80 FR 32937 - Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 111 (June 10, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 111 (June 10, 2015)
| Page Range | 32937-32939 | |
| FR Document | 2015-14214 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 32937-32939] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-14214] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 5, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013.\1\ The review covers two producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel) and Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO), both of which were selected for individual examination. As a result of our analysis of the comments received, these final results differ from our Preliminary Results. For these final results, we continue to find that Husteel and HYSCO sold subject merchandise at prices less than normal value. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 72168 (December 5, 2014) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective date: June 10, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Shuler or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; [[Page 32938]] telephone (202) 482-1293 or (202) 482-2778, respectively. Background Following the Preliminary Results, the Department sent a supplemental questionnaire to HYSCO and received timely responses from HYSCO and its affiliate, Hyundai Steel.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Letter to HYSCO, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welding Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Supplemental Questionnaire,'' (December 16, 2014); see also Letter to the Department, ``Twenty-First Administrative Review of Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Supplemental Section D Questionnaire Response,'' (January 7, 2015) and see Letter to the Department regarding, ``Twenty-First Administrative Review of Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Response of Hyundai Steel to Question 1 of the Supplemental Section D Questionnaire to HYSCO,'' (January 7, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On March 10, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review from April 4, 2015 to May 4, 2015, as permitted by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).\3\ We again, on April 15, 2015, extended the final results from May 4, 2015 to June 3, 2015.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum from Joseph Shuler, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations entitled ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' (March 10, 2015). \4\ See Memorandum from Joseph Shuler, to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations entitled ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' (April 15, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 26, 2015, we received case briefs from Wheatland Tube Company (Wheatland, or the petitioner), Husteel, and HYSCO.\5\ On February 2, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from Wheatland and HYSCO.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Case Brief of Wheatland Tube Company (Petitioner), ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Case Brief,'' (January 26, 2015); see also Case Brief of Husteel, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, Case No. A-580-809: Case Brief,'' (January 26, 2015), and see, also, Case Brief of HYSCO, ``Twenty-First Administrative Review of Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Case Brief and Request for Closed Hearing,'' (January 26, 2015). \6\ See Rebuttal Brief of Wheatland Tube Company, ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief of Wheatland Tube Company,'' (February 2, 2015), and see Rebuttal Brief from Hundai HYSCO, ``Twenty-First Administrative Review of Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief,'' (February 2, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2012-2013,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), and which is hereby adopted by this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes From the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested parties, we have made certain adjustments to define the universe of Husteel's U.S. sales.\7\ Also, based on our analysis of the comments received from interested parties, and the additional information we solicited from HYSCO, we have made certain changes to HYSCO's costs, HYSCO's General and Administrative expense calculation; and corrected certain errors related to grade code.\8\ For details regarding these changes, please refer to the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Memorandum to The File from Jennifer Meek, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Enforcement and Compliance Office I, ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Final Calculation Memorandum for Husteel Co., Ltd.'' (June 3, 2015). \8\ See Memorandum to The File from Joseph Shuler, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Enforcement and Compliance Office I, ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Final Calculation Memorandum for Hyundai HYSCO'' (June 3, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Husteel Co., Ltd........................................ 1.05 Hyundai HYSCO........................................... 0.80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties to these proceedings within five days of the date of publication of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. For assessment purposes, Husteel and HYSCO reported the name of the importer of record and the entered value for all of their sales to the United States during the period of review (POR). Accordingly, for each respondent, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel and HYSCO for which they did not [[Page 32939]] know were destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Husteel and HYSCO will be equal to the respective weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent, the ``all others'' rate established pursuant to a court decision.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3, 1995). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These final results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 3, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Differential Pricing Analysis Should Not Be Used Because the Cohen's d Test Does Not Measure Targeted or Masked Dumping Comment 2: Differential Pricing Analysis Reasoning for Use of Average-to-Transaction Comparison Methodology is Arbitrary and Unlawful Comment 3: Differential Pricing Analysis is Not Permitted to be Used in Administrative Reviews Comment 4: Defining the Universe of Sales Comment 5: Narrative Description of Calculation Methodology Contained An Error Comment 6: The Department Changed Its Practice Regarding Treatment of HYSCO's Costs Without Giving Prior Notice Comment 7: The Department Should Use GNA_I In Its Margin Calculation and Should Adjust HYSCO's Reported Costs Comment 8: HYSCO's Reported Costs and Control Number (CONNUM) Characteristics Are Consistent with the Department's Reporting Requirements and Should Not Be Reallocated Comment 9: The Petitioner's Analysis of HYSCO's Cost Reporting Does Not Support Revision To Costs and a Complete Reallocation of HYSCO's Cost is Unwarranted Comment 10: Cost Adjustments Eliminate Cost Differences Associated with Product Characteristics and Reallocating Total Material Costs Rather Than Only Hot-Coil Costs Is An Error Comment 11: The Department Should Adjust for Certain of HYSCO's Affiliated Hot-Rolled Coil Purchases Comment 12: The Department Should Adjust HYSCO's G&A Ratio Comment 13: Grade Coding Adjustments Contained Clerical Errors Comment 14: Draft Assessment Instructions Contained Errors Comment 15: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available is Warranted Due to HYSCO's Repeated Failure to Provide Necessary Information for Affiliated Hot-Rolled Coil Purchases [FR Doc. 2015-14214 Filed 6-9-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 10, 2015 / Notices 32937
responsibility, affiliation, or other Fabrication LLC/Indy Hanger, and US continues to govern business
connection in the conduct of trade or Hanger Company, LLC (collectively, proprietary information in this segment
business may also be made subject to Petitioners), the Department published of the proceeding. Timely written
the provisions of this Order in order to in the Federal Register the notice of notification of the return/destruction of
prevent evasion of this Order. initiation of countervailing duty APO materials or conversion to judicial
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of administrative review with respect to 50 protective order is hereby requested.
the Regulations, Collins-Avila may file companies for the period January 1, Failure to comply with the regulations
an appeal of this Order with the Under 2014, through December 31, 2014.2 and terms of an APO is a violation
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Petitioners were the only interested which is subject to sanction.
Security. The appeal must be filed parties to submit a request for this This notice is issued and published in
within 45 days from the date of this administrative review. On April 8, 2015, accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
Order and must comply with the Petitioners withdrew their request for 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
provisions of Part 756 of the review with respect to all 50 companies amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Regulations. in a timely manner.3 Dated: June 1, 2015.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be Rescission of the 2012–2013 Christian Marsh,
delivered to the Collins-Avila. This Administrative Review Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Order shall be published in the Federal and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Register. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative [FR Doc. 2015–14208 Filed 6–9–15; 8:45 am]
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect review, in whole or in part, if the parties BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
until September 24, 2024. that requested a review withdraw the
request within 90 days of the date of
Issued this 2nd day of June, 2015. publication of the notice of initiation of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Karen H. Nies-Vogel, the requested review. The Department
Director, Office of Exporter Services. published the Initiation on April 3, International Trade Administration
[FR Doc. 2015–14177 Filed 6–9–15; 8:45 am] 2015.4 Petitioners’ withdrawal of their [A–580–809]
BILLING CODE P
review request was submitted within
the 90-day period following the Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
publication of the Initiation and, thus, is From the Republic of Korea: Final
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE timely. Therefore, in accordance with 19 Results of Antidumping Duty
CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding Administrative Review; 2012–2013
International Trade Administration this review of the countervailing duty AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
order on certain steel wire garment International Trade Administration,
[C–552–813]
hangers from Vietnam in its entirety. Department of Commerce.
Certain Steel Wire Garment Hangers Assessment SUMMARY: On December 5, 2014, the
From the Socialist Republic of Department of Commerce (the
The Department will instruct U.S.
Vietnam: Rescission of Countervailing Department) published the Preliminary
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
Duty Administrative Review; 2014 Results of its administrative review of
assess countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries. For the companies the antidumping duty order on circular
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
for which this review is rescinded welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
International Trade Administration,
countervailing duties shall be assessed the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the
Department of Commerce.
at rates equal to the cash deposit of period November 1, 2012, through
DATES: Effective Date: June 10, 2015. October 31, 2013.1 The review covers
estimated countervailing duties required
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John two producers/exporters of the subject
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, merchandise, Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel)
warehouse, for consumption, during the
Enforcement and Compliance, and Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO), both of
period January 1, 2014, through
International Trade Administration, which were selected for individual
December 31, 2014, in accordance with
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th examination. As a result of our analysis
19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., of the comments received, these final
The Department intends to issue
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) results differ from our Preliminary
appropriate assessment instructions
482–1009. Results. For these final results, we
directly to CBP 15 days after publication
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of this notice. continue to find that Husteel and
HYSCO sold subject merchandise at
Background Notification Regarding Administrative prices less than normal value.
On February 2, 2015, the Department Protective Order DATES: Effective date: June 10, 2015.
of Commerce (the Department) This notice serves as a final reminder FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
published a notice of opportunity to to parties subject to administrative Joseph Shuler or Jennifer Meek, AD/
request an administrative review of the protective orders (APOs) of their CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
countervailing duty order on certain responsibility concerning the and Compliance, International Trade
steel wire garment hangers from the disposition of proprietary information Administration, U.S. Department of
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Socialist Republic of Vietnam disclosed under an APO in accordance Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
(Vietnam).1 with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
Pursuant to a request from M&B Metal
Products Company, Inc., Innovative 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and 1 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Request for Revocation in Part, 80 FR 18202 (April Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 3, 2015) (Initiation). Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 72168
3 See Petitioners’ April 8, 2015, submission.
to Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 5509 (December 5, 2014) (Preliminary Results) and
(February 2, 2015). 4 See Initiation. accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Jun 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33048/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 10, 2015 / Notices 32939
know were destined for the United Notification Regarding Administrative Comment 12: The Department Should Adjust
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate Protective Order HYSCO’s G&A Ratio
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate Comment 13: Grade Coding Adjustments
This notice also serves as a reminder Contained Clerical Errors
if there is no rate for the intermediate to parties subject to administrative Comment 14: Draft Assessment Instructions
company or companies involved in the protective order (APO) of their Contained Errors
transaction. For a full discussion of this responsibility concerning the Comment 15: Application of Total Adverse
clarification, see Antidumping and disposition of proprietary information Facts Available is Warranted Due to
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: disclosed under APO in accordance HYSCO’s Repeated Failure to Provide
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Necessary Information for Affiliated Hot-
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Rolled Coil Purchases
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment [FR Doc. 2015–14214 Filed 6–9–15; 8:45 am]
Cash Deposit Requirements
of the proceeding. Timely written BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The following cash deposit notification of the return or destruction
requirements will be effective upon of APO materials, or conversion to
publication of the notice of final results judicial protective order, is hereby DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
of administrative review for all requested. Failure to comply with the
shipments of subject merchandise National Oceanic and Atmospheric
regulations and the terms of an APO is
entered or withdrawn from warehouse, Administration
a sanctionable violation.
for consumption, on or after the date of
publication as provided by section Notification to Interested Parties Submission for OMB Review;
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash Comment Request
These final results of administrative
deposit rate for Husteel and HYSCO will review are issued and published in The Department of Commerce will
be equal to the respective weighted- accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and submit to the Office of Management and
average dumping margin established in 777(i)(1) of the Act. Budget (OMB) for clearance the
the final results of this review; (2) for following proposal for collection of
Dated: June 3, 2015.
merchandise exported by manufacturers information under the provisions of the
or exporters not covered in this review Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
but covered in a prior segment of the Chapter 35).
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will and Compliance.
Agency: National Oceanic and
continue to be the company-specific rate Appendix Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
published for the most recently Title: Highly Migratory Species
List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and
completed segment of this proceeding in Decision Memorandum Dealer, Importer and Exporter Reporting
which that manufacturer or exporter Family of Forms.
Comment 1: Differential Pricing Analysis
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a OMB Control Number: 0648–0040.
Should Not Be Used Because the Cohen’s
firm covered in this review, a prior d Test Does Not Measure Targeted or Form Number(s): None.
review, or the original investigation but Masked Dumping Type of Request: Revision and
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit Comment 2: Differential Pricing Analysis extension of a currently approved
rate will be the rate established for the Reasoning for Use of Average-to- information collection.
most recently completed segment of this Transaction Comparison Methodology is Number of Respondents: 9,585.
proceeding for the manufacturer of Arbitrary and Unlawful
Comment 3: Differential Pricing Analysis is Average Hours per Response: 5
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash minutes each for CD, SD, and RXC
Not Permitted to be Used in
deposit rate for all other manufacturers certificates; 15 minutes for CD/SD/RXC
Administrative Reviews
or exporters will continue to be 4.80 Comment 4: Defining the Universe of Sales validation by government official; 120
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established Comment 5: Narrative Description of minutes for authorization of non-
pursuant to a court decision.9 These Calculation Methodology Contained An governmental CD/SD/RXC validation; 2
cash deposit requirements, when Error minutes for daily Atlantic BFT landing
imposed, shall remain in effect until Comment 6: The Department Changed Its reports; 3 minutes for daily Atlantic
further notice. Practice Regarding Treatment of
HYSCO’s Costs Without Giving Prior BFT landing reports from pelagic
Notification to Importers Regarding the Notice longline and purse seine vessels; 1
Reimbursement of Duties Comment 7: The Department Should Use minute for Atlantic BFT tagging; 15
GNA_I In Its Margin Calculation and minutes for biweekly Atlantic BFT
This notice serves as a final reminder Should Adjust HYSCO’s Reported Costs dealer landing reports; 15 minutes for
to importers of their responsibility Comment 8: HYSCO’s Reported Costs and HMS international trade biweekly
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Control Number (CONNUM) reports; 15 minutes for weekly
certificate regarding the reimbursement Characteristics Are Consistent with the electronic HMS dealer landing reports
of antidumping duties prior to Department’s Reporting Requirements
and Should Not Be Reallocated
(e-dealer); 5 minutes for negative weekly
liquidation of the relevant entries electronic HMS dealer landing reports
during this review period. Failure to Comment 9: The Petitioner’s Analysis of
HYSCO’s Cost Reporting Does Not (e-dealer); 15 minutes for voluntary
comply with this requirement could fishing vessel and catch forms.
Support Revision To Costs and a
result in the Department’s presumption Complete Reallocation of HYSCO’s Cost Burden Hours: 39,961.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
that reimbursement of antidumping is Unwarranted Needs and Uses: This request is for
duties occurred and the subsequent Comment 10: Cost Adjustments Eliminate revision and extension of a currently
assessment of doubled antidumping Cost Differences Associated with Product approved information collection,
duties. Characteristics and Reallocating Total
Material Costs Rather Than Only Hot-
Under the provisions of the
9 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Coil Costs Is An Error Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended Comment 11: The Department Should Adjust Conservation and Management Act (16
Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3, for Certain of HYSCO’s Affiliated Hot- U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), the National Marine
1995). Rolled Coil Purchases Fisheries Service (NMFS) is responsible
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Jun 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33048/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:17:21
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:17:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Joseph Shuler or Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1293 or (202) 482-2778, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 32937 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR