81 FR 36264 - Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2009-2010
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 108 (June 6, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 108 (June 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 36264-36265 | |
| FR Document | 2016-13280 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 36264-36265] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-13280] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-804, A-412-801] Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews; 2009-2010 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 10, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) sustained the Final Remand Redetermination pertaining to the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom covering the period May 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010.\1\ Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the public that the Court's final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Final Results, and that the Department is amending the Final Results with respect to all respondents that were subject to these administrative reviews.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Final Results of Remand Redetermination (Final Remand Redetermination) Pursuant to The Timken Company v. United States, 79 F. Supp. 3d 1350 (CIT 2015) (Remand Order), aff'd The Timken Company v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14-00155, slip op. 16-47, 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 45 (Ct. Int'l Trade May 10, 2016) (Remand Affirmation). \2\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Review in Part; 2009-2010, 79 FR 35312 (June 20, 2014) (Final Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective May 20, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0410 or (202) 482-1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 8, 2015, the Court remanded the Final Results for the Department to apply a differential pricing analysis.\3\ On remand, the Department applied a differential pricing analysis, under protest, and as a result, the weighted-average dumping margin for each respondent subject to these administrative reviews changed. On May 10, 2016, the Court upheld the Final Remand Redetermination in full.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Remand Order, 79 F. Supp. 3d at 1361. \4\ See Remand Affirmation at 26. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timken Notice In its decision in Timken, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Remand Affirmation sustaining the Final Remand Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the Court which is not in harmony with the Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court decision, the Department is amending the Final Results with respect to all respondents as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Company Rate (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JAPAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.................................... 1.33 Audi AG................................................. 4.58 Bosch Corporation....................................... 4.58 Bosch Packaging Technology K.K.......................... 4.58 Bosch Rexroth Corporation............................... 4.58 Caterpillar Japan Ltd................................... 4.58 Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L............................ 4.58 Caterpillar Group Services S.A.......................... 4.58 Caterpillar Brazil Ltd.................................. 4.58 Caterpillar Africa Pty. Ltd............................. 4.58 Caterpillar of Australia Pty. Ltd....................... 4.58 [[Page 36265]] Caterpillar S.A.R.L..................................... 4.58 Caterpillar Americas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.......... 4.58 Caterpillar Logistics Services China Ltd................ 4.58 Caterpillar Mexico, S.A. de C.V......................... 4.58 Hagglunds Ltd........................................... 4.58 Hino Motors Ltd......................................... 4.58 JTEKT Corporation (formerly known as Koyo Seiko Co., 4.58 Ltd.).................................................. Kongskilde Limited...................................... 4.58 Mazda Motor Corporation................................. 4.58 Mori Seiki Co., Ltd..................................... 0.65 Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation............................. 4.58 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd............................... 4.58 NSK Ltd................................................. 2.79 NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation............... 6.37 Perkins Engines Company Limited......................... 4.58 Volkswagen AG........................................... 4.58 Volkswagen Zubehor GmbH................................. 4.58 Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation...................... 4.58 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ UNITED KINGDOM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alcatel Vacuum Technology............................... 6.47 Bosch Rexroth Ltd....................................... 6.47 Caterpillar S.A.R.L..................................... 6.47 Caterpillar Group Services S.A.......................... 6.47 Caterpillar of Australia Pty Ltd........................ 6.47 Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L............................ 6.47 Caterpillar Marine Power UK............................. 6.47 NSK Bearings Europe Ltd................................. 6.47 Perkins Engines Company Ltd............................. 6.47 SKF (U.K.) Limited and SKF Aeroengine Bearings U.K...... 6.47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed, or if it is appealed and upheld by the CAFC, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on entries of the subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation, we calculated importer-specific assessment rates by dividing the total amount of dumping for the reviewed sales by the total entered vale of those reviewed sales for each importer. For entries of subject merchandise during the period of reviews produced by Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation, for which they did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the country-specific all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For all other companies listed above, which were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at a rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin listed above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by such firms. Cash Deposit Requirements Because we revoked the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom effective September 15, 2011, no cash deposits for estimated antidumping duties on future entries of subject merchandise will be required.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516(A)(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 31, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-13280 Filed 6-3-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![36264 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2016 / Notices
determination of this investigation is no Dated: May 31, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
later than June 22, 2016. Paul Piquado, Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
Postponement of Preliminary Compliance. and Compliance, International Trade
Determination [FR Doc. 2016–13278 Filed 6–3–16; 8:45 am] Administration, U.S. Department of
On May 3, 2016, Titan Tire BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
Corporation and the United Steel, Paper NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–0410 or (202) 482–1690,
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE respectively.
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union, AFL–CIO, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
International Trade Administration
CLC (USW) (collectively, Petitioners) Background
made a timely request, pursuant to 19 [A–588–804, A–412–801]
CFR 351.205(e), for postponement of the On July 8, 2015, the Court remanded
preliminary determination, in order to Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From the Final Results for the Department to
provide the Department with sufficient Japan and the United Kingdom: Notice apply a differential pricing analysis.3
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With On remand, the Department applied a
time to develop the record in this
the Final Results of Antidumping Duty differential pricing analysis, under
proceeding through additional
Administrative Reviews; 2009–2010 protest, and as a result, the weighted-
questionnaires, which Petitioners will average dumping margin for each
in turn need to analyze and possibly AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, respondent subject to these
comment on. Because there are no International Trade Administration, administrative reviews changed. On
compelling reasons to deny Petitioners’ Department of Commerce. May 10, 2016, the Court upheld the
request, in accordance with section SUMMARY: On May 10, 2016, the United
Final Remand Redetermination in full.4
773(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department States Court of International Trade (the
is postponing the deadline for the Court) sustained the Final Remand Timken Notice
preliminary determination by 50 days. Redetermination pertaining to the In its decision in Timken, as clarified
administrative reviews of the by Diamond Sawblades, the CAFC held
For the reasons stated above, the antidumping duty orders on ball
Department, in accordance with section that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
bearings and parts thereof from Japan Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing and the United Kingdom covering the
the deadline for the preliminary the Department must publish a notice of
period May 1, 2009, through April 30, a court decision that is not ‘‘in
determination to no later than 190 days 2010.1 Consistent with the decision of harmony’’ with a Department
after the date on which the Department the United States Court of Appeals for determination and must suspend
initiated this investigation. Therefore, the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken liquidation of entries pending a
the new deadline for the preliminary Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
determination is August 11, 2016. In Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Remand Affirmation sustaining the
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. Final Remand Redetermination
Act, the deadline for the final United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. constitutes a final decision of the Court
determination of this investigation will 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the which is not in harmony with the Final
continue to be 75 days after the date of Department of Commerce (the Results. This notice is published in
the preliminary determination, unless Department) is notifying the public that fulfillment of the publication
postponed at a later date. the Court’s final judgment in this case requirements of Timken.
is not in harmony with the Final
This notice is issued and published Amended Final Results
Results, and that the Department is
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
amending the Final Results with respect Because there is now a final court
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
to all respondents that were subject to decision, the Department is amending
these administrative reviews.2 the Final Results with respect to all
DATES: Effective May 20, 2016. respondents as follows:
Company Rate (percent)
JAPAN
Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd. ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1.33
Audi AG ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Bosch Corporation ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Bosch Packaging Technology K.K. ..................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Bosch Rexroth Corporation ................................................................................................................................................................. 4.58
Caterpillar Japan Ltd. .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L. ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.58
Caterpillar Group Services S.A. .......................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Caterpillar Brazil Ltd. ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Caterpillar Africa Pty. Ltd. .................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Caterpillar of Australia Pty. Ltd. ........................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
1 See Final Results of Remand Redetermination 00155, slip op. 16–47, 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and
(Final Remand Redetermination) Pursuant to The 45 (Ct. Int’l Trade May 10, 2016) (Remand Rescission of Review in Part; 2009–2010, 79 FR
Timken Company v. United States, 79 F. Supp. 3d Affirmation). 35312 (June 20, 2014) (Final Results).
3 See Remand Order, 79 F. Supp. 3d at 1361.
1350 (CIT 2015) (Remand Order), aff’d The Timken 2 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan
Company v. United States, Consol. Court No. 14– and the United Kingdom: Final Results of 4 See Remand Affirmation at 26.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Jun 03, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_36372/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 108 / Monday, June 6, 2016 / Notices 36265
Company Rate (percent)
Caterpillar S.A.R.L. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4.58
Caterpillar Americas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. ................................................................................................................................ 4.58
Caterpillar Logistics Services China Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................. 4.58
Caterpillar Mexico, S.A. de C.V. .......................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Hagglunds Ltd. ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Hino Motors Ltd. .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4.58
JTEKT Corporation (formerly known as Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.) .......................................................................................................... 4.58
Kongskilde Limited ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Mazda Motor Corporation .................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 0.65
Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation ................................................................................................................................................................ 4.58
Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
NSK Ltd. .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2.79
NTN Corporation and NTN Kongo Corporation .................................................................................................................................. 6.37
Perkins Engines Company Limited ..................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Volkswagen AG ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Volkswagen Zubehor GmbH ............................................................................................................................................................... 4.58
Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation ................................................................................................................................................ 4.58
UNITED KINGDOM
Alcatel Vacuum Technology ................................................................................................................................................................ 6.47
Bosch Rexroth Ltd. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6.47
Caterpillar S.A.R.L. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6.47
Caterpillar Group Services S.A. .......................................................................................................................................................... 6.47
Caterpillar of Australia Pty Ltd. ............................................................................................................................................................ 6.47
Caterpillar Overseas S.A.R.L. ............................................................................................................................................................. 6.47
Caterpillar Marine Power UK ............................................................................................................................................................... 6.47
NSK Bearings Europe Ltd. .................................................................................................................................................................. 6.47
Perkins Engines Company Ltd. ........................................................................................................................................................... 6.47
SKF (U.K.) Limited and SKF Aeroengine Bearings U.K. .................................................................................................................... 6.47
In the event the Court’s ruling is not margin listed above to all entries of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
appealed, or if it is appealed and upheld subject merchandise produced and/or
by the CAFC, the Department will exported by such firms. International Trade Administration
instruct U.S. Customs and Border [A–570–016]
Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping Cash Deposit Requirements
duties on entries of the subject Because we revoked the antidumping Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck
merchandise exported by the companies duty orders on ball bearings and parts Tires From the People’s Republic of
listed above. In accordance with 19 CFR China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty
thereof from Japan and the United
351.212(b)(1), for Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., New Shipper Review; 2015–2016
Kingdom effective September 15, 2011,
Mori Seiki Co., Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK
no cash deposits for estimated AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Bearings Europe Ltd., and NTN
Corporation and NTN Kongo antidumping duties on future entries of International Trade Administration,
Corporation, we calculated importer- subject merchandise will be required.5 Department of Commerce.
specific assessment rates by dividing the This notice is issued and published in SUMMARY: On February 25, 2016, the
total amount of dumping for the accordance with sections 516(A)(e), Department received a timely request
reviewed sales by the total entered vale 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. for a new shipper review (NSR) from
of those reviewed sales for each Shandong Xinghongyuan Tire Co., Ltd.
Dated: May 31, 2016. (‘‘SXT’’), in accordance with section
importer.
Paul Piquado, 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of reviews produced Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
by Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd., Mori Seiki Co., Compliance. 351.214(c). The Department of
Ltd., NSK Ltd., NSK Bearings Europe [FR Doc. 2016–13280 Filed 6–3–16; 8:45 am] Commerce (Department) has determined
Ltd., and NTN Corporation and NTN BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P that the request for a NSR of the
Kongo Corporation, for which they did antidumping duty order on Passenger
not know their merchandise was Vehicle and Light Truck Tires
destined for the United States, we will (passenger tires) from the People’s
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed Republic of China (PRC) meets the
entries at the country-specific all-others statutory and regulatory requirements
rate if there is no rate for the for initiation. The period of review
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
intermediate company(ies) involved in (POR) is August 1, 2015, through,
the transaction. January 31, 2016.
For all other companies listed above, DATES: Effective June 6, 2016.
which were not selected for individual 5 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Japan FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
examination, we will instruct CBP to and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Sunset Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations,
assess antidumping duties at a rate Reviews and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Office VII, Enforcement and
equal to the weighted-average dumping Orders, 79 FR 16771 (March 26, 2014). Compliance, International Trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Jun 03, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_36372/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-04 00:16:35
Document Modified: 2016-06-04 00:16:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective May 20, 2016. | |
| Contact | Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0410 or (202) 482-1690, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 36264 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR