83_FR_9592 83 FR 9548 - Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Analysis of Employer Performance Measurement Approaches

83 FR 9548 - Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Analysis of Employer Performance Measurement Approaches

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 44 (March 6, 2018)

Page Range9548-9549
FR Document2018-04546

The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that required data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data about the Analysis of Employer Performance Measurement Approaches. A copy of the proposed information Collection Request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the Addresses section of this notice.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018) 
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9548-9549]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Analysis of Employer Performance Measurement 
Approaches

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation 
Office, Department of Labor.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing 
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that 
required data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden 
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are 
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on 
respondents can be properly assessed.
    Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the collection of 
data about the Analysis of Employer Performance Measurement Approaches. 
A copy of the proposed information Collection Request (ICR) can be 
obtained by contacting the office listed below in the Addresses section 
of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
addressee section below on or before May 7, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following 
methods: Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.fgov; Mail or Courier: Megan 
Lizik, Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-
2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Instructions: 
Please submit one copy of your comments by only one method. All 
submissions received must include the agency name and OMB Control 
Number identified for this information collection. Comments, including 
any personal information provided, become a matter of public record. 
They will also be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB 
approval of the information collection request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Megan Lizik by email at 
ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO), in collaboration with the 
Employment and Training Administration (ETA), is conducting a 36-month 
analysis of employer services measurement approaches and metrics, as 
well as their cross-state and cross-program applicability, with a goal 
of understanding and implementing a final indicator of performance. 
Under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the 
Secretaries of Labor and Education are required to establish one or 
more primary indicators of performance that indicate the effectiveness 
of core programs in serving employers. Through town halls, workgroups, 
and questions posed through the notice of proposed rule-making, the 
Secretaries of Labor and Education established three measures to be 
piloted by States: (1) An employee retention measure, (2) an employer 
penetration rate, and (3) a repeat business measure. States were also 
encouraged to pilot additional measures to assess effectiveness in 
serving employers. No clear metric has emerged to date as a single 
point of measurement of success in providing services to employers.
    The study will explore and establish an understanding of the state 
of the field in the area of employer services measurement and 
supplement the start-up of reporting by the States on the National 
Pilot measures. Key objectives of the study include: (1) Developing and 
understanding how employer services are defined by the federal 
government, States, localities, and core WIOA programs and exploring 
options for developing a uniform definition of employer services; (2) 
identifying what measures exist for understanding employer services, 
key objectives of these measures, and possibilities for uniform 
implementation at the federal level; and (3) developing options for an 
evaluation design to assess the validity, reliability, and feasibility 
of proposed measures and alternative measures of effectiveness in 
serving employers.
    This notification requests clearance for: (1) A 45-minute online 
survey of state WIOA administrators in the fifty States, the District 
of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands; (2) a 20-minute 
online survey of a sample of employers identified in partnership with 
the National Association of State Workforce Agencies (NASWA); (3) site 
visits that include structured interviews and focus groups to 
approximately 8 States; and (4) interviews with approximately 8 
employers.
    The survey of state WIOA administrators will collect information on 
which measures are being used by States, including National Pilot 
measures and alternate measures, progress made in implementing those 
measures, and how those measures are being used beyond required federal 
reporting.
    The survey of a sample of employers will document businesses' 
understanding of employer services from the workforce system and what 
it means for those services to be effective. The sample of employers 
will be drawn from DirectEmployers members, NASWA Business of the Year 
Award Winners, and others recommended by NASWA.

[[Page 9549]]

    The site visits to a selection of approximately eight States are 
intended to allow a deeper understanding of why particular measures 
were selected, progress in implementing performance measures, and 
related challenges. This fieldwork will include semi-structured 
interviews and focus groups. The States will be selected based on the 
results of the survey and other study knowledge, to include a mix of 
locations in terms of geographic region, performance measures being 
used, and status of implementation. Semi-structured interviews with a 
selection of approximately eight employers are intended to more fully 
explore issues of interest that emerge from the employer survey 
responses. Employer interview respondents will be selected based on 
survey responses as well as suggestions from NASWA regarding employers 
with particularly strong experience engaging with the workforce system.

II. Desired Focus of Comments

    Currently, DOL is soliciting comments concerning the above data 
collection for the analysis of employer performance measurement 
approaches. DOL is particularly interested in comments that do the 
following:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency 
related to employer services, including whether the information will 
have practical utility;
     evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the ICR to survey and fieldwork respondents, including the 
validity of the study approach and assumptions used;
     enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     minimize the burden of the information collection on 
respondents, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, 
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic submission of 
responses).

                                         Table 1--Estimated Time Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden
 Information collection activity   Total number    Annual number   responses per   per response    Annual burden
                                  of respondents  of respondents    respondent        (hours)          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey--State WIOA Administrator          \a\ 43              14               1            0.75              11
Survey--Employer................         \b\ 474             158               1            0.33              53
Site Visit Protocol--State                    32              11               1            0.75               8
 Administrator..................
Site Visit Protocol--Local                     8               3               1            0.75               2
 Administrator..................
Site Visit Protocol--State and                32              11               1            0.75               8
 Local Workforce Development
 Board Staff and Members........
Site Visit Protocol--State and                16               5               1            0.75               4
 Local Staff Collecting
 Performance Data...............
Site Visit Protocol--American             \c\ 40              13               1               1              13
 Job Center Staff...............
Interview--Employer.............               8               3               1            0.75               2
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................             653             218  ..............  ..............             101
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Based on an 80 percent response rate.
\b\ Based on a 50 percent response rate.
\c\ One focus group of five per site visit.

III. Current Actions

    At this time, the Department of Labor is requesting clearance for 
data collection via online surveys and fieldwork for the analysis of 
employer performance measurement approaches.
    Type of review: New ICR
    OMB Control Number: 1290-0NEW
    Affected Public: Individuals working on state and local workforce 
development programs, Workforce Development Boards, and American Job 
Centers selected for surveys and fieldwork; HR department 
representatives of businesses selected for surveys and interviews.
    Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) approval; they will also become a matter of public record.

    Dated: February 27, 2018.
Molly Irwin,
Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2018-04546 Filed 3-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-HX-P

9548 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Notices ESTIMATED BURDEN HOURS—Continued Average Total Annual Number of Annual burden Type of instrument number of number of responses per estimated hour per respondents respondents respondent burden hours response Quarterly Narrative Progress Reports ................................. 24 8 4 10 320 Quarterly Performance Reports ........................................... 24 8 4 4 128 Total .............................................................................. 9,948 3,316 ........................ ........................ 9,226 Comments submitted in response to addressee section below on or before of success in providing services to this request will be summarized and/or May 7, 2018. employers. included in the request for Office of ADDRESSES: You may submit comments The study will explore and establish Management and Budget approval of the by either one of the following methods: an understanding of the state of the field information collection request; they will Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.fgov; in the area of employer services also become a matter of public record. Mail or Courier: Megan Lizik, Chief measurement and supplement the start- Dated: February 27, 2018. Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. up of reporting by the States on the Molly Irwin, Department of Labor, Room S–2312, 200 National Pilot measures. Key objectives Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, of the study include: (1) Developing and Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of Labor. DC 20210. Instructions: Please submit understanding how employer services one copy of your comments by only one are defined by the federal government, [FR Doc. 2018–04545 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am] method. All submissions received must States, localities, and core WIOA BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P include the agency name and OMB programs and exploring options for Control Number identified for this developing a uniform definition of DEPARTMENT OF LABOR information collection. Comments, employer services; (2) identifying what including any personal information measures exist for understanding Agency Information Collection provided, become a matter of public employer services, key objectives of Activities; Submission for OMB record. They will also be summarized these measures, and possibilities for Review; Comment Request; Analysis and/or included in the request for OMB uniform implementation at the federal of Employer Performance approval of the information collection level; and (3) developing options for an Measurement Approaches request. evaluation design to assess the validity, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: reliability, and feasibility of proposed AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Contact Megan Lizik by email at measures and alternative measures of Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov. effectiveness in serving employers. Office, Department of Labor. This notification requests clearance SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ACTION: Notice of Information for: (1) A 45-minute online survey of Collection; request for comment. I. Background state WIOA administrators in the fifty The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO), in States, the District of Columbia, Puerto SUMMARY: The Department of Labor collaboration with the Employment and Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands; (2) (DOL), as part of its continuing effort to Training Administration (ETA), is a 20-minute online survey of a sample reduce paperwork and respondent conducting a 36-month analysis of of employers identified in partnership burden, conducts a preclearance employer services measurement with the National Association of State consultation program to provide the approaches and metrics, as well as their Workforce Agencies (NASWA); (3) site general public and Federal agencies cross-state and cross-program visits that include structured interviews with an opportunity to comment on applicability, with a goal of and focus groups to approximately 8 proposed and/or continuing collections understanding and implementing a final States; and (4) interviews with of information in accordance with the indicator of performance. Under the approximately 8 employers. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity The survey of state WIOA (PRA95). This program helps to ensure Act (WIOA), the Secretaries of Labor administrators will collect information that required data can be provided in and Education are required to establish on which measures are being used by the desired format, reporting burden one or more primary indicators of States, including National Pilot (time and financial resources) is performance that indicate the measures and alternate measures, minimized, collection instruments are effectiveness of core programs in serving progress made in implementing those clearly understood, and the impact of employers. Through town halls, measures, and how those measures are collection requirements on respondents workgroups, and questions posed being used beyond required federal can be properly assessed. through the notice of proposed rule- reporting. Currently, DOL is soliciting comments making, the Secretaries of Labor and The survey of a sample of employers concerning the collection of data about Education established three measures to will document businesses’ the Analysis of Employer Performance be piloted by States: (1) An employee understanding of employer services sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Measurement Approaches. A copy of retention measure, (2) an employer from the workforce system and what it the proposed information Collection penetration rate, and (3) a repeat means for those services to be effective. Request (ICR) can be obtained by business measure. States were also The sample of employers will be drawn contacting the office listed below in the encouraged to pilot additional measures from DirectEmployers members, ADDRESSES section of this notice. to assess effectiveness in serving NASWA Business of the Year Award DATES: Written comments must be employers. No clear metric has emerged Winners, and others recommended by submitted to the office listed in the to date as a single point of measurement NASWA. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:39 Mar 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM 06MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 6, 2018 / Notices 9549 The site visits to a selection of respondents will be selected based on the information will have practical approximately eight States are intended survey responses as well as suggestions utility; to allow a deeper understanding of why from NASWA regarding employers with • evaluate the accuracy of the particular measures were selected, particularly strong experience engaging agency’s estimate of the burden of the progress in implementing performance with the workforce system. ICR to survey and fieldwork measures, and related challenges. This respondents, including the validity of fieldwork will include semi-structured II. Desired Focus of Comments the study approach and assumptions interviews and focus groups. The States Currently, DOL is soliciting comments used; will be selected based on the results of • enhance the quality, utility, and concerning the above data collection for the survey and other study knowledge, clarity of the information to be the analysis of employer performance to include a mix of locations in terms collected; and measurement approaches. DOL is of geographic region, performance • minimize the burden of the particularly interested in comments that measures being used, and status of information collection on respondents, implementation. Semi-structured do the following: including the use of appropriate interviews with a selection of • Evaluate whether the proposed automated, electronic, mechanical, or approximately eight employers are collection of information is necessary other technological collection intended to more fully explore issues of for the proper performance of the techniques or other forms of information interest that emerge from the employer functions of the agency related to technology (e.g., permitting electronic survey responses. Employer interview employer services, including whether submission of responses). TABLE 1—ESTIMATED TIME BURDEN Average Total Annual Number of burden per Annual Information collection activity number of number of responses per response burden hours respondents respondents respondent (hours) Survey—State WIOA Administrator ..................................... a 43 14 1 0.75 11 Survey—Employer ............................................................... b 474 158 1 0.33 53 Site Visit Protocol—State Administrator .............................. 32 11 1 0.75 8 Site Visit Protocol—Local Administrator .............................. 8 3 1 0.75 2 Site Visit Protocol—State and Local Workforce Develop- ment Board Staff and Members ....................................... 32 11 1 0.75 8 Site Visit Protocol—State and Local Staff Collecting Per- formance Data .................................................................. 16 5 1 0.75 4 Site Visit Protocol—American Job Center Staff .................. c 40 13 1 1 13 Interview—Employer ............................................................ 8 3 1 0.75 2 Total .............................................................................. 653 218 ........................ ........................ 101 a Based on an 80 percent response rate. b Based on a 50 percent response rate. c One focus group of five per site visit. III. Current Actions Dated: February 27, 2018. Procurement Policy (OFPP) within the Molly Irwin, Office of Management and Budget At this time, the Department of Labor Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of (OMB) is proposing to amend OMB is requesting clearance for data Labor. Circular A–131, Value Engineering, to collection via online surveys and [FR Doc. 2018–04546 Filed 3–5–18; 8:45 am] reduce the reporting burden on Federal fieldwork for the analysis of employer BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P agencies. Value Engineering is an performance measurement approaches. effective technique for cutting waste and Type of review: New ICR inefficiency—helping Federal agencies reduce acquisition costs, improve OMB Control Number: 1290–0NEW OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND performance, enhance quality, and Affected Public: Individuals working BUDGET foster innovation. The proposal would on state and local workforce eliminate the requirement for agencies Office of Federal Procurement Policy development programs, Workforce to report annually to OMB and instead Development Boards, and American Job Value Engineering (VE) encourage agencies to share best Centers selected for surveys and practices, case studies and other fieldwork; HR department AGENCY: Office of Federal Procurement information on the Acquisition Gateway representatives of businesses selected Policy (OFPP), Office of Management (https://hallways.cap.gsa.gov/login- for surveys and interviews. and Budget (OMB). information) that can facilitate better ACTION: Proposed revision to Office of understanding and use of this Comments submitted in response to sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Management and Budget Circular No. management tool within the Executive this request will be summarized and/or A–131, ‘‘Value Engineering’’. Branch. included in the request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) SUMMARY: In accordance with OMB DATES:Interested parties should submit approval; they will also become a matter Memorandum M–17–26 ‘‘Reducing comments within 30 days of this notice. of public record. Burden for Federal Agencies by ADDRESSES: Comments may be Rescinding and Modifying OMB submitted through http:// Memoranda,’’ the Office of Federal www.regulations.gov. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:39 Mar 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MRN1.SGM 06MRN1


Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:48:37
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:48:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of Information Collection; request for comment.
DatesWritten comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
ContactContact Megan Lizik by email at [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 9548 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR