.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published 
the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the 
issues raised by

[[Page 9275]]

parties for this final determination, may be found in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum \2\ issued concurrently with this notice. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and 
is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of 
the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic version are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 82 
FR 37844 (August 14, 2017) (Preliminary Determination) and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of 
Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China,'' dated 
concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope Comments

    We invited parties to comment on Commerce's Preliminary Scope 
Memorandum.\3\ Commerce has reviewed the briefs submitted by interested 
parties, considered the arguments therein, and has made changes to the 
scope of the investigation. For further discussion, see Commerce's 
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's 
Republic of China: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the 
Preliminary Determinations,'' dated October 26, 2017, and filed to 
ACCESS on October 30, 2017.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Scope Decision Memorandum,'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation 
in accordance with section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we 
determine that there is a subsidy (i.e., a financial contribution by an 
``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient) and that 
the subsidy is specific. For a full description of the methodology 
underlying our final determination, see the Issues and Decisions 
Memorandum.

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is aluminum foil from 
China. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, 
see Appendix II.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, in November 2017, we 
conducted verification of the questionnaire responses submitted by 
Dingsheng Aluminum (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd. (Dingsheng HK) and 
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (Zhongji). We issued 
verification reports on November 25, 2017.\5\ We used standard 
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant 
accounting and financial records, and original source documents 
provided by Dingsheng HK and Zhongji.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Commerce Memoranda, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., 
Ltd.: Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil 
from the People's Republic of China,'' (Dingsheng Verification 
Report) and ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Jiangsu 
Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.: Countervailing Duty 
Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of 
China,'' (Zhongji Verification Report), both dated November 25, 
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received

    The subsidy programs under investigation, and the issues raised in 
the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by the parties, are discussed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum, is attached to this notice at Appendix I.

Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)

    For purposes of this final determination, we relied on facts 
available, and because certain respondents did not act to the best of 
their ability in responding to Commerce's requests for information, we 
drew an adverse inference, where appropriate, in selecting from among 
the facts otherwise available.\6\ The subsidy rates for Loften Aluminum 
(Hong Kong) Limited and Manakin Industries, LLC, are based totally on 
AFA. A full discussion of our decision to rely on adverse facts 
available is presented in the ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 
Adverse Inferences'' section of the Issues and Decisions Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from 
parties, and minor corrections presented at verification, we made 
certain changes to the respondents' subsidy rate calculations since the 
Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of these changes, see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum and the Final Calculation Memoranda.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memoranda, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of 
Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Determination Calculation Memorandum for Dingsheng Aluminum (Hong 
Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.,'' dated February 26, 2018 (Dingsheng Final 
Calculation Memorandum) and ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of 
Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Determination Calculation Memorandum for Zhongji Lamination 
Materials Co., Ltd,'' dated February 26, 2018 (Zhongji Final 
Calculation Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

All-Others Rate

    In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we 
calculated an individual rate for each producer/exporter of the subject 
merchandise individually investigated.
    In accordance with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for companies 
not individually investigated, we apply an ``all-others'' rate, which 
is normally calculated by weighting the subsidy rates of the individual 
companies selected as mandatory respondents by those companies' exports 
of the subject merchandise to the United States. Under section 
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the ``all-others'' rate excludes zero and 
de minimis rates calculated for the exporters and producers 
individually investigated as well as rates based entirely on facts 
otherwise available. Where the rates for the individually investigated 
companies are all zero or de minimis, or determined entirely using 
facts otherwise available, section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act 
instructs Commerce to establish an ``all-others'' rate using ``any 
reasonable method.''
    Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we have calculated 
the ``all-others'' rate using the subsidy rates of Dingsheng HK and 
Zhongji, the only two mandatory respondents not receiving a subsidy 
rate based totally on section 776 of the Act. However, we have not 
calculated the ``all-others'' rate by weight-averaging these two rates 
because doing so risks disclosure of proprietary information. 
Therefore, and consistent with Commerce's practice, for the ``all-
others'' rate, we calculated a simple average of these two mandatory 
respondents' subsidy rates.

Final Determination

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                         Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dingsheng Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co.,             19.98
 Ltd.\8\................................................
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.\9\.......           17.14
Loften Aluminum (Hong Kong) Limited.....................           80.97
Manakin Industries, LLC \10\............................           80.97

[[Page 9276]]

 
All-Others..............................................           18.56
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with 
Dingsheng HK: Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; 
Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Five Star Aluminum 
Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Longding 
Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd.; 
Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) 
Trading Co., Limited.
    \9\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with 
Zhongji: Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu 
Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.; and Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination 
Materials Co., (HK) Ltd.
    \10\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce finds that Manakin Industries and Suzhou Manakin Aluminum 
Processing Technology Co., Ltd., effectively function by joint 
operation as a trading company. Therefore, the rate for Manakin 
Industries also applies to Suzhou Manakin Aluminum Processing 
Technology Co., Ltd. For additional information, see Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum and Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding the 
calculations performed for this final determination within five days of 
the date of public announcement of our final determination, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Suspension of Liquidation

    As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to 
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act, we instructed U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of 
merchandise under consideration from the PRC that were entered or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after August 14, 2017, 
the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal 
Register. In accordance with section 703(d) of the Act, on December 12, 
2017, we instructed CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation of 
all entries at that time.
    If the U.S. International Trade Commission (the ITC) issues a final 
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a CVD order, will 
reinstate the suspension of liquidation under section 706(a) of the 
Act, and will require a cash deposit of estimated CVDs for such entries 
of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above. If the ITC 
determines that material injury, or threat of material injury, does not 
exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all estimated duties 
deposited or securities posted as a result of the suspension of 
liquidation will be refunded or canceled.

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the 
ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the 
ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this 
investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and 
business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC 
confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or 
under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written 
consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information

    In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, 
this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of 
their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: February 26, 2018.
Prentiss Lee Smith,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Application of the Countervailing Duty Law to Imports from the 
PRC
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Benchmarks and Discount Rates
VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
IX. Analysis of Programs
X. Analysis of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in Its Treatment of Manakin
    Comment 2: Whether the Record Supports a Finding of Policy 
Lending
    Comment 3: Whether Chinese Commercial Banks Are Government 
Authorities
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce's Policy Lending Benchmark Interest 
Rate Computations Are Supported by the Record and Lawful
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce's Investigation of Uninitiated 
Programs Is Lawful
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Change Its Export Buyer's 
Credit Determination
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Use the USD Interest Rate 
Benchmark for Hong Kong Loans
    Comment 8: Whether Loans Issued in Hong Kong to Hong Kong 
Companies Are Countervailable
    Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Revise Dingsheng's Sales 
Denominator
    Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Correct Calculation Errors 
for Dingsheng's Loans
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Correct Calculation Errors 
for Dingsheng's Aluminum and Coal Purchases
    Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Place Interest Rate 
Benchmarks on the Record That Are Contemporaneous to the POI
    Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should Rely on AFA for Subsidies 
Discovered at Zhongji's Verification
    Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Grant Zhongji an Export 
Value Adjustment
    Comment 15: Whether Commerce Improperly Rejected Dingsheng's 
Benchmark Data
    Comment 16: Whether Commerce Should Revise the Benchmarks for 
Primary Aluminum
    Comment 17: Whether the GOC Provided Sufficient Evidence To Find 
That Input Suppliers Were Not Government Authorities
    Comment 18: Whether CCP Affiliations or Activities by Company 
Officials Make a Company a Government Authority
    Comment 19: Whether the Primary Aluminum and Steam Coal for LTAR 
Programs Are Specific
    Comment 20: Whether Commerce Must Use a Tier-One Benchmark for 
the Primary Aluminum and Steam Coal for LTAR Programs
    Comment 21: Whether Dingsheng's Income Tax Deductions for R&D 
Expenses Are Understated
    Comment 22: Whether Commerce Selected the Highest Electricity 
Rate Benchmarks
    Comment 23: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA for Electricity

[[Page 9277]]

    Comment 24: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the Electricity 
Benchmark for VAT
    Comment 25: Whether Electricity Constitutes General 
Infrastructure and Provides a Financial Contribution
    Comment 26: Whether Commerce Should Rely on Xeneta Data for 
Freight Benchmark
    Comment 27: Whether Commerce Should Find Non-Use of Steam Coal
XI. Recommendation

Appendix II

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is aluminum foil 
having a thickness of 0.2 mm or less, in reels exceeding 25 pounds, 
regardless of width. Aluminum foil is made from an aluminum alloy 
that contains more than 92 percent aluminum. Aluminum foil may be 
made to ASTM specification ASTM B479, but can also be made to other 
specifications. Regardless of specification, however, all aluminum 
foil meeting the scope description is included in the scope, 
including aluminum foil to which lubricant has been applied to one 
or both sides of the foil.
    Excluded from the scope of this investigation is aluminum foil 
that is backed with paper, paperboard, plastics, or similar backing 
materials on one side or both sides of the aluminum foil, as well as 
etched capacitor foil and aluminum foil that is cut to shape.
    Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set forth above. The products under investigation are currently 
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings 7607.11.3000, 7607.11.6000, 7607.11.9030, 
7607.11.9060, 7607.11.9090, and 7607.19.6000. Further, merchandise 
that falls within the scope of this proceeding may also be entered 
into the United States under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3060, 
7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3045, 7606.12.3055, 7606.12.3090, 
7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3090, 7606.91.6080, 7606.92.3090, and 
7606.92.6080.
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this 
proceeding is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2018-04402 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                9274                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices

                                                bed units; 18 (16) certain shoe                         mirrors . . . framed.’’ The order covers                APO in accordance with the procedures
                                                cabinets; 19 and (17) certain bed bases.20              all wooden bedroom furniture meeting                    outlined in Commerce’s regulations at
                                                  Imports of subject merchandise are                    the above description, regardless of                    19 CFR 351.305. Those procedures
                                                classified under subheadings                            tariff classification. Although the                     apply to this segment of the proceeding,
                                                9403.50.9042 and 9403.50.9045 of the                    HTSUS subheadings are provided for                      with one exception: APO applicants
                                                HTSUS as ‘‘wooden . . . beds’’ and                      convenience and customs purposes, our                   representing the parties that have been
                                                under subheading 9403.50.9080 of the                    written description of the scope of this                identified by CBP as an importer in the
                                                HTSUS as ‘‘other . . . wooden furniture                 proceeding is dispositive.                              covered merchandise referral
                                                of a kind used in the bedroom.’’ In                                                                             (referenced above) are exempt from the
                                                                                                        Filing Requirements
                                                addition, wooden headboards for beds,                                                                           additional filing requirements for
                                                wooden footboards for beds, wooden                         All submissions to Commerce must be                  importers pursuant to 19 CFR
                                                side rails for beds, and wooden canopies                filed electronically using ACCESS.21 An                 351.305(d).
                                                for beds may be entered under                           electronically filed document must be
                                                                                                                                                                  Dated: February 22, 2018.
                                                subheadings 9403.90.7005 or                             received successfully in its entirety by
                                                                                                                                                                Christian Marsh,
                                                9403.90.7080 of the HTSUS. Subject                      the time and date it is due. Documents
                                                                                                        exempted from the electronic                            Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
                                                merchandise may also be entered under                                                                           and Compliance.
                                                subheadings 9403.50.9041,                               submission requirements must be filed
                                                                                                                                                                [FR Doc. 2018–04392 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am]
                                                9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, or                          manually (i.e., in paper form) with
                                                                                                        Enforcement and Compliance’s APO/                       BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                9403.90.8041. Further, framed glass
                                                mirrors may be entered under                            Dockets Unit, Room 18022, U.S.
                                                subheading 7009.92.1000 or                              Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                                                                        Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,                     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as ‘‘glass
                                                                                                        DC 20230, and stamped with the date of                  International Trade Administration
                                                generally designed for the purpose of storing           receipt by the applicable deadlines.
                                                children’s items such as toys, books, and                                                                       [C–570–054]
                                                playthings. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from           Letters of Appearance and
                                                the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of        Administrative Protective Order                         Countervailing Duty Investigation of
                                                Changed Circumstances Review and Determination                                                                  Certain Aluminum Foil From the
                                                to Revoke Order in Part, 74 FR 8506 (February 25,          Interested parties that wish to
                                                2009). Further, as determined in the scope ruling       participate in this segment of the                      People’s Republic of China: Final
                                                memorandum ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from              proceeding and be added to the public                   Affirmative Determination
                                                the People’s Republic of China: Scope Ruling on a
                                                White Toy Box,’’ dated July 6, 2009, the
                                                                                                        service list for this segment of the                    AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                dimensional ranges used to identify the toy boxes       proceeding must file a letter of                        International Trade Administration,
                                                that are excluded from the wooden bedroom               appearance in accordance with 19 CFR                    Department of Commerce.
                                                furniture order apply to the box itself rather than     351.103(d)(1), with one exception: the
                                                the lid.                                                                                                        SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                                   18 Excluded from the scope are certain enclosable
                                                                                                        parties publicly identified by CBP in the               (Commerce) determines that
                                                wall bed units, also referred to as murphy beds,        covered merchandise referral                            countervailable subsidies are being
                                                which are composed of the following three major         (referenced above) are not required to                  provided to producers and exporters of
                                                sections: (1) A metal wall frame, which attaches to     submit a letter of appearance, and will                 certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil)
                                                the wall and uses coils or pistons to support the       be added to the public service list for
                                                metal mattress frame; (2) a metal frame, which has                                                              from the People’s Republic of China
                                                euro slats for supporting a mattress and two legs       this segment of the proceeding by                       (China). The period of investigation is
                                                that pivot; and (3) wood panels, which attach to the    Commerce.                                               January 1, 2016, through December 31,
                                                metal wall frame and/or the metal mattress frame           Commerce placed an APO on the
                                                to form a cabinet to enclose the wall bed when not                                                              2016. For information on the estimated
                                                                                                        record on January 11, 2018,22 and
                                                in use. Excluded enclosable wall bed units are                                                                  subsidy rates, see the ‘‘Final
                                                                                                        established the APO service list for use
                                                imported in ready-to-assemble format with all parts                                                             Determination and Suspension of
                                                necessary for assembly. Enclosable wall bed units       in this segment. Commerce intends to
                                                                                                                                                                Liquidation’’ section of this notice.
                                                do not include a mattress. Wood panels of               place the business proprietary versions
                                                enclosable wall bed units, when imported                                                                        DATES: Applicable March 5, 2018.
                                                                                                        of the documents contained in the
                                                separately, remain subject to the order.
                                                                                                        covered merchandise referral on the                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                   19 Excluded from the scope are certain shoe
                                                                                                        record of this proceeding in ACCESS                     Yasmin Bordas, AD/CVD Operations,
                                                cabinets 31.5–33.5 inches wide by 15.5–17.5 inches
                                                deep by 34.5–36.5 inches high. They are designed        within five days of publication of this                 Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                strictly to store shoes, which are intended to be       notice.                                                 International Trade Administration,
                                                aligned in rows perpendicular to the wall along            Interested parties must submit                       U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
                                                which the cabinet is positioned. Shoe cabinets do                                                               Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
                                                not have drawers, rods, or other indicia for the        applications for disclosure under the
                                                storage of clothing other than shoes. The cabinets
                                                                                                                                                                DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3813.
                                                are not designed, manufactured, or offered for sale       21 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                in coordinated groups or sets and are made              Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
                                                substantially of wood, have two to four shelves         Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR       Background
                                                inside them, and are covered by doors. The doors        39263 (July 6, 2011), as amended in Enforcement
                                                often have blinds that are designed to allow air        and Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing
                                                                                                                                                                  Commerce published the Preliminary
                                                circulation and release of bad odors. The doors         System Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014) for        Determination on August 14, 2017.1 A
                                                themselves may be made of wood or glass. The            details of Commerce’s electronic filing                 summary of the events that occurred
                                                depth of the shelves does not exceed 14 inches.         requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information     since Commerce published the
                                                Each shoe cabinet has doors, adjustable shelving,       on help using ACCESS can be found at https://
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                and ventilation holes.                                  access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook can be
                                                                                                                                                                Preliminary Determination, as well as a
                                                   20 Excluded from the scope are certain bed bases     found at https://access.trade.gov/help/                 full discussion of the issues raised by
                                                consisting of: (1) A wooden box frame, (2) three        Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filing%20
                                                wooden cross beams and one perpendicular center         Procedures.pdf.                                           1 See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s

                                                wooden support beam, and (3) wooden slats over            22 See the Administrative Protective Order ‘‘In the   Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
                                                the beams. These bed bases are constructed without      Matter of the Scope Inquiry of the Antidumping          Countervailing Duty Determination, 82 FR 37844
                                                inner springs and/or coils and do not include a         Duty Order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the         (August 14, 2017) (Preliminary Determination) and
                                                headboard, footboard, side rails, or mattress. The      People’s Republic of China (A–570–890) (CBP             accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
                                                bed bases are imported unassembled.                     EAPA Inv. No. 7189)’’, dated January 11, 2018.          (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:25 Mar 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00016   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM    05MRN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices                                                             9275

                                                parties for this final determination, may               Verification                                          Memorandum and the Final Calculation
                                                be found in the Issues and Decision                       As provided in section 782(i) of the                Memoranda.7
                                                Memorandum 2 issued concurrently                        Act, in November 2017, we conducted                   All-Others Rate
                                                with this notice. The Issues and                        verification of the questionnaire
                                                Decision Memorandum is a public                                                                                  In accordance with section
                                                                                                        responses submitted by Dingsheng
                                                document and is on file electronically                                                                        705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we calculated
                                                                                                        Aluminum (Hong Kong) Trading Co.,
                                                via Enforcement and Compliance’s                                                                              an individual rate for each producer/
                                                                                                        Ltd. (Dingsheng HK) and Jiangsu
                                                Antidumping and Countervailing Duty                                                                           exporter of the subject merchandise
                                                                                                        Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.
                                                Centralized Electronic Service System                                                                         individually investigated.
                                                                                                        (Zhongji). We issued verification reports                In accordance with section
                                                (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to                        on November 25, 2017.5 We used
                                                registered users at http://                                                                                   705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for companies
                                                                                                        standard verification procedures,                     not individually investigated, we apply
                                                access.trade.gov, and is available to all               including an examination of relevant
                                                parties in the Central Records Unit,                                                                          an ‘‘all-others’’ rate, which is normally
                                                                                                        accounting and financial records, and                 calculated by weighting the subsidy
                                                Room B8024 of the main Department of                    original source documents provided by
                                                Commerce building. In addition, a                                                                             rates of the individual companies
                                                                                                        Dingsheng HK and Zhongji.                             selected as mandatory respondents by
                                                complete version of the Issues and
                                                Decision Memorandum can be accessed                     Analysis of Subsidy Programs and                      those companies’ exports of the subject
                                                directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/               Comments Received                                     merchandise to the United States. Under
                                                frn/. The signed Issues and Decision                      The subsidy programs under                          section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, the
                                                Memorandum and the electronic                           investigation, and the issues raised in               ‘‘all-others’’ rate excludes zero and de
                                                version are identical in content.                       the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by             minimis rates calculated for the
                                                                                                        the parties, are discussed in the Issues              exporters and producers individually
                                                Scope Comments                                                                                                investigated as well as rates based
                                                                                                        and Decision Memorandum. A list of
                                                  We invited parties to comment on                      the issues that parties raised, and to                entirely on facts otherwise available.
                                                Commerce’s Preliminary Scope                            which we responded in the Issues and                  Where the rates for the individually
                                                Memorandum.3 Commerce has                               Decision Memorandum, is attached to                   investigated companies are all zero or
                                                reviewed the briefs submitted by                        this notice at Appendix I.                            de minimis, or determined entirely
                                                interested parties, considered the                                                                            using facts otherwise available, section
                                                arguments therein, and has made                         Use of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)                  705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act instructs
                                                changes to the scope of the                                For purposes of this final                         Commerce to establish an ‘‘all-others’’
                                                investigation. For further discussion, see              determination, we relied on facts                     rate using ‘‘any reasonable method.’’
                                                Commerce’s Final Scope Decision                         available, and because certain                           Pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of
                                                Memorandum.4                                            respondents did not act to the best of                the Act, we have calculated the ‘‘all-
                                                                                                        their ability in responding to                        others’’ rate using the subsidy rates of
                                                Methodology                                                                                                   Dingsheng HK and Zhongji, the only
                                                                                                        Commerce’s requests for information,
                                                  Commerce is conducting this                           we drew an adverse inference, where                   two mandatory respondents not
                                                countervailing duty (CVD) investigation                 appropriate, in selecting from among the              receiving a subsidy rate based totally on
                                                in accordance with section 701 of the                                                                         section 776 of the Act. However, we
                                                                                                        facts otherwise available.6 The subsidy
                                                Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act).                                                                         have not calculated the ‘‘all-others’’ rate
                                                                                                        rates for Loften Aluminum (Hong Kong)
                                                For each of the subsidy programs found                                                                        by weight-averaging these two rates
                                                                                                        Limited and Manakin Industries, LLC,
                                                to be countervailable, we determine that                                                                      because doing so risks disclosure of
                                                                                                        are based totally on AFA. A full
                                                there is a subsidy (i.e., a financial                                                                         proprietary information. Therefore, and
                                                                                                        discussion of our decision to rely on
                                                contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that                                                                         consistent with Commerce’s practice,
                                                                                                        adverse facts available is presented in
                                                gives rise to a benefit to the recipient)                                                                     for the ‘‘all-others’’ rate, we calculated
                                                                                                        the ‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available
                                                and that the subsidy is specific. For a                                                                       a simple average of these two mandatory
                                                                                                        and Adverse Inferences’’ section of the
                                                full description of the methodology                                                                           respondents’ subsidy rates.
                                                                                                        Issues and Decisions Memorandum.
                                                underlying our final determination, see
                                                                                                        Changes Since the Preliminary                         Final Determination
                                                the Issues and Decisions Memorandum.
                                                                                                        Determination
                                                Scope of the Investigation                                                                                                 Company                        Subsidy rate
                                                                                                          Based on our review and analysis of                                                              (percent)
                                                  The merchandise covered by this
                                                                                                        the comments received from parties,
                                                investigation is aluminum foil from                                                                           Dingsheng Aluminum Indus-
                                                                                                        and minor corrections presented at
                                                China. For a complete description of the                                                                         tries (Hong Kong) Trading
                                                                                                        verification, we made certain changes to
                                                scope of this investigation, see                                                                                 Co., Ltd.8 ...........................          19.98
                                                                                                        the respondents’ subsidy rate                         Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination
                                                Appendix II.
                                                                                                        calculations since the Preliminary                       Materials Co., Ltd.9 ...........                17.14
                                                  2 See  Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                                                                        Determination. For a discussion of these              Loften Aluminum (Hong
                                                Memorandum for the Final Determination in the           changes, see the Issues and Decision                     Kong) Limited ....................              80.97
                                                Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain                                                                  Manakin Industries, LLC 10 ...                     80.97
                                                Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of                5 See Commerce Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the
                                                China,’’ dated concurrently with this determination     Questionnaire Responses of Dingsheng Aluminum           7 See Memoranda, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
                                                and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and           Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.:             Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil from the
                                                Decision Memorandum).                                   Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain          People’s Republic of China: Final Determination
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                   3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil            Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of           Calculation Memorandum for Dingsheng
                                                from the People’s Republic of China: Scope              China,’’ (Dingsheng Verification Report) and          Aluminum (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.,’’ dated
                                                Comments Decision Memorandum for the                    ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of      February 26, 2018 (Dingsheng Final Calculation
                                                Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated October 26,         Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.:       Memorandum) and ‘‘Countervailing Duty
                                                2017, and filed to ACCESS on October 30, 2017.          Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain          Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil from the
                                                   4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil            Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of           People’s Republic of China: Final Determination
                                                from the People’s Republic of China: Final Scope        China,’’ (Zhongji Verification Report), both dated    Calculation Memorandum for Zhongji Lamination
                                                Decision Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with          November 25, 2017.                                    Materials Co., Ltd,’’ dated February 26, 2018
                                                this memorandum.                                           6 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.          (Zhongji Final Calculation Memorandum).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:25 Mar 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM    05MRN1


                                                9276                                   Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices

                                                                                            Subsidy rate      suspension of liquidation will be                     IV. Scope Comments
                                                             Company                                                                                                V. Application of the Countervailing Duty
                                                                                             (percent)        refunded or canceled.
                                                                                                                                                                         Law to Imports from the PRC
                                                All-Others ..............................            18.56    International Trade Commission                        VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
                                                                                                              Notification                                          VII. Benchmarks and Discount Rates
                                                                                                                                                                    VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
                                                Disclosure                                                      In accordance with section 705(d) of                     Adverse Inferences
                                                  We intend to disclose to parties in                         the Act, we will notify the ITC of our                IX. Analysis of Programs
                                                this proceeding the calculations                              determination. In addition, we are                    X. Analysis of Comments
                                                performed for this final determination                        making available to the ITC all non-                    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in
                                                within five days of the date of public                        privileged and non-proprietary                             Its Treatment of Manakin
                                                                                                              information related to this investigation.              Comment 2: Whether the Record Supports
                                                announcement of our final                                                                                                a Finding of Policy Lending
                                                determination, in accordance with 19                          We will allow the ITC access to all
                                                                                                                                                                      Comment 3: Whether Chinese Commercial
                                                CFR 351.224(b).                                               privileged and business proprietary
                                                                                                                                                                         Banks Are Government Authorities
                                                                                                              information in our files, provided the                  Comment 4: Whether Commerce’s Policy
                                                Suspension of Liquidation                                     ITC confirms that it will not disclose                     Lending Benchmark Interest Rate
                                                   As a result of our Preliminary                             such information, either publicly or                       Computations Are Supported by the
                                                Determination, and pursuant to sections                       under an administrative protective order                   Record and Lawful
                                                                                                              (APO), without the written consent of                   Comment 5: Whether Commerce’s
                                                703(d)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act, we                                                                                      Investigation of Uninitiated Programs Is
                                                instructed U.S. Customs and Border                            the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
                                                                                                              and Compliance.                                            Lawful
                                                Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation                                                                               Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should
                                                of all entries of merchandise under                           Notification Regarding Administrative                      Change Its Export Buyer’s Credit
                                                consideration from the PRC that were                          Protective Orders                                          Determination
                                                entered or withdrawn from warehouse,                                                                                  Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should
                                                                                                                 This notice also serves as a reminder                   Use the USD Interest Rate Benchmark for
                                                for consumption, on or after August 14,
                                                                                                              to parties subject to administrative                       Hong Kong Loans
                                                2017, the date of publication of the
                                                                                                              protective orders (APOs) of their                       Comment 8: Whether Loans Issued in Hong
                                                Preliminary Determination in the                                                                                         Kong to Hong Kong Companies Are
                                                                                                              responsibility concerning the
                                                Federal Register. In accordance with                                                                                     Countervailable
                                                                                                              disposition of proprietary information
                                                section 703(d) of the Act, on December                                                                                Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
                                                                                                              disclosed under APO in accordance
                                                12, 2017, we instructed CBP to                                                                                           Revise Dingsheng’s Sales Denominator
                                                                                                              with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely                       Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should
                                                discontinue the suspension of
                                                                                                              written notification of the return or                      Correct Calculation Errors for
                                                liquidation of all entries at that time.
                                                                                                              destruction of APO materials or                            Dingsheng’s Loans
                                                   If the U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                              conversion to judicial protective order,                Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should
                                                Commission (the ITC) issues a final
                                                                                                              is hereby requested. Failure to comply                     Correct Calculation Errors for
                                                affirmative injury determination, we                                                                                     Dingsheng’s Aluminum and Coal
                                                                                                              with the regulations and the terms of an
                                                will issue a CVD order, will reinstate the                                                                               Purchases
                                                                                                              APO is a sanctionable violation.
                                                suspension of liquidation under section                                                                               Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should
                                                706(a) of the Act, and will require a cash                    Return or Destruction of Proprietary                       Place Interest Rate Benchmarks on the
                                                deposit of estimated CVDs for such                            Information                                                Record That Are Contemporaneous to
                                                entries of subject merchandise in the                                                                                    the POI
                                                                                                                 In the event the ITC issues a final                  Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should
                                                amounts indicated above. If the ITC                           negative injury determination, this                        Rely on AFA for Subsidies Discovered at
                                                determines that material injury, or                           notice serves as the only reminder to                      Zhongji’s Verification
                                                threat of material injury, does not exist,                    parties subject to an APO of their                      Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should
                                                this proceeding will be terminated and                        responsibility concerning the                              Grant Zhongji an Export Value
                                                all estimated duties deposited or                             destruction of proprietary information                     Adjustment
                                                securities posted as a result of the                          disclosed under APO in accordance                       Comment 15: Whether Commerce
                                                                                                                                                                         Improperly Rejected Dingsheng’s
                                                                                                              with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
                                                   8 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision                                                                            Benchmark Data
                                                                                                              written notification of the return or                   Comment 16: Whether Commerce Should
                                                Memorandum, Commerce has found the following
                                                companies to be cross-owned with Dingsheng HK:
                                                                                                              destruction of APO materials, or                           Revise the Benchmarks for Primary
                                                Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co.,              conversion to judicial protective order,                   Aluminum
                                                Ltd.; Hangzhou Teemful Aluminum Co., Ltd.;                    is hereby requested. Failure to comply                  Comment 17: Whether the GOC Provided
                                                Hangzhou Five Star Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou               with the regulations and terms of an                       Sufficient Evidence To Find That Input
                                                DingCheng Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Longding                                                                           Suppliers Were Not Government
                                                Aluminum Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng
                                                                                                              APO is a violation subject to sanction.
                                                                                                                                                                         Authorities
                                                Industrial Group Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Dingsheng                Notification to Interested Parties                      Comment 18: Whether CCP Affiliations or
                                                Import & Export Co., Ltd.; and Walson (HK) Trading
                                                Co., Limited.                                                   This determination is issued and                         Activities by Company Officials Make a
                                                                                                                                                                         Company a Government Authority
                                                   9 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
                                                                                                              published pursuant to sections 705(d)
                                                Memorandum, Commerce has found the following                                                                          Comment 19: Whether the Primary
                                                                                                              and 777(i) of the Act.                                     Aluminum and Steam Coal for LTAR
                                                companies to be cross-owned with Zhongji:
                                                Shantou Wanshun Package Material Stock Co., Ltd.;               Dated: February 26, 2018.                                Programs Are Specific
                                                Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.; and              Prentiss Lee Smith,                                     Comment 20: Whether Commerce Must
                                                Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Ltd.                                                                      Use a Tier-One Benchmark for the
                                                   10 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
                                                                                                                                                                         Primary Aluminum and Steam Coal for
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                Memorandum, Commerce finds that Manakin                       Negotiations.
                                                                                                                                                                         LTAR Programs
                                                Industries and Suzhou Manakin Aluminum                                                                                Comment 21: Whether Dingsheng’s Income
                                                Processing Technology Co., Ltd., effectively
                                                                                                              Appendix I
                                                                                                                                                                         Tax Deductions for R&D Expenses Are
                                                function by joint operation as a trading company.             List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
                                                Therefore, the rate for Manakin Industries also
                                                                                                                                                                         Understated
                                                                                                              Decision Memorandum                                     Comment 22: Whether Commerce Selected
                                                applies to Suzhou Manakin Aluminum Processing
                                                Technology Co., Ltd. For additional information,              I. Summary                                                 the Highest Electricity Rate Benchmarks
                                                see Preliminary Decision Memorandum and Issues                II. Background                                          Comment 23: Whether Commerce Should
                                                and Decision Memorandum.                                      III. Scope of the Investigation                            Apply AFA for Electricity



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014       19:25 Mar 02, 2018     Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00018   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM   05MRN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 43 / Monday, March 5, 2018 / Notices                                                      9277

                                                  Comment 24: Whether Commerce Should                   SUMMARY:   Pursuant to the Enforce and                which Commerce must issue its
                                                     Adjust the Electricity Benchmark for               Protect Act of 2015 (EAPA), the                       determination.
                                                     VAT                                                Department of Commerce (Commerce)                        On December 4, 2017, Commerce
                                                  Comment 25: Whether Electricity                                                                             received a covered merchandise referral
                                                                                                        received a covered merchandise referral
                                                     Constitutes General Infrastructure and
                                                                                                        from U.S. Customs and Border                          from CBP regarding CBP EAPA
                                                     Provides a Financial Contribution
                                                  Comment 26: Whether Commerce Should                   Protection (CBP) in connection with a                 Investigation No. 7212 1 which concerns
                                                     Rely on Xeneta Data for Freight                    CBP Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA)                    the AD order on HFCs from China.2
                                                     Benchmark                                          investigation concerning the                          Specifically, based on an allegation by
                                                  Comment 27: Whether Commerce Should                   antidumping duty (AD) order on                        RMS of Georgia d/b/a Choice
                                                     Find Non-Use of Steam Coal                         hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) blends from                      Refrigerants, CBP has requested that
                                                XI. Recommendation                                      the People’s Republic of China (China).               Commerce issue a determination as to
                                                Appendix II                                             In accordance with EAPA, Commerce                     whether certain merchandise imported
                                                                                                        intends to determine whether the                      by LM Supply, Inc. (LM Supply) is
                                                Scope of the Investigation                                                                                    subject to the AD order on HFCs from
                                                                                                        merchandise subject to the referral is
                                                   The merchandise covered by this                      covered by the scope of the order and                 China. Specifically, CBP asked
                                                investigation is aluminum foil having a                 promptly transmit its determination to                Commerce to clarify: (1) If the scope
                                                thickness of 0.2 mm or less, in reels
                                                                                                        CBP. Commerce is providing notice of                  exclusion for Choice® R–421A is limited
                                                exceeding 25 pounds, regardless of width.                                                                     to only merchandise that is licensed by
                                                Aluminum foil is made from an aluminum                  the referral and inviting participation
                                                                                                        from interested parties.                              the rights holder or does it apply to any
                                                alloy that contains more than 92 percent
                                                aluminum. Aluminum foil may be made to
                                                                                                                                                              HFC blends that satisfy the terms of the
                                                                                                        DATES:   Applicable March 5, 2018.                    patents, and (2) if the scope exclusion
                                                ASTM specification ASTM B479, but can
                                                also be made to other specifications.                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      is limited to only that merchandise that
                                                Regardless of specification, however, all               Manuel Rey at (202) 482–5518, AD/CVD                  also carries the trademarks indicated in
                                                aluminum foil meeting the scope description             Operations Office II, Enforcement &                   the scope exclusion.
                                                is included in the scope, including                     Compliance, International Trade
                                                aluminum foil to which lubricant has been                                                                     Notification to Interested Parties
                                                                                                        Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                applied to one or both sides of the foil.               Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue                       Commerce is hereby notifying
                                                   Excluded from the scope of this                                                                            interested parties that it has received the
                                                investigation is aluminum foil that is backed
                                                                                                        NW, Washington, DC 20230.
                                                                                                                                                              covered merchandise referral referenced
                                                with paper, paperboard, plastics, or similar            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            above, will begin a new segment of the
                                                backing materials on one side or both sides                                                                   proceeding, and intends to issue a
                                                of the aluminum foil, as well as etched                 Background
                                                capacitor foil and aluminum foil that is cut
                                                                                                                                                              determination regarding whether the
                                                                                                           On February 24, 2016, the Trade                    merchandise subject to the referral is
                                                to shape.
                                                   Where the nominal and actual
                                                                                                        Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act                covered merchandise within the
                                                measurements vary, a product is within the              of 2015 was signed into law, which                    meaning of section 517(a)(3) of the Act.
                                                scope if application of either the nominal or           contains Title IV-Prevention of Evasion               Additionally, Commerce intends to
                                                actual measurement would place it within                of Antidumping and Countervailing                     provide interested parties with the
                                                the scope based on the definitions set forth            Duty Orders (short title ‘‘Enforce and                opportunity to participate in this
                                                above. The products under investigation are             Protect Act of 2015’’ or ‘‘EAPA’’) (Pub.              segment of the proceeding, including
                                                currently classifiable under Harmonized                 L. 114–125, 130 Stat. 122, 155, Feb. 24,              through the submission of comments,
                                                Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)            2016). Effective August 22, 2016, section             and, if appropriate, new factual
                                                subheadings 7607.11.3000, 7607.11.6000,                 421 of the EAPA added section 517 to
                                                7607.11.9030, 7607.11.9060, 7607.11.9090,
                                                                                                                                                              information and verification.
                                                and 7607.19.6000. Further, merchandise that
                                                                                                        the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the               Specifically, Commerce will notify
                                                falls within the scope of this proceeding may           Act), which establishes a formal process              parties on the segment-specific service
                                                also be entered into the United States under            for CBP to investigate allegations of the             list for this segment of the proceeding of
                                                HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3060,                         evasion of antidumping and                            a schedule for comments. In addition,
                                                7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3045, 7606.12.3055,               countervailing duty (AD/CVD) orders.                  Commerce may request factual
                                                7606.12.3090, 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3090,               Section 517(b)(4)(A) of the Act provides              information from any person to assist in
                                                7606.91.6080, 7606.92.3090, and                         a procedure whereby if, during the                    making its determination and may
                                                7606.92.6080.                                           course of an EAPA investigation, CBP is               verify submissions of factual
                                                   Although the HTSUS subheadings are                   unable to determine whether the                       information, if Commerce determines
                                                provided for convenience and customs
                                                purposes, the written description of the
                                                                                                        merchandise at issue is covered                       that such verification is appropriate.
                                                scope of this proceeding is dispositive.                merchandise within the meaning of                     Commerce intends to issue a final
                                                                                                        section 517(a)(3) of the Act, it shall refer          determination within 120 days of the
                                                [FR Doc. 2018–04402 Filed 3–2–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        the matter to Commerce to make such a                 publication of this notice (this deadline
                                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                        determination. Section 517(a)(3) of the
                                                                                                        Act defines covered merchandise as                       1 See Letter from CBP, ‘‘EAPA Case Number:

                                                                                                        merchandise that is subject to an                     7212; Scope Referral Request for merchandise
                                                DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                                                                        under EAPA Investigation 7212, imported by LM
                                                                                                        antidumping duty order issued under                   Supply, Inc. and concerning the investigation of
                                                International Trade Administration                      section 736 of the Act or a                           evasion of the antidumping duty order on
                                                                                                        countervailing duty order issued under                hydrofluorocarbon blends from the People’s
                                                [A–570–028]                                             section 706 of the Act. Section                       Republic of China (A–570–028),’’ dated December
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                              4, 2017. This document and any supporting
                                                                                                        517(b)(4)(B) of the Act states that                   documents will be available electronically on
                                                Hydrofluorocarbon Blends From the
                                                                                                        Commerce, after receiving a covered                   Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping Duty
                                                People’s Republic of China: Notice of
                                                                                                        merchandise referral from CBP, shall                  and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
                                                Covered Merchandise Referral                                                                                  Service System (ACCESS) within five days of
                                                                                                        determine whether the merchandise is
                                                                                                                                                              publication of this notice.
                                                AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                    covered merchandise and promptly                         2 See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People’s
                                                International Trade Administration,                     transmit its determination to CBP. The                Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 81 FR
                                                Department of Commerce.                                 Act does not establish a deadline within              55436 (August 19, 2016).



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:25 Mar 02, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM   05MRN1



Document Created: 2018-03-03 02:45:55
Document Modified: 2018-03-03 02:45:55
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable March 5, 2018.
ContactYasmin Bordas, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3813.
FR Citation83 FR 9274 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR