Document

Medical Devices; Radiology Devices; Classification of the Radiology Software for Referral of Findings Related to Fibrotic Lung Disease

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease into class II (special controls). The spec...

Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
  1. 21 CFR Part 892
  2. [Docket No. FDA-2026-N-12254]

AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:

Final amendment; final order.

SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for classification of the radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II will provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

DATES:

This order is effective October 30, 2026. The classification was applicable on January 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jessica Lamb, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3672, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6167, .

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

Upon request, FDA (the Agency or we) has classified the radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease into class II (special controls), which we have determined ( printed page 68468) will provide a reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. In addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class III assignment.

The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified into, and remains within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as “postamendments devices” because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).

FDA may also classify a device through “De Novo” classification, a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)). Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo classification process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.

Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket notification (510(k)) for a device that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).

Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) and then a request for classification, if the person determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.

Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The classification will be according to the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial classification of the device.

We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the FD&C Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, defining “substantial equivalence”). Instead, sponsors can use the less burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

On June 29, 2022, FDA received Imvaria, Inc.'s request for De Novo classification of the Fibresolve device. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.

We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device, but there is sufficient information to establish special controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use (see section 513(a)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act). After review of the information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.

Therefore, on January 12, 2024, FDA issued an order to the requester classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 892.2085.[1] We have named the generic type of device “radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease,” and it is identified as a prescription image processing device that analyzes computed tomography images to suggest the presence of disease or of an imaging finding suggestive of disease. The output of this device is intended to be used as adjunctive information as part of a referral pathway in the overall diagnostic assessment process.

FDA has identified the risks to health associated with this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1.

Table 1—Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures for Radiology Software for Referral of Findings Related to Fibrotic Lung Disease

Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
False positive findings leading to harmful incorrect and/or delayed management of a patient with an alternative underlying fibrotic lung disease Clinical performance testing; Postmarket surveillance; and Labeling.
False negative findings leading to harmful incorrect and/or delayed management of a patient with a fibrotic lung disease Clinical performance testing; Postmarket surveillance; and Labeling.
( printed page 68469)
Incorrect and/or delayed patient management due to the device being misused to analyze images from an unintended patient population or from images acquired with incompatible imaging hardware or image acquisition parameters Clinical performance testing; Postmarket surveillance; and Labeling.
Incorrect and/or delayed patient management due to misinterpretation of device output or overreliance on device output for radiological image interpretation Labeling.
Device failure leading to the absence of results, delay of results, or incorrect results, leading to inaccurate or delayed patient assessment Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.

FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. For a device to fall within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified by this final order.

At the time of classification, radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease are for prescription use only. Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met.

Under the FD&C Act, submission of a premarket notification under section 510(k) is required to reasonably assure the safety and effectiveness of class II devices unless FDA determines that the device type should be exempt under section 510(m) of the FD&C Act. At this time FDA has not made this determination for radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease. This device is therefore subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

We have determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type that does not normally have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

This final order establishes special controls that refer to previously approved collections of information found in other FDA regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections of information in part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo classification have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding premarket approval have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820 regarding quality management system regulation have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801 regarding labeling have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 892

  • Medical devices
  • Radiation protection
  • X-rays

Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 892 is amended as follows:

PART 892—RADIOLOGY DEVICES

1. The authority citation for part 892 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.

2. Add § 892.2085 to subpart B to read as follows:

Radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease.

(a) Identification. Radiology software for referral of findings related to fibrotic lung disease is a prescription image processing device that analyzes computed tomography images to suggest the presence of disease or of an imaging finding suggestive of disease. The output of this device is intended to be used as adjunctive information as part of a referral pathway in the overall diagnostic assessment process.

(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:

(1) Data obtained from premarket clinical performance validation testing and postmarket surveillance acquired under anticipated conditions of use must demonstrate that the device performs as intended when used to analyze data from the intended patient population, unless FDA determines based on the totality of the information provided for premarket review that data from postmarket surveillance is not required. The following must be met:

(i) Validation report(s) must include a detailed description of the data, criteria, and methods used to define the reference standard that were used to evaluate device performance. The reference standard used in the clinical validation must be justified for the condition named in the device's indications for use.

(ii) The performance of the device must be compared to an appropriate clinical control, ( e.g., the performance or agreement of clinicians performing the same task).

(iii) The performance assessment must be based on pre-specified diagnostic accuracy measures ( e.g., receiver operator characteristic plot, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios).

(iv) Test datasets must contain a sufficient number of cases from important cohorts ( i.e., subsets defined by clinically relevant demographics, confounders, effect modifiers, concomitant diseases, challenging cases such as early disease, and subsets defined by image acquisition characteristics) such that the performance estimates and confidence intervals of the device for these individual subsets can be characterized ( printed page 68470) for the intended-use population and imaging equipment.

(2) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. Software documentation must include a detailed technical description of all image analysis algorithms, including the model inputs and outputs, each major component or block, and any model limitations.

(3) Labeling must include:

(i) A detailed description of the clinical environment and context of use, including information on interpretation of outputs within the intended workflow;

(ii) A detailed description of compatible imaging hardware and imaging protocols;

(iii) A detailed summary of the performance testing for each device output, including test methods, dataset characteristics, testing environment, results (with confidence intervals), and a summary of sub-analyses on case distributions stratified by relevant confounders;

(iv) According to the timeframe specified in any postmarket surveillance protocol approved by FDA to satisfy the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a detailed summary of the postmarket surveillance data must be provided, including updates to the labeling to accurately reflect device performance based upon data collected during the postmarket surveillance experience; and

(v) Limiting statements that indicate:

(A) A description of situations in which the device may fail or may not operate at its expected performance level ( e.g., the impact of poor image quality on device performance or degraded performance in certain subpopulations), as applicable, including any limitations in the dataset used to train, tune, and test the algorithm during device development;

(B) A discussion of what the device detects in the context of diagnosing fibrotic lung disease; and

(C) A warning that users should use the device in conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic findings, including information obtained by alternative methods and clinical evaluation, as appropriate.

Grace R. Graham,

Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs.

Footnotes

1.  FDA notes that the “ACTION” caption for this final order is styled as “Final amendment; final order,” rather than “Final order.” Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made to indicate that the document “amends” the Code of Federal Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2026-22180 Filed 10-29-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

91 FR 68467

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Medical Devices; Radiology Devices; Classification of the Radiology Software for Referral of Findings Related to Fibrotic Lung Disease,” thefederalregister.org (October 30, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-22180/medical-devices-radiology-devices-classification-of-the-radiology-software-for-referral-of-findings-related-to-fibrotic-.