Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and POSCO, producers/exporters of certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolle...
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and POSCO, producers/exporters of certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023.
DATES:
Applicable September 1, 2026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Doyle or Seth Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5882 or (202) 482-0029, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 5, 2026, Commerce published the
Preliminary Results
of this administrative review in the
Federal Register
and invited interested parties to comment.[1]
On June 16 and
( printed page 56131)
July 23, 2026, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this review to no later than August 25, 2026.[2]
For a complete description of the events that occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[3]
The merchandise covered by this
Order
is cold-rolled steel from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of the
Order, see
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via ACCESS, which is available to registered users at
access.trade.gov.
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at
access.trade.gov/​frnotices.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy,
i.e.,
a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.[5]
For a full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions,
see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from interested parties, we made certain changes to POSCO's countervailable subsidy rate calculation from the
Preliminary Results.
For a discussion of these changes,
see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
We determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates exist for the period January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023.
Producer/exporter
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Hyundai Steel Company 6
1.28
POSCO 7
3.64
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose its calculations performed in connection with the final results of review to interested parties within five days of public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice of final results in the
Federal Register
, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For Hyundai Steel and POSCO, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties at the subsidy rates listed in the table above. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the
Federal Register
. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (
i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies listed above on shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review.
For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific rate applicable to the company or the all-others rate, as appropriate. These cash deposits, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: August 25, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the
Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Electricity Is Subsidized by the Government of Korea
Comment 2: Whether the Provision of Korea Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) Permits is Countervailable
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Attributed Benefits POSCO International Corporation (POSCO International) Received for the Electricity for More than Adequate Remuneration (MTAR) Program to the Production of Subject Merchandise
( printed page 56132)
Comment 4: Whether the Benchmark Selected for the Electricity for MTAR Program is Appropriate
Comment 5: Whether POSCO International's Korea Export-Import Bank (KEXIM) Overseas Investment Credit Program (OICP) Loan is Tied to the Production of Non-Subject Merchandise
Comment 6: Whether to Modify POSCO's KEXIM OICP Loan Benefit
Comment 7: Whether the Constructing and Operating a Workplace Nursery Program is Countervailable
Comment 8: Whether to Modify the Benchmark Interest Rate for Hyundai Steel's KEXIM Export Growth Loan
VII. Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and
Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023,
91 FR 10795 (March 5, 2026) (
Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2.
See
Memoranda, “Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,” dated June 16, 2026; and “Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 2023 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,” dated July 23, 2026.
3.
See
Memorandum, “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2023,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
4.
See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, India, and the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (the Republic of Korea) and Countervailing Duty Orders (Brazil and India),81 FR 64436 (September 20, 2016) (
Order).
5.
See
sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
6.
As discussed in the
Preliminary Results
PDM, Commerce has found Hyundai Green Power Co. Ltd to be cross-owned with Hyundai Steel.
7.
As discussed in the
Preliminary Results
PDM, Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with POSCO: POSCO Future M; POSCO Holdings; POSCO M-Tech, POSCO Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture Co., Ltd., and POSCO Mobility Solutions. We note that POSCO also exported certain subject merchandise through an affiliated trading company, POSCO International Corporation (POSCO International). We examined POSCO International in the context of POSCO, and POSCO International's subsidies are included in POSCO's total subsidy rate.
Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.
91 FR 56130
Web Citation
Suggested Web Citation
Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.
“Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023,” thefederalregister.org (September 1, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-17768/certain-cold-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-countervailing-duty-administrative-r.