80 FR 69899 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 218 (November 12, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 218 (November 12, 2015)
| Page Range | 69899-69903 | |
| FR Document | 2015-28559 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 69899-69903] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-28559] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2015-4810; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-090-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all [[Page 69900]] Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and all Airbus Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of blockage of Angle of Attack (AOA) probes during climb, leading to activation of the Alpha Protection (Alpha Prot) while the Mach number increased. This activation could cause a continuous nose-down pitch rate that cannot be stopped with backward sidestick input, even in the full backward position. For certain airplanes, this proposed AD would require replacing certain AOA sensors (probes) with certain new AOA sensors. For certain other airplanes, this proposed AD would also require inspections and functional heat testing of certain AOA sensors for discrepancies, and replacement if necessary. We are proposing this AD to prevent erroneous AOA information and Alpha Prot activation due to blocked AOA probes, which could result in a continuous nose-down command and consequent loss of control of the airplane. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 28, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 4810; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-4810; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-090-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0134, dated July 8, 2015 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340- 200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. The MCAI states: An occurrence was reported where an Airbus A321 aeroplane encountered a blockage of two Angle of Attack (AOA) probes during climb, leading to activation of the Alpha Protection (Alpha Prot) while the Mach number increased. The flight crew managed to regain full control and the flight landed uneventfully. It was determined that the affected AOA probes are also fitted on A330 and A340 aeroplanes. When Alpha Prot is activated due to blocked AOA probes, the flight control laws order a continuous nose down pitch rate that, in a worst case scenario, cannot be stopped with backward sidestick inputs, even in the full backward position. If the Mach number increases during a nose down order, the AOA value of the Alpha Prot will continue to decrease. As a result, the flight control laws will continue to order a nose down pitch rate, even if the speed is above minimum selectable speed, known as VLS. This condition, if not corrected, could result in loss of control of the aeroplane. Investigation results indicated that aeroplanes equipped with certain UTC Aerospace (UTAS, formerly known as Goodrich) AOA sensors, or equipped with certain SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensors, appear to have a greater susceptibility to adverse environmental conditions than aeroplanes equipped with the latest Thales AOA sensor, Part Number (P/N) C16291AB, which was designed to improve AOA indication behaviour in heavy rain conditions. Having determined that replacement of these AOA sensors is necessary to achieve and maintain the required safety level of the aeroplane, EASA issued AD 2015-0089, to require modification of the aeroplanes by replacement of the affected P/N sensors, and, after modification, prohibits (re-) installation of those P/N AOA sensors. That [EASA] AD also required repetitive detailed visual inspections (DET) and functional heating tests of certain Thales AOA sensors and provided an optional terminating action for those inspections. Since EASA AD 2015-0089 was issued, based on further analysis results, Airbus issued Operators Information Transmission (OIT) Ref. 999.0017/15 Revision 1, instructing operators to speed up the removal from service of UTAS P/N 0861ED2 AOA sensors. For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA AD 2015-0089, which is superseded, but reduces the compliance times for aeroplanes with UTAS P/N 0861ED2 AOA sensors installed. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 4810. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 Airbus has issued the following service information: Service Bulletin A330-34-3215, Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010. Service Bulletin A330-34-3228, dated October 7, 2009. Service Bulletin A330-34-3315, dated March 26, 2015. Service Bulletin A340-34-4215, Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010. [[Page 69901]] Service Bulletin A340-34-4234, dated October 7, 2009. Service Bulletin A340-34-4294, dated March 26, 2015. Service Bulletin A340-34-5062, Revision 01, dated March 29, 2010. Service Bulletin A340-34-5070, dated October 9, 2009. Service Bulletin A340-34-5105, dated March 26, 2015. The service information describes procedures for replacing certain pitot probes with certain new pitot probes. The service information also describes procedures for inspections and functional heat testing of certain pitot probes, and replacement if necessary. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM. FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these same type designs. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD affects 55 airplanes of U.S. registry. Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replacement...................... 5 work-hours x $85 per $0 $425............... $23,375 hour = $425. Inspection/test.................. 3 work-hours x $85 per 0 $255 per inspection/ 14,025 hour = $255. test cycle. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-4810; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM- 090-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by December 28, 2015. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to the airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, all manufacturer serial numbers. (1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes. (2) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313, -541, and -642 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a report of blockage of two Angle of Attack (AOA) probes during climb, leading to activation of the Alpha Protection (Alpha Prot) while the Mach number increased. This activation could cause a continuous nose-down pitch rate that cannot be stopped with backward sidestick input, even in the full backward position. We are issuing this AD to prevent erroneous AOA information and Alpha Prot activation due to blocked AOA probes, which could result in a continuous nose-down command and consequent loss of control of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Replacement of Certain UTAS AOA Sensors For airplanes on which any UTAS AOA sensor having part number (P/N) 0861ED or P/N 0861ED2 is installed: At the applicable time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, replace all Captain and First Officer AOA sensors (probes) having P/N 0861ED or 0861ED2 with AOA sensors having Thales P/N C16291AB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-34-3315, dated March 26, 2015 (for Model A330 airplanes). [[Page 69902]] (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-4294, dated March 26, 2015 (for Model A340-200 and -300 airplanes). (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-5105, dated March 26, 2015 (for Model A340-500 and -600 airplanes). (h) Compliance Times for the Requirements of Paragraph (g) of This AD Do the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD at the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD. (1) For airplanes with AOA sensors having P/N 0861ED: Within 22 months after the effective date of this AD. (2) For airplanes with AOA sensors having P/N 0861ED2: Within 7 months after the effective date of this AD. (i) Replacement of Certain SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA Sensors For airplanes on which any SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensor having P/N 45150320 is installed: Within 22 months after the effective date of this AD, replace all SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensors (probes) having P/N 45150320 with AOA sensors having Thales P/N C16291AB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD. (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-34-3228, dated October 7, 2009 (for Model A330-200 and -300 airplanes). (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-4234, dated October 7, 2009 (for Model A340-200 and -300 airplanes). (j) Repetitive Inspections/Tests of Certain Thales AOA Sensors For airplanes on which one or more Thales AOA sensor having P/N C16291AA is installed: Before the accumulation of 17,000 total flight hours on the AOA sensor since first installation on an airplane, or within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,800 flight hours; do a detailed inspection of the three AOA sensors at FINs 3FP1, 3FP2, and 3FP3 for discrepancies (e.g., the vane of the sensor does not deice properly), and a functional heating test of each AOA sensor having P/N C16291AA, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD. (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-34-3215, Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010 (for Model A330-200 and -300 airplanes). (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-4215, Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010 (for Model A340-200 and -300 airplanes). (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-5062, Revision 01, dated March 29, 2010 (for Model A340-500 and -600 airplanes). (k) Corrective Actions If any discrepancy is found during any inspection required by paragraph (j) of this AD, or if any test is failed during the heating test required by paragraph (j) of this AD: Before further flight, replace all affected AOA sensors with sensors identified in paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD. (1) Replace with AOA sensors having Thales P/N C16291AA, on which the inspection and test required by paragraph (j) of this AD were passed. (2) Replace with AOA sensors having Thales P/N C16291AB. (l) Airplanes Excluded From Certain Requirements (1) The actions specified in paragraphs (g), (i), (j), and (k) of this AD are not required, provided that the conditions specified in paragraphs (l)(1)(i), (l)(1)(ii), and (l)(1)(iii) of this AD are met. (i) Airbus Modification 58555 (installation of Thales P/N C16291AB AOA sensors) has been embodied in production. (ii) Airbus Modification 46921 (installation of UTAS AOA sensors) has not been embodied in production. (iii) No AOA sensor having SEXTANT/THOMSON P/N 45150320 or UTAS P/N 0861ED or P/N 0861ED2 has been installed on the airplane since date of issuance of the original airworthiness certificate or date of issuance of the original export certificate of airworthiness. (2) The actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD are not required, provided that all conditions specified in paragraphs (l)(2)(i), (l)(2)(ii), and (l)(2)(iii) of this AD are met. (i) Only AOA sensors with P/Ns approved after the effective date of this AD have been installed. (ii) The AOA sensor P/N is approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). (iii) The installation is accomplished in accordance with airplane modification instructions approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. (m) Optional Terminating Modification Replacement of all Thales AOA sensors having P/N C16291AA with Thales AOA sensors having P/N C16291AB, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information identified in paragraph (m)(1), (m)(2), or (m)(3) of this AD, terminates the repetitive inspections and functional heating tests required by paragraph (j) of this AD. (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-34-3228, dated October 7, 2009 (for Model A330-200 and -300 airplanes). (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-4234, dated October 7, 2009 (for Model A340-200 and -300 airplanes). (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-34-5070, dated October 9, 2009 (for Model A340-500 and -600 airplanes). (n) Parts Installation Prohibitions (1) For airplanes on which only Thales P/N C16291AB AOA sensors are installed as of the effective date of this AD: No person may install, on any airplane, a Thales AOA sensor having P/N C16291AA as of the effective date of this AD. (2) For airplanes on which the modification specified in paragraph (m) of this AD has been done: No person may install, on any airplane, a Thales AOA sensor having P/N C16291AA after accomplishing the specified modification. (3) For airplanes on which Thales P/N C16291AA or P/N C16291AB AOA sensors are installed as of the effective date of this AD: No person may install, on any airplane, a UTAS AOA sensor having P/N 0861ED or P/N 0861ED2, or a SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensor having P/N 45150320, as of the effective date of this AD. (4) For airplanes on which the replacement required by paragraph (i) of this AD has been done: No person may install, on any airplane, a UTAS AOA sensor having P/N 0861ED or P/N 0861ED2, or a SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensor having P/N 45150320, after accomplishing the replacement. (5) For airplanes on which the replacement required by paragraph (g) of this AD has been done: No person may install, on any airplane, a UTAS AOA sensor having P/N 0861ED or P/N 0861ED2, or a SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensor having P/N 45150320, after accomplishing the replacement, except that a UTAS AOA sensor having P/N 0861ED may be installed in the standby position of that airplane. (o) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (p) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0134, dated July 8, 2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by [[Page 69903]] searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-4810. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 30, 2015. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-28559 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules 69899
parts would cost about $1,577 per PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
product. Based on these figures, we DIRECTIVES Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
estimate the cost of this proposed AD on telephone 425–227–1112; fax 425–227–1149.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-
U.S. operators to be $190,848, or $7,952 AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
per product. continues to read as follows: any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended] standards district office/certificate holding
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding district office. The AMOC approval letter
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the following new airworthiness must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
section 106, describes the authority of directive (AD):
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (formerly actions from a manufacturer, the action must
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more known as Construcciones Aeronauticas, be accomplished using a method approved
detail the scope of the Agency’s S.A.): Docket No. FAA–2015–4809; by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
authority. Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–012–AD. 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
We are issuing this rulemaking under the European Aviation Safety Agency
(a) Comments Due Date (EASA); or EADS CASA’s EASA Design
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, We must receive comments by December Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 28, 2015. the DOA, the approval must include the
General requirements.’’ Under that DOA-authorized signature.
section, Congress charges the FAA with (b) Affected ADs
None. (i) Related Information
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
(c) Applicability Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
for practices, methods, and procedures
This AD applies to the Airbus Defense and Airworthiness Directive 2015–0011, dated
the Administrator finds necessary for Space S.A. (formerly known as January 20, 2015, for related information.
safety in air commerce. This regulation Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
is within the scope of that authority CN–235–200 and CN–235–300 airplanes, on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
because it addresses an unsafe condition certificated in any category, manufacturer by searching for and locating Docket No.
that is likely to exist or develop on serial numbers C–018 through C–211 FAA–2015–4809.
products identified in this rulemaking inclusive. (2) For service information identified in
action. this AD, contact EADS–CASA, Military
(d) Subject Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD),
Regulatory Findings Air Transport Association (ATA) of Integrated Customer Services (ICS),
America Code 26, Fire Protection. Technical Services, Avenida de Aragón 404,
We determined that this proposed AD 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585
would not have federalism implications (e) Reason 55 84; fax +34 91 585 55 05; email
under Executive Order 13132. This This AD was prompted by reports of false MTA.TechnicalService@casa.eads.net;
proposed AD would not have a engine fire warning events, which Internet http://www.eads.net.You may view
substantial direct effect on the States, on consequently led to engine in-flight shut this service information at the FAA,
down. We are issuing this AD to prevent Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
the relationship between the national Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
unnecessary in-flight-shutdown of an engine,
Government and the States, or on the which could result in reduced controllability on the availability of this material at the
distribution of power and of the airplane. FAA, call 425–227–1221.
responsibilities among the various Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
levels of government. (f) Compliance
30, 2015.
For the reasons discussed above, I Comply with this AD within the
Michael Kaszycki,
certify this proposed regulation: compliance times specified, unless already
done. Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (g) Modification of Engine Fire [FR Doc. 2015–28560 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
Extinguishing/Detection System
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures Within 18 months after the effective date
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); of this AD: Modify the location and routing
of the engine fire detection system, in DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in accordance with the Accomplishment
Alaska; and Instructions of EADS CASA Service Bulletin Federal Aviation Administration
4. Will not have a significant SB–235–26–0006, dated July 8, 2014.
economic impact, positive or negative, (h) Other FAA AD Provisions 14 CFR Part 39
on a substantial number of small entities
The following provisions also apply to this [Docket No. FAA–2015–4810; Directorate
under the criteria of the Regulatory AD:
Flexibility Act. Identifier 2015–NM–090–AD]
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International RIN 2120–AA64
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Directorate, FAA, has the authority to Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
safety, Incorporation by reference, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested Airplanes
Safety. using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your AGENCY: Federal Aviation
The Proposed Amendment request to your principal inspector or local Administration (FAA), DOT.
Flight Standards District Office, as ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority appropriate. If sending information directly (NPRM).
delegated to me by the Administrator, to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
39 as follows: International Branch, ANM–116, Transport airworthiness directive (AD) for all
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70117/page/1.svg)
![69900 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Airbus Model A330–200, –200 Examining the AD Docket Mach number increased. The flight crew
Freighter, and –300 series airplanes; and managed to regain full control and the flight
You may examine the AD docket on landed uneventfully. It was determined that
all Airbus Model A340–200, –300, –500, the Internet at http:// the affected AOA probes are also fitted on
and –600 series airplanes. This www.regulations.gov by searching for A330 and A340 aeroplanes.
proposed AD was prompted by a report and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– When Alpha Prot is activated due to
of blockage of Angle of Attack (AOA) 4810; or in person at the Docket blocked AOA probes, the flight control laws
probes during climb, leading to Management Facility between 9 a.m. order a continuous nose down pitch rate that,
activation of the Alpha Protection and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, in a worst case scenario, cannot be stopped
(Alpha Prot) while the Mach number with backward sidestick inputs, even in the
except Federal holidays. The AD docket full backward position. If the Mach number
increased. This activation could cause a contains this proposed AD, the increases during a nose down order, the AOA
continuous nose-down pitch rate that regulatory evaluation, any comments value of the Alpha Prot will continue to
cannot be stopped with backward received, and other information. The decrease. As a result, the flight control laws
sidestick input, even in the full street address for the Docket Operations will continue to order a nose down pitch
backward position. For certain office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in rate, even if the speed is above minimum
airplanes, this proposed AD would the ADDRESSES section. Comments will selectable speed, known as VLS.
require replacing certain AOA sensors This condition, if not corrected, could
be available in the AD docket shortly result in loss of control of the aeroplane.
(probes) with certain new AOA sensors. after receipt.
For certain other airplanes, this Investigation results indicated that
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: aeroplanes equipped with certain UTC
proposed AD would also require Aerospace (UTAS, formerly known as
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
inspections and functional heat testing Goodrich) AOA sensors, or equipped with
International Branch, ANM–116,
of certain AOA sensors for certain SEXTANT/THOMSON AOA sensors,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
discrepancies, and replacement if appear to have a greater susceptibility to
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA adverse environmental conditions than
necessary. We are proposing this AD to
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138; aeroplanes equipped with the latest Thales
prevent erroneous AOA information and
fax 425–227–1149. AOA sensor, Part Number (P/N) C16291AB,
Alpha Prot activation due to blocked
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: which was designed to improve AOA
AOA probes, which could result in a indication behaviour in heavy rain
continuous nose-down command and Comments Invited conditions.
consequent loss of control of the Having determined that replacement of
We invite you to send any written
airplane. these AOA sensors is necessary to achieve
relevant data, views, or arguments about and maintain the required safety level of the
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD. Send your comments aeroplane, EASA issued AD 2015–0089, to
this proposed AD by December 28, to an address listed under the require modification of the aeroplanes by
2015. ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. replacement of the affected P/N sensors, and,
FAA–2015–4810; Directorate Identifier after modification, prohibits (re-) installation
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 2015–NM–090–AD’’ at the beginning of of those P/N AOA sensors. That [EASA] AD
using the procedures found in 14 CFR your comments. We specifically invite also required repetitive detailed visual
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following comments on the overall regulatory, inspections (DET) and functional heating
methods: tests of certain Thales AOA sensors and
economic, environmental, and energy provided an optional terminating action for
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to aspects of this proposed AD. We will those inspections.
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the consider all comments received by the Since EASA AD 2015–0089 was issued,
instructions for submitting comments. closing date and may amend this based on further analysis results, Airbus
• Fax: 202–493–2251. proposed AD based on those comments. issued Operators Information Transmission
• Mail: U.S. Department of We will post all comments we (OIT) Ref. 999.0017/15 Revision 1,
receive, without change, to http:// instructing operators to speed up the removal
Transportation, Docket Operations, M– from service of UTAS P/N 0861ED2 AOA
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room www.regulations.gov, including any
sensors.
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., personal information you provide. We
For the reasons described above, this
Washington, DC 20590. will also post a report summarizing each [EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA
substantive verbal contact we receive
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of AD 2015–0089, which is superseded, but
about this proposed AD. reduces the compliance times for aeroplanes
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
with UTAS P/N 0861ED2 AOA sensors
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room Discussion installed.
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., The European Aviation Safety Agency
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 You may examine the MCAI in the
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent AD docket on the Internet at http://
p.m., Monday through Friday, except for the Member States of the European
Federal holidays. www.regulations.gov by searching for
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
For service information identified in Directive 2015–0134, dated July 8, 2015 4810.
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond Continuing Airworthiness Information, Related Service Information Under 1
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe CFR Part 51
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 condition for all Airbus Model A330– Airbus has issued the following
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
200, –200 Freighter, and –300 series service information:
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; airplanes; and Model A340–200, –300, • Service Bulletin A330–34–3215,
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You –500, and –600 series airplanes. The Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010.
may view this referenced service MCAI states: • Service Bulletin A330–34–3228,
information at the FAA, Transport An occurrence was reported where an dated October 7, 2009.
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue Airbus A321 aeroplane encountered a • Service Bulletin A330–34–3315,
SW., Renton, WA. For information on blockage of two Angle of Attack (AOA) dated March 26, 2015.
the availability of this material at the probes during climb, leading to activation of • Service Bulletin A340–34–4215,
FAA, call 425–227–1221. the Alpha Protection (Alpha Prot) while the Revision 02, dated March 29, 2010.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70117/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules 69901
• Service Bulletin A340–34–4234, functional heat testing of certain pitot bilateral agreement with the State of
dated October 7, 2009. probes, and replacement if necessary. Design Authority, we have been notified
• Service Bulletin A340–34–4294, This service information is reasonably of the unsafe condition described in the
dated March 26, 2015. available because the interested parties MCAI and service information
• Service Bulletin A340–34–5062, have access to it through their normal referenced above. We are proposing this
Revision 01, dated March 29, 2010. course of business or by the means AD because we evaluated all pertinent
• Service Bulletin A340–34–5070, identified in the ADDRESSES section of information and determined an unsafe
dated October 9, 2009. this NPRM. condition exists and is likely to exist or
• Service Bulletin A340–34–5105,
FAA’s Determination and Requirements develop on other products of these same
dated March 26, 2015.
The service information describes of This Proposed AD type designs.
procedures for replacing certain pitot This product has been approved by Costs of Compliance
probes with certain new pitot probes. the aviation authority of another
The service information also describes country, and is approved for operation We estimate that this proposed AD
procedures for inspections and in the United States. Pursuant to our affects 55 airplanes of U.S. registry.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
Replacement ................ 5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425 ............... $0 $425 ............................................... $23,375
Inspection/test .............. 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ............... 0 $255 per inspection/test cycle ....... 14,025
We have received no definitive data 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, all
that would enable us to provide a cost DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures manufacturer serial numbers.
estimate for the on-condition actions (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); (1) Airbus Model A330–201, –202, –203,
–223, –223F, –243, –243F, –301, –302, –303,
specified in this proposed AD. 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
–321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343
Alaska; and airplanes.
Authority for This Rulemaking
4. Will not have a significant (2) Airbus Model A340–211, –212, –213,
Title 49 of the United States Code economic impact, positive or negative, –311, –312, –313, –541, and –642 airplanes.
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue on a substantial number of small entities
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, (d) Subject
under the criteria of the Regulatory
section 106, describes the authority of Flexibility Act. Air Transport Association (ATA) of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: America Code 34, Navigation.
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
(e) Reason
detail the scope of the Agency’s Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation This AD was prompted by a report of
authority. safety, Incorporation by reference, blockage of two Angle of Attack (AOA)
We are issuing this rulemaking under Safety. probes during climb, leading to activation of
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, the Alpha Protection (Alpha Prot) while the
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: The Proposed Amendment Mach number increased. This activation
General requirements.’’ Under that Accordingly, under the authority could cause a continuous nose-down pitch
section, Congress charges the FAA with delegated to me by the Administrator, rate that cannot be stopped with backward
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part sidestick input, even in the full backward
position. We are issuing this AD to prevent
air commerce by prescribing regulations 39 as follows: erroneous AOA information and Alpha Prot
for practices, methods, and procedures activation due to blocked AOA probes, which
the Administrator finds necessary for PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS could result in a continuous nose-down
safety in air commerce. This regulation DIRECTIVES command and consequent loss of control of
is within the scope of that authority the airplane.
because it addresses an unsafe condition ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows: (f) Compliance
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
action.
§ 39.13 [Amended] done.
Regulatory Findings ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding (g) Replacement of Certain UTAS AOA
We determined that this proposed AD the following new airworthiness Sensors
would not have federalism implications directive (AD): For airplanes on which any UTAS AOA
under Executive Order 13132. This Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–4810; sensor having part number (P/N) 0861ED or
proposed AD would not have a Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–090–AD. P/N 0861ED2 is installed: At the applicable
substantial direct effect on the States, on time specified in paragraph (h) of this AD,
(a) Comments Due Date replace all Captain and First Officer AOA
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the We must receive comments by December sensors (probes) having P/N 0861ED or
28, 2015. 0861ED2 with AOA sensors having Thales P/
distribution of power and
N C16291AB, in accordance with the
responsibilities among the various (b) Affected ADs Accomplishment Instructions of the
levels of government. None. applicable service information identified in
For the reasons discussed above, I paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD.
certify this proposed regulation: (c) Applicability (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330–34–3315,
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory This AD applies to the airplanes, dated March 26, 2015 (for Model A330
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; certificated in any category, identified in airplanes).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70117/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules 69903
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following FAA–2015–4212; Directorate Identifier
2015–4810. methods: 2015–NM–010–AD’’ at the beginning of
(2) For service information identified in • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to your comments. We specifically invite
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the comments on the overall regulatory,
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
instructions for submitting comments. economic, environmental, and energy
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email • Fax: 202–493–2251. aspects of this proposed AD. We will
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; • Mail: U.S. Department of consider all comments received by the
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may Transportation, Docket Operations, M– closing date and may amend this
view this service information at the FAA, 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room proposed AD based on those comments.
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., We will post all comments we
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information Washington, DC 20590. receive, without change, to http://
on the availability of this material at the • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of www.regulations.gov, including any
FAA, call 425–227–1221. Transportation, Docket Operations, M– personal information you provide. We
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room will also post a report summarizing each
30, 2015. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., substantive verbal contact we receive
Michael Kaszycki, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 about this proposed AD.
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. Federal holidays. Discussion
[FR Doc. 2015–28559 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am] For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact BAE Systems The European Aviation Safety Agency
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(Operations) Limited, Customer (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
Information Department, Prestwick for the Member States of the European
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom; Directive 2012–0191R1, dated
Federal Aviation Administration telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 November 6, 2012 (referred to after this
1292 675704; email RApublications@ as the Mandatory Continuing
14 CFR Part 39 baesystems.com; Internet http:// Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
www.baesystems.com/Businesses/ MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
[Docket No. FAA–2015–4212; Directorate for all BAE Systems (Operations)
Identifier 2015–NM–010–AD] RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may
view this referenced service information Limited Model BAe 146 series airplanes
RIN 2120–AA64
at the FAA, Transport Airplane and Model Avro 146–RJ series airplanes.
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., The MCAI states:
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Renton, WA. For information on the Several occurrences of the aeroplane‘s
Systems (Operations) Limited
availability of this material at the FAA, Nose Landing Gear (NLG) Main Fitting
Airplanes cracking have been reported. Subsequently in
call 425–227–1221.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation different cases, NLG Main Fitting crack lead
Administration (FAA), DOT. Examining the AD Docket to collapsed NLG, locked NLG steering and
an aeroplane‘s un-commanded steering to the
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking You may examine the AD docket on left.
(NPRM). the Internet at http:// Cracks in the NLG Bell Housing are not
www.regulations.gov by searching for detectable with the NLG fitted to the
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– aeroplane and are difficult to detect during
airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE 4212; or in person at the Docket overhaul without substantial disassembly of
Systems (Operations) Limited Model Management Facility between 9 a.m. the gear.
BAe 146 series airplanes and Model and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, This condition, if not corrected, could lead
Avro 146–RJ series airplanes. This except Federal holidays. The AD docket to degradation of directional control on the
proposed AD was prompted by reports ground or an un-commanded turn to the left
contains this proposed AD, the
of cracking of the main fitting of the and a consequent loss of control of the
regulatory evaluation, any comments aeroplane on the ground, possibly resulting
nose landing gear (NLG) and a received, and other information. The in damage to the aeroplane and injury to
determination that a new safe-life street address for the Docket Operations occupants.
limitation for affected NLG main fittings office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in Prompted by these findings, BAE Systems
has not been mandated. This proposed the ADDRESSES section. Comments will (Operations) Ltd issued Inspection Service
AD would require replacing affected be available in the AD docket shortly Bulletin (ISB) 32–186 (hereafter referred to as
NLG main fittings that have exceeded after receipt. the ISB) to introduce a new safe life of 16,000
the safe-life limitation with a new or flight cycles (FC) for certain NLG main
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
serviceable fitting. We are proposing fittings, having a Part Number (P/N) as
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, identified in Paragraph 1A, tables 1, 2 and 3
this AD to prevent collapse of the NLG, International Branch, ANM–116, of the ISB.
which if not corrected, could lead to Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, To correct this unsafe condition, EASA
degradation of direction control on the 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA issued [EASA] AD 2012–0191 to require
ground or an un-commanded turn to the 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1175; implementation of the new safe-life
left, and a consequent loss of control of fax 425–227–1149. limitation for the affected NLG main fittings
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the airplane on the ground, possibly and replacement of fittings that have already
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
resulting in damage to the airplane and exceeded the new limit.
injury to occupants. Comments Invited * * * * *
DATES: We must receive comments on We invite you to send any written You may examine the MCAI in the
this proposed AD by December 28, relevant data, views, or arguments about AD docket on the Internet at http://
2015. this proposed AD. Send your comments www.regulations.gov by searching for
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, to an address listed under the and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
using the procedures found in 14 CFR ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 4212.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Nov 10, 2015 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM 12NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_70117/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-14 14:53:57
Document Modified: 2015-12-14 14:53:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 28, 2015. | |
| Contact | Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 69899 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR