80_FR_79340 80 FR 79097 - Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination to Review an Initial Determination in Part and, on Review, To Affirm a Finding of a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding

80 FR 79097 - Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Commission's Determination to Review an Initial Determination in Part and, on Review, To Affirm a Finding of a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 243 (December 18, 2015)

Page Range79097-79099
FR Document2015-31817

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review-in-part the initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on October 28, 2015, granting summary determination that 17 defaulting respondents have violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. On review, the Commission affirms with modifications the ALJ's findings regarding the importation requirement. The Commission's determination results in a determination of a violation of section 337. Accordingly, the Commission requests written submissions, under the schedule set forth below, on remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 243 (Friday, December 18, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 243 (Friday, December 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79097-79099]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-946]


Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Commission's 
Determination to Review an Initial Determination in Part and, on 
Review, To Affirm a Finding of a Violation of Section 337; Request for 
Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review-in-part the initial determination 
(``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on 
October 28, 2015,

[[Page 79098]]

granting summary determination that 17 defaulting respondents have 
violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 
1337. On review, the Commission affirms with modifications the ALJ's 
findings regarding the importation requirement. The Commission's 
determination results in a determination of a violation of section 337. 
Accordingly, the Commission requests written submissions, under the 
schedule set forth below, on remedy, the public interest, and bonding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 27, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland Inc. 
of Hillsboro, Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, California; 
and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan (collectively, ``Epson''). 80 FR 
4314-16 (Jan. 27, 2015). The complaint alleged violations of section 
337 by reason of the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain ink cartridges and components thereof that infringe certain 
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,366,233 (``the '233 patent''); 8,454,116 
(``the '116 patent''); 8,794,749 (``the '749 patent''); 8,801,163 
(``the '163 patent''); and 8,882,513 (``the '513 patent''). Id. The 
notice of investigation named 19 respondents. See id. The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations is a party in this investigation.
    Respondents Zhuhai Nano Digital Technology, Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, 
China and Nano Business and Technology, Inc. of Lake Oswego, Oregon 
were terminated from the investigation based upon a settlement 
agreement and consent order. See Notice of Commission Determination Not 
to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to 
Certain Respondents Based on a Settlement Agreement and Consent Order; 
Issuance of a Consent Order (Aug. 5, 2015).
    The remaining 17 respondents were found in default. See Notice of a 
Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Finding 
Certain Respondents in Default (July 10, 2015).
    On August 31, 2015, Epson moved for a summary determination of a 
violation of section 337 by the defaulting respondents and for issuance 
of a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. On September 
11, 2015, the Commission Investigative Attorney (``IA'') filed a 
response in support of the motion. No other responses to the motion 
were received.
    On September 16, 2015, the ALJ issued an ID partially terminating 
the investigation based on Epson's withdrawal of certain claims. See 
Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Part as to Certain 
Claims (Oct. 15, 2015). Claims 1 and 10 of the '233 patent; claims 9, 
14, 18, and 21 of the '116 patent; claims 1, 18, 49, and 60 of the '749 
patent; claims 1 and 6 of the '163 patent; and claims 14, 15, and 19 of 
the '513 patent remain pending in this investigation. See Order No. 12 
at 8-19.
    On October 28, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting Epson's 
motion for summary determination of violation and recommending the 
issuance of a general exclusion order and cease and desist orders. See 
Order No. 12. No party petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined to review only the importation 
analysis in the ID. Upon review, the Commission affirms a finding that 
Epson has met the importation requirement. In addition to the specific 
instances of importation by each defaulting respondent identified in 
the ID, the record evidence supports a finding that respondent Zhuhai 
National, through its intermediary respondent Huebon, sold and imported 
accused ink cartridge control no. 7579 (Group 4 cartridge) in 2014. 
Seitz 2015 Decl. ] 39; Seitz Ex. 1.170. In addition, the record 
evidence supports a finding that respondent Zinyaw sold accused ink 
cartridge control no. 7556 (Group 5 cartridge) after they were imported 
into the United States in 2014. Seitz 2015 Decl. ] 156; Seitz Ex. 
1.215.
    In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the 
Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of 
the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) 
issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the 
respondent(s) being required to cease and desist from engaging in 
unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, 
the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that 
address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party 
seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for 
purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate 
and provide information establishing that activities involving other 
types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. 
For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via 
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 
1994) (Commission Opinion).
    If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must 
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The 
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an 
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the 
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. 
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly 
competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 
consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written 
submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in 
the context of this investigation.
    If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade 
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve 
or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of 
July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the 
subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under 
bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in 
receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be 
imposed if a remedy is ordered.
    Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested 
government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to 
file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, 
and bonding. Complainant and the IA are also requested to submit 
proposed remedial orders for the Commission's

[[Page 79099]]

consideration. Complainant is further requested to state the date that 
the patents expire and the HTSUS subheadings under which the accused 
products are imported, and provide identification information for all 
known importers of the subject articles.
    Written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no 
later than close of business on Wednesday, December 30, 2015. Reply 
submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on 
Wednesday, January 6, 2015. Such submissions should address the ALJ's 
recommended determinations on remedy and bonding which were made in 
Order No. 12. No further submissions on any of these issues will be 
permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
    Persons filing written submissions must file the original document 
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit eight 
(8) true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next 
day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the 
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-946'') in a prominent place on 
the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic 
Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions 
regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000). Any 
person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence 
must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be 
directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full 
statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such 
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment 
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A 
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed 
simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential 
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the 
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
    The authority for the Commission's determinations is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-31817 Filed 12-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Notices                                                  79097

                                                  and bond. On November 3, 2015,                          Commission should contact the Office                    written statement (which shall not
                                                  NVIDIA, Respondents, and the Office of                  of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.                       contain any new factual information)
                                                  Unfair Import Investigations filed                      General information concerning the                      pertinent to the review by January 5,
                                                  responses to the petitions and                          Commission may also be obtained by                      2016. However, should the Department
                                                  contingent petitions. Having examined                   accessing its internet server (http://                  of Commerce extend the time limit for
                                                  the record of this investigation,                       www.usitc.gov). The public record for                   its completion of the final results of its
                                                  including the ID, the petition for review,              this review may be viewed on the                        review, the deadline for comments
                                                  the contingent petition thereto, and the                Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)                   (which may not contain new factual
                                                  respective responses, the Commission                    at http://edis.usitc.gov.                               information) on Commerce’s final
                                                  has determined not to review the ID.                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              results is three business days after the
                                                    On September 24, 2015, NVIDIA filed                      Background.—On December 7, 2015,                     issuance of Commerce’s results. If
                                                  an Unopposed Motion to Terminate the                    the Commission determined that the                      comments contain business proprietary
                                                  Investigation as to Respondent Samsung                  domestic interested party group                         information (BPI), they must conform
                                                  Telecommunications America, LLC. We                     response to its notice of institution (80               with the requirements of sections 201.6,
                                                  have reviewed the motion, and it is                     FR 52793, September 1, 2015) of the                     207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
                                                  granted.                                                subject five-year review was adequate                   rules. Please be aware that the
                                                    The authority for the Commission’s                    and that the respondent interested party                Commission’s rules with respect to
                                                  determination is contained in section                   group response was inadequate.1 The                     filing have changed. The most recent
                                                  337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       Commission did not find any other                       amendments took effect on July 25,
                                                  amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in                        circumstances that would warrant                        2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014),
                                                  sections 210.42 46 of the Commission’s                  conducting a full review.2 Accordingly,                 and the revised Commission Handbook
                                                  Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                 the Commission determined that it                       on E-filing, available from the
                                                  210.42 46).                                             would conduct an expedited review                       Commission’s Web site at http://
                                                    By order of the Commission.                           pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the                    edis.usitc.gov.
                                                                                                          Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).                 In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
                                                    Issued: December 14, 2015.
                                                                                                             For further information concerning                   and 207.3 of the rules, each document
                                                  Lisa R. Barton,
                                                                                                          the conduct of this review and rules of                 filed by a party to the review must be
                                                  Secretary to the Commission.                                                                                    served on all other parties to the review
                                                                                                          general application, consult the
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–31816 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]                                                                    (as identified by either the public or BPI
                                                                                                          Commission’s Rules of Practice and
                                                  BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                          Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B                   service list), and a certificate of service
                                                                                                          (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,                        must be timely filed. The Secretary will
                                                                                                          subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part                    not accept a document for filing without
                                                  INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                                                                             a certificate of service.
                                                                                                          207).
                                                  COMMISSION                                                 Staff report.—A staff report                           Authority: This review is being conducted
                                                  [Investigation No. 731–TA–125 (Fourth                   containing information concerning the                   under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
                                                  Review)]                                                subject matter of the review will be                    of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
                                                                                                          placed in the nonpublic record on                       section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
                                                  Potassium Permanganate From China;                      December 28, 2015, and made available                     By order of the Commission.
                                                  Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year                    to persons on the Administrative                          Issued: December 14, 2015.
                                                  Review                                                  Protective Order service list for this                  Lisa R. Barton,
                                                  AGENCY: United States International                     review. A public version will be issued
                                                                                                                                                                  Secretary to the Commission.
                                                  Trade Commission.                                       thereafter, pursuant to section
                                                                                                                                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–31809 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                                                                                 BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                             Written submissions.—As provided in
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Commission hereby gives                  section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
                                                  notice of the scheduling of an expedited                rules, interested parties that are parties
                                                                                                                                                                  INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                  review pursuant to the Tariff Act of                    to the review and that have provided
                                                                                                                                                                  COMMISSION
                                                  1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether                 individually adequate responses to the
                                                  revocation of the antidumping duty                      notice of institution,3 and any party                   [Investigation No. 337–TA–946]
                                                  order on potassium permanganate from                    other than an interested party to the
                                                                                                          review may file written comments with                   Certain Ink Cartridges and
                                                  China would be likely to lead to                                                                                Components Thereof; Commission’s
                                                  continuation or recurrence of material                  the Secretary on what determination the
                                                                                                          Commission should reach in the review.                  Determination to Review an Initial
                                                  injury within a reasonably foreseeable                                                                          Determination in Part and, on Review,
                                                  time.                                                   Comments are due on or before January
                                                                                                          5, 2016 and may not contain new factual                 To Affirm a Finding of a Violation of
                                                  DATES:   Effective Date: December 7,                    information. Any person that is neither                 Section 337; Request for Written
                                                  2015.                                                   a party to the five-year review nor an                  Submissions on Remedy, the Public
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        interested party may submit a brief                     Interest, and Bonding
                                                  Michael Szustakowski ((202) 205–3169),                                                                          AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                            1A  record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
                                                  Office of Investigations, U.S.                                                                                  Commission.
                                                                                                          Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  International Trade Commission, 500 E                   individual Commissioner’s statements will be            ACTION: Notice.
                                                  Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.                       available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
                                                  Hearing-impaired persons can obtain                     Commission’s Web site.                                  SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
                                                  information on this matter by contacting                  2 Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent voted to
                                                                                                                                                                  the U.S. International Trade
                                                  the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–                   conduct a full review.                                  Commission has determined to review-
                                                                                                            3 The Commission has found the response
                                                  205–1810. Persons with mobility                         submitted by Carus Corporation to be individually
                                                                                                                                                                  in-part the initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
                                                  impairments who will need special                       adequate. Comments from other interested parties        issued by the presiding administrative
                                                  assistance in gaining access to the                     will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).         law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on October 28, 2015,


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:20 Dec 17, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000    Frm 00070   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM   18DEN1


                                                  79098                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                  granting summary determination that 17                  investigation based upon a settlement                 Commission may (1) issue an order that
                                                  defaulting respondents have violated                    agreement and consent order. See                      could result in the exclusion of the
                                                  section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as               Notice of Commission Determination                    subject articles from entry into the
                                                  amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. On review,                     Not to Review an Initial Determination                United States, and/or (2) issue one or
                                                  the Commission affirms with                             Terminating the Investigation as to                   more cease and desist orders that could
                                                  modifications the ALJ’s findings                        Certain Respondents Based on a                        result in the respondent(s) being
                                                  regarding the importation requirement.                  Settlement Agreement and Consent                      required to cease and desist from
                                                  The Commission’s determination results                  Order; Issuance of a Consent Order                    engaging in unfair acts in the
                                                  in a determination of a violation of                    (Aug. 5, 2015).                                       importation and sale of such articles.
                                                  section 337. Accordingly, the                              The remaining 17 respondents were                  Accordingly, the Commission is
                                                  Commission requests written                             found in default. See Notice of a                     interested in receiving written
                                                  submissions, under the schedule set                     Commission Determination Not to                       submissions that address the form of
                                                  forth below, on remedy, the public                      Review an Initial Determination Finding               remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
                                                  interest, and bonding.                                  Certain Respondents in Default (July 10,              If a party seeks exclusion of an article
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        2015).                                                from entry into the United States for
                                                  Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the                      On August 31, 2015, Epson moved for                purposes other than entry for
                                                  General Counsel, U.S. International                     a summary determination of a violation                consumption, the party should so
                                                  Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,                     of section 337 by the defaulting                      indicate and provide information
                                                                                                          respondents and for issuance of a                     establishing that activities involving
                                                  Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                                                                                          general exclusion order and cease and                 other types of entry either are adversely
                                                  205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
                                                                                                          desist orders. On September 11, 2015,                 affecting it or likely to do so. For
                                                  documents filed in connection with this
                                                                                                          the Commission Investigative Attorney                 background, see Certain Devices for
                                                  investigation are or will be available for
                                                                                                          (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of the           Connecting Computers via Telephone
                                                  inspection during official business
                                                                                                          motion. No other responses to the                     Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
                                                  hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                                                                          motion were received.                                 Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
                                                  Office of the Secretary, U.S.                              On September 16, 2015, the ALJ
                                                  International Trade Commission, 500 E                                                                         (Commission Opinion).
                                                                                                          issued an ID partially terminating the                   If the Commission contemplates some
                                                  Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                       investigation based on Epson’s                        form of remedy, it must consider the
                                                  telephone (202) 205–2000. General                       withdrawal of certain claims. See Notice              effects of that remedy upon the public
                                                  information concerning the Commission                   of a Commission Determination Not to                  interest. The factors the Commission
                                                  may also be obtained by accessing its                   Review an Initial Determination                       will consider include the effect that an
                                                  Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov.                Terminating the Investigation in Part as              exclusion order and/or cease and desist
                                                  The public record for this investigation                to Certain Claims (Oct. 15, 2015). Claims             orders would have on (1) the public
                                                  may be viewed on the Commission’s                       1 and 10 of the ’233 patent; claims 9, 14,            health and welfare, (2) competitive
                                                  electronic docket (EDIS) at http://                     18, and 21 of the ’116 patent; claims 1,              conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S.
                                                  edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                        18, 49, and 60 of the ’749 patent; claims             production of articles that are like or
                                                  persons are advised that information on                 1 and 6 of the ’163 patent; and claims                directly competitive with those that are
                                                  this matter can be obtained by                          14, 15, and 19 of the ’513 patent remain              subject to investigation, and (4) U.S.
                                                  contacting the Commission’s TDD                         pending in this investigation. See Order              consumers. The Commission is
                                                  terminal on (202) 205–1810.                             No. 12 at 8–19.                                       therefore interested in receiving written
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                             On October 28, 2015, the ALJ issued                submissions that address the
                                                  Commission instituted this investigation                the subject ID granting Epson’s motion                aforementioned public interest factors
                                                  on January 27, 2015, based on a                         for summary determination of violation                in the context of this investigation.
                                                  complaint filed by Epson Portland Inc.                  and recommending the issuance of a                       If the Commission orders some form
                                                  of Hillsboro, Oregon; Epson America,                    general exclusion order and cease and                 of remedy, the U.S. Trade
                                                  Inc. of Long Beach, California; and                     desist orders. See Order No. 12. No                   Representative, as delegated by the
                                                  Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan                        party petitioned for review of the ID.                President, has 60 days to approve or
                                                  (collectively, ‘‘Epson’’). 80 FR 4314–16                   The Commission has determined to                   disapprove the Commission’s action.
                                                  (Jan. 27, 2015). The complaint alleged                  review only the importation analysis in               See Presidential Memorandum of July
                                                  violations of section 337 by reason of                  the ID. Upon review, the Commission                   21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
                                                  the importation into the United States,                 affirms a finding that Epson has met the              During this period, the subject articles
                                                  the sale for importation, and the sale                  importation requirement. In addition to               would be entitled to enter the United
                                                  within the United States after                          the specific instances of importation by              States under bond, in an amount
                                                  importation of certain ink cartridges and               each defaulting respondent identified in              determined by the Commission and
                                                  components thereof that infringe certain                the ID, the record evidence supports a                prescribed by the Secretary of the
                                                  claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,366,233                    finding that respondent Zhuhai                        Treasury. The Commission is therefore
                                                  (‘‘the ’233 patent’’); 8,454,116 (‘‘the ’116            National, through its intermediary                    interested in receiving submissions
                                                  patent’’); 8,794,749 (‘‘the ’749 patent’’);             respondent Huebon, sold and imported                  concerning the amount of the bond that
                                                  8,801,163 (‘‘the ’163 patent’’); and                    accused ink cartridge control no. 7579                should be imposed if a remedy is
                                                  8,882,513 (‘‘the ’513 patent’’). Id. The                (Group 4 cartridge) in 2014. Seitz 2015               ordered.
                                                  notice of investigation named 19                        Decl. ¶ 39; Seitz Ex. 1.170. In addition,                Written Submissions: Parties to the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  respondents. See id. The Office of                      the record evidence supports a finding                investigation, interested government
                                                  Unfair Import Investigations is a party                 that respondent Zinyaw sold accused                   agencies, and any other interested
                                                  in this investigation.                                  ink cartridge control no. 7556 (Group 5               parties are encouraged to file written
                                                     Respondents Zhuhai Nano Digital                      cartridge) after they were imported into              submissions on the issues of remedy,
                                                  Technology, Co., Ltd. of Guangdong,                     the United States in 2014. Seitz 2015                 the public interest, and bonding.
                                                  China and Nano Business and                             Decl. ¶ 156; Seitz Ex. 1.215.                         Complainant and the IA are also
                                                  Technology, Inc. of Lake Oswego,                           In connection with the final                       requested to submit proposed remedial
                                                  Oregon were terminated from the                         disposition of this investigation, the                orders for the Commission’s


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:20 Dec 17, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00071   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM   18DEN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Notices                                            79099

                                                  consideration. Complainant is further                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                   permitting electronic submission of
                                                  requested to state the date that the                                                                            responses.
                                                                                                          [OMB Number 1140–0076]
                                                  patents expire and the HTSUS
                                                                                                                                                                Overview of This Information
                                                  subheadings under which the accused                     Agency Information Collection                         Collection
                                                  products are imported, and provide                      Activities; Proposed eCollection
                                                  identification information for all known                eComments Requested; Revision of a                       1. Type of Information Collection:
                                                  importers of the subject articles.                      Previously Approved Collection Relief                 Revision of a currently approved
                                                     Written submissions and proposed                                                                           collection.
                                                                                                          of Disabilities and Application for
                                                  remedial orders must be filed no later                                                                           2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
                                                                                                          Restoration of Explosive Privileges
                                                  than close of business on Wednesday,                                                                          Relief of Disabilities and Application for
                                                  December 30, 2015. Reply submissions                    AGENCY:  Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,                  Restoration of Explosives Privileges.
                                                  must be filed no later than the close of                Firearms and Explosives, Department of                   3. The agency form number, if any,
                                                  business on Wednesday, January 6,                       Justice.                                              and the applicable component of the
                                                  2015. Such submissions should address                   ACTION: 60-day notice.                                Department sponsoring the collection:
                                                  the ALJ’s recommended determinations                                                                          The form number is 5400.29. The
                                                  on remedy and bonding which were                        SUMMARY:    The Department of Justice                 applicable component within the
                                                  made in Order No. 12. No further                        (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,                    Department of Justice is the Bureau of
                                                  submissions on any of these issues will                 Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will be                Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
                                                  be permitted unless otherwise ordered                   submitting the following information                  Explosives, in the Explosives
                                                  by the Commission.                                      collection request to the Office of                   Enforcement Branch.
                                                     Persons filing written submissions                   Management and Budget (OMB) for                          4. Affected public who will be asked
                                                  must file the original document                         review and approval in accordance with                or required to respond, as well as a brief
                                                  electronically on or before the deadlines               the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                  abstract:
                                                  stated above and submit eight (8) true                  DATES: Comments are encouraged and                       Primary: Individuals.
                                                  paper copies to the Office of the                       will be accepted for 60 days until                       Other (if applicable): None.
                                                  Secretary by noon the next day pursuant                 February 16, 2016.                                       Abstract: ATF is charged with the
                                                  to section 210.4(f) of the Commission’s                 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If                   responsibility for enforcing Title XI of
                                                  Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                 you have additional comments                          the Organized Crime Control Act (the
                                                  210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to                  especially on the estimated public                    Act) of 1970 and the implementing
                                                  the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.                    burden or associated response time,                   regulations contained at 27 CFR, Part
                                                  337–TA–946’’) in a prominent place on                   suggestions, or need a copy of the                    555. Subtitle C of Public Law 107–296,
                                                  the cover page and/or the first page. (See              proposed information collection                       the Safe Explosives Act, enacted
                                                  Handbook for Electronic Filing                          instrument with instructions or                       November 25, 2003, amended the Act to
                                                  Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/                       additional information, please contact                give the Director authority to grant relief
                                                  secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/                        Laurie O’ Lena, 3750 Corporal Road,                   from disability for any person who is
                                                  handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).                     Huntsville, AL 35898 at email or                      prohibited from shipping, transporting,
                                                  Persons with questions regarding filing                 telephone: EROD@atf.gov or (256) 261–                 receiving, or possessing an explosive
                                                  should contact the Secretary (202–205–                  7640.                                                 under section 842(i) of the Act. The
                                                  2000). Any person desiring to submit a
                                                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written                    regulations at 27 CFR, Section 555.142
                                                  document to the Commission in
                                                                                                          comments and suggestions from the                     state that the Director may grant relief
                                                  confidence must request confidential
                                                                                                          public and affected agencies concerning               to an applicant if it is established to the
                                                  treatment. All such requests should be
                                                                                                          the proposed collection of information                satisfaction of the Director that the
                                                  directed to the Secretary to the
                                                                                                          are encouraged. Your comments should                  circumstances regarding the disability
                                                  Commission and must include a full
                                                                                                          address one or more of the following                  and the applicant’s record and
                                                  statement of the reasons why the
                                                                                                          four points:                                          reputation are such that the applicant
                                                  Commission should grant such
                                                                                                          —Evaluate whether the proposed                        will not be likely to act in a manner
                                                  treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
                                                                                                             collection of information is necessary             dangerous to public safety. The ATF
                                                  for which confidential treatment by the
                                                                                                             for the proper performance of the                  Form 5400.29, Application for
                                                  Commission is properly sought will be
                                                                                                             functions of the Bureau of Alcohol,                Restoration of Explosives Privileges, is
                                                  treated accordingly. A redacted non-
                                                                                                             Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives,                  used by ATF to conduct background
                                                  confidential version of the document
                                                                                                             including whether the information                  investigations on all applicants for
                                                  must also be filed simultaneously with
                                                                                                             will have practical utility;                       restoration of explosives privileges. In
                                                  any confidential filing. All non-
                                                                                                          —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s                an effort to ensure that any person
                                                  confidential written submissions will be
                                                                                                             estimate of the burden of the                      applying for restoration of explosives
                                                  available for public inspection at the
                                                                                                             proposed collection of information,                privileges has a record and reputation
                                                  Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
                                                     The authority for the Commission’s                      including the validity of the                      such that the applicant will not be likely
                                                  determinations is contained in section                     methodology and assumptions used;                  to act in a manner dangerous to public
                                                  337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       —Evaluate whether and if so how the                   safety and that the granting of such
                                                  amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                      quality, utility, and clarity of the               relief would not be contrary to the
                                                  210 of the Commission’s Rules of                           information to be collected can be                 public interest, ATF proposes that all
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                        enhanced; and                                      applicants complete ATF Form 5400.29.
                                                  210).                                                   —Minimize the burden of the collection                   5. An estimate of the total number of
                                                                                                             of information on those who are to                 respondents and the amount of time
                                                    By order of the Commission.                              respond, including through the use of              estimated for an average respondent to
                                                  Lisa R. Barton,                                            appropriate automated, electronic,                 respond: We estimated that there are a
                                                  Secretary to the Commission.                               mechanical, or other technological                 total of 300 respondents associated with
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–31817 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]               collection techniques or other forms               this information collection request. We
                                                  BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                     of information technology, e.g.,                   estimate that each respondent will


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:20 Dec 17, 2015   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00072   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM   18DEN1



Document Created: 2015-12-18 01:38:48
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 01:38:48
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactMichael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation80 FR 79097 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR