Document

Notice of Availability of the Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus minimus), Colorado and Utah

In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Manag...

Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management
  1. [BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500174493]

AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION:

Notice of availability.

SUMMARY:

In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) amendment and draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse ( Centrocercus minimus) and by this notice is providing information announcing the opening of the comment period on the draft RMP amendment/EIS and is announcing the comment period on the BLM's proposed areas of critical environmental concern (ACECs).

DATES:

This notice announces the opening of a 90-day comment period for the draft RMP amendment/EIS beginning with the date following the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) publication of its Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register . The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on Fridays.

To afford the BLM the opportunity to consider comments in the proposed RMP amendment/final EIS, please ensure your comments are received prior to the close of the 90-day comment period or 15 days after the last public meeting, whichever is later.

In addition, this notice also announces the opening of a 60-day comment period for ACECs. The BLM must receive your ACEC-related comments by January 8, 2024.

ADDRESSES:

The draft RMP amendment/EIS is available for review on the BLM ePlanning project website at https://eplanning.blm.gov/​eplanning-ui/​project/​2019031/​510.

Written comments related to the Gunnison Sage-Grouse RMP amendment may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Documents pertinent to this proposal may be examined online at https://eplanning.blm.gov/​eplanning-ui/​project/​2019031/​510 and at the Grand Junction, Uncompahgre, Tres Rios, Gunnison, San Luis Valley, Moab, and Monticello Field Offices.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gina Phillips, Project Manager, telephone 970-240-5381; BLM Southwest District Office, 2465 South Townsend Ave., Montrose, CO 81401; email . Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services for contacting Ms. Phillips. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This document provides notice that the BLM Colorado and Utah State Directors have prepared a draft RMP amendment/EIS, provides information announcing the opening of the comment period on the draft RMP amendment/EIS, and is announcing the comment period on the BLM's proposed ACECs. The RMP amendment is being considered to allow the BLM to evaluate protections for Gunnison sage-grouse consistent with the latest measures in the recently completed U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recovery plan, which would require amending the following existing plans:

Colorado

Utah

The planning area is located in portions of 19 Colorado counties: Alamosa, Archuleta, Conejos, Costilla, ( printed page 77354) Delta, Dolores, Garfield, Gunnison, Hinsdale, La Plata, Mesa, Mineral, Montezuma, Montrose, Ouray, Rio Grande, Saguache, San Juan, and San Miguel; and two Utah counties: Grand and San Juan; and encompasses approximately 16 million acres of public land.

Levels of protection for Gunnison sage-grouse habitat are highly variable across the BLM administrative units. Several of the existing RMPs, especially the recently completed (as recent as 2020) land use planning revisions, provide management direction that meet the existing purpose and need of this RMP amendment, while others that were completed in the early 1990s, for example, do not provide adequate protection for Gunnison sage-grouse consistent with the latest measures in the recently completed USFWS recovery plan. The planning area includes lands administered by the BLM; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), National Park Service; U.S. DOI, Bureau of Reclamation; State of Colorado; State of Utah; and private lands.

The BLM published a notice of intent in the Federal Register to initiate the public scoping period for this planning effort on July 6, 2022 (87 FR 40262). The BLM hosted four public scoping meetings aimed at soliciting nominations for ACECs, identifying the scope of issues to be addressed in the RMP amendment, and gathering input to assist in formulating a reasonable range of alternatives. The resource concerns identified during the scoping process included Gunnison sage-grouse habitat, vegetation, livestock grazing management, mineral development, renewable energy development, wildland fire ecology and management, ACECs, recreation, lands and realty, air resources, soil resources, lands with wilderness characteristics, and social and economic conditions.

Purpose and Need

The BLM's purpose consists of the following:

This BLM action is necessary to accomplish the following:

Alternatives Including the Preferred Alternative

The BLM has analyzed five alternatives in detail, including the no action alternative. This land use planning effort addresses management actions impacting, or with the potential to impact, Gunnison sage-grouse and occupied and unoccupied habitat in the decision area. The decision area consists of approximately 2,156,150 acres of BLM-managed surface lands (1,926,100 acres in Colorado and 230,050 acres in Utah) and 2,852,390 acres of Federal subsurface mineral estate (2,563,220 acres in Colorado and 289,170 acres in Utah). Alternative A (No Action Alternative—Current Management) would continue current BLM management direction in the 11 administrative units in the planning area.

Alternative B would prioritize removing identified threats within occupied and unoccupied habitat and reduce impacts within the decision area, which includes the four-mile buffer around habitat, and potential linkage-connectivity areas, to the maximum extent allowable. Alternative B contains two sub-alternatives for livestock grazing management actions in response to recommendations made in public scoping comments. Alternative B would designate all nominated ACECs that meet relevance and importance criteria.

Alternative C would minimize, mitigate, or compensate for impacts from resource uses and activities in occupied and unoccupied habitat. No new ACECs would be designated under Alternative C.

Alternative D would allocate resource uses and conserve resource values while sustaining and enhancing ecological integrity across the decision area, and designate a specific subset of nominated ACECs. Conservation measures focus on occupied and unoccupied habitat that includes a 1-mile buffer around habitat and could extend to linkage-connectivity areas.

Alternative E considers adopting applicable management direction from the interagency Candidate Conservation Agreement for the Gunnison sage-grouse, Gunnison Basin Population. The BLM considered three additional alternatives but dismissed them from detailed analysis as explained in the draft RMP amendment/EIS.

The State Directors have identified Alternative D as the preferred alternative. Alternative D was found to best meet the State Directors' planning guidance and was, therefore, selected as the preferred alternative because it: addresses conservation actions within occupied and unoccupied habitat areas and in linkage-connectivity areas; provides for allocating resource uses and conserving resources; and designates a specific subset of ACECs.

Mitigation

The BLM analyzed compensatory mitigation under Alternatives B, C, and D. Under Alternative B the BLM would avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to Gunnison sage-grouse and their habitat in occupied and unoccupied habitat management areas and incorporate a minimum of a 5 to 1 ratio where 1 acre of disturbance results in 5 acres of mitigation.

ACECs

Consistent with land use planning regulations at 43 CFR 1610.7-2(b), the BLM is announcing the opening of a 60-day comment period on the ACECs proposed for designation in the preferred alternative. Comments may be submitted using any of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section earlier.

The proposed ACECs included in the preferred alternative, all located in Colorado, are:

Existing ACECs in Colorado and Utah would continue to be designated under all alternatives and current management would remain except where updated. Following are the existing, currently designated ACECs, all in Colorado, that would receive updated management. Updates in management are specified below to protect the relevant and important values:

The preferred alternative would not propose the following potential ACECs for designation: All BLM-administered surface lands within Gunnison sage-grouse Occupied Habitat Management Area and Unoccupied Habitat Management Area ACEC (Colorado and Utah); Gunnison Satellite Populations Habitat ACEC (Colorado and Utah); Northdale ACEC (Colorado); Kezar Basin ACEC (Colorado); North Parlin ACEC (Colorado); South Parlin ACEC (Colorado); Ohio Creek ACEC (Colorado); and Waunita ACEC (Colorado).

Schedule for the Decision-Making Process

The BLM will provide additional opportunities for public participation consistent with the NEPA and land use planning processes, including a 30-day public protest period and a 60-day Governor's consistency review on the proposed RMP. The proposed RMP amendment/final EIS is anticipated to be available for public protest in the summer of 2024 with an approved RMP amendment and record of decision in the fall of 2024.

The BLM will hold three public meetings in the following locations: one meeting virtually hosted and two in-person meetings at Gunnison, CO, and Dove Creek, CO. The specific date(s) and location(s) of these meetings will be announced at least 15 days in advance through the ePlanning page (see ADDRESSES ) and applicable local newspapers.

The BLM will continue to consult with Indian Tribal Nations on a government-to-government basis in accordance with Executive Order 13175, BLM MS 1780, and other Departmental policies. Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential impacts to cultural resources, will be given due consideration.

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2)

Douglas J. Vilsack,

State Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-24394 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4331-16-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

88 FR 77353

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Notice of Availability of the Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for the Gunnison Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus minimus), Colorado and Utah,” thefederalregister.org (November 9, 2023), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2023-24394/notice-of-availability-of-the-draft-resource-management-plan-amendment-and-environmental-impact-statement-for-the-gunnis.