82 FR 29033 - Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 122 (June 27, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 122 (June 27, 2017)
| Page Range | 29033-29037 | |
| FR Document | 2017-13426 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 27, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 29033-29037] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-13426] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-979] Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 22, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells) from the People's [[Page 29034]] Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2014, through November 30, 2015. The review covers two mandatory respondents: (1) Canadian Solar International Limited, which we have treated as a single entity with five affiliated companies identified below, and (2) the collapsed entity Trina Solar, consisting of Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., and Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd., which we have continued to treat as a single entity with four additional affiliated companies identified below. We received comments from interested parties on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for the Final Results of this administrative review. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. DATES: Effective June 27, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill and Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037 or (202) 482-2769, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 22, 2016, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2014-2015 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells from the PRC.\1\ For events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Department's Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ On March 30, 2017, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department extended the deadline for issuing the final results by 60 days.\3\ The deadline for the final results is June 20, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 93888 (December 22, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, From the People's Republic of China,'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. \3\ See Memorandum, ``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 30, 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to, modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials.\4\ Merchandise covered by the order is classifiable under subheading 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made revisions to our preliminary calculations of the weighted-average dumping margins for mandatory respondents, Canadian Solar \5\ and Trina.6 7 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ In these final results of review, the Department has continued to treat the following six companies as a single entity: Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc./CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI-GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. (collectively, Canadian Solar). See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 93888, 93889 and PDM at 6 7. \6\ In these final results of review, the Department has continued to treat the following six companies as a single entity: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./ Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (collectively, Trina). See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 93888, 93889 and PDM at 6-7. \7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comments 4, 7, 8, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, and 24. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we found that seven companies had no shipments during the POR.\8\ Consistent with the Department's assessment practice in NME cases, we completed the review with respect to the above-named companies. However, we have reexamined the record and determined that we made an error in the Preliminary Results by not recognizing that Shenzhen Glory Industries Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen Glory) timely filed a no-shipment certification.\9\ We have reviewed Shenzhen Glory's no shipment certification and have found that Shenzhen Glory had no shipments during this POR. In addition, we found that Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Sunny), a company we preliminarily determined had no shipments during the POR, had a reviewable sale/entry of subject merchandise during the POR. Therefore, for these Final Results, we find that a total of seven companies had no shipments during the POR.\10\ As noted [[Page 29035]] in the ``Assessment'' section below, the Department will issue appropriate instructions with respect to these companies to CBP based on our Final Results.\11\ In addition, these companies will maintain their rate from the most recent segment in which they participated. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 93888, 93889. \9\ See Shenzhen Glory's February 24, 2016 Notice of No Sales Letter. \10\ Those companies are: BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd., Canadian Solar Inc., Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Jiangsu High Hope Int'l Group, Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd/Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd., Zhongli Talesun Solar Co. Ltd, and Shenzhen Glory. On January 6, 2017, the Department placed on the record certain factual information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding the no shipments claims and provided interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the information. See Department Letter re: Release of U.S. Customs and Border Protection Information Relating to No Shipment Claims Made in the 2014-2015 Administrative Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from the People's Republic of China, dated January 6, 2017. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. commented on the information, arguing that none of the new information on the record contradicts the Department's preliminary decision regarding its no shipment claim. No other parties commented on the information. See Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.'s January 13, 2017 Comments on CBP Information. \11\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment of Antidumping Duties); see also the ``Assessment'' section of this notice, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Separate Rates In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Canadian Solar, Trina, and 24 other companies/company groups demonstrated their eligibility for separate rates, but that Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo Hisheen Electrical Co., Ltd., and Shenzhen Glory had not demonstrated their entitlement to separate rates status because they did not file either a separate rate application or certification with the Department.\12\ However, as noted above, for these Final Results, the Department has determined that Shenzhen Glory timely filed a no shipments claim and record information supports its claim. Additionally, as explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, the Department has determined that Sunny is eligible for separate rate status, but that Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. (Ningbo Qixin) did not meet the requirements for obtaining a separate rate. Therefore, for these Final Results, the Department finds that Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo Hisheen Electrical Co., Ltd., and Ningbo Qixin are not eligible for separate rate status and thus, are part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department assigned a dumping margin to the separate rate companies that it did not individually examine, but which demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate, based on the mandatory respondents' dumping margins.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ Id. \13\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Final Dumping Margin for Separate Rate Recipients,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted-average Exporter dumping margins (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar 13.07 Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang)Inc./CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI- GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc............................ Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar 4.66 (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./ Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./ Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./ Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.............................. Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd..................... 6.98 ERA Solar Co., Ltd.................................. 6.98 ET Solar Energy Limited............................. 6.98 Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. 6.98 Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd............. 6.98 JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd............... 6.98 Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd............... 6.98 Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.......................... 6.98 JingAo Solar Co., Ltd............................... 6.98 Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.................. 6.98 Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd........................... 6.98 Risen Energy Co., Ltd............................... 6.98 Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd............................... 6.98 Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd............... 6.98 Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd..................... 6.98 Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd...................... 6.98 Star Power International Limited.................... 6.98 Systemes Versilis, Inc.............................. 6.98 Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd........................... 6.98 tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd....................... 6.98 Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd............... 6.98 Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.................. 6.98 Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding 6.98 Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./ Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./ Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./ Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./ Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./ Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./ Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd...... Zhejiang Era Solar Technology Co., Ltd.............. 6.98 Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology 6.98 Limited Liability Company.......................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity and the Department no longer considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews,\14\ we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide entity. Thus, the weighted-average dumping margin for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 percent) is not subject to change as a result of this review.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). \15\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2013-2014, 81 FR 39905 (June 20, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days [[Page 29036]] after the publication date of these Final Results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-)specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will calculate importer- (or customer)-specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, the Department calculated importer- (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to the importer- (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to the importer- (or customer).\16\ Where the Department calculated an importer- (or customer)-specific weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to the importer- (or customer) by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer- (or customer)-specific assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit rates.\17\ Where an importer- (or customer)-specific ad valorem or per- unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation. Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \17\ Id. \18\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For merchandise whose sale/entry was not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, but that entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the individually-examined exporter's cash deposit rate), the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion of this practice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the Final Results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate listed for each exporter in the table in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice, except if the rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated PRC and non- PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these Final Results within five days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice of the Final Results of this antidumping duty administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: June 20, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Apply Partial AFA to Trina's Unreported Factors of Production for Purchased Solar Cells Comment 2: Application of Partial AFA To Value Trina's Unreported FOPs Comment 3: Whether the Department Should Apply Partial AFA to Canadian Solar's Unreported Factors of Production for Purchased Solar Cells Comment 4: Application of Partial AFA To Value Canadian Solar's Unreported FOPs Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Semi-Finished Polysilicon Ingots and Blocks Comment 6: Data Source Used to Value Polysilicon and Mono & Multi Crystalline Wafers and Solar Cells Comment 7: Surrogate Value for Scrap Cells and Modules Comment 8: Surrogate Value for Silicon Scrap Offsets Comment 9: Surrogate Value for Recycled Silicon Scrap Comment 10: Surrogate Value for Aluminum Frames Comment 11: Surrogate Value for Backsheet Comment 12: Surrogate Value for Module Glass Comment 13: Surrogate Value for Nitrogen Comment 14: Surrogate Value for Canadian Solar's Silver Paste Comment 15: Surrogate Value for Quartz Crucibles Comment 16: Selection of Financial Statements Comment 17: Trina's Ocean Freight Comment 18: Differential Pricing [[Page 29037]] Comment 19: Calculation of Warranty Expenses Comment 20: Insurance Costs Related to Warranties Comment 21: Treatment of Overhead Items Comment 22: Debt Restructuring Income Comment 23: Exclusion of Import Data with Values but Quantities of Zero Comment 24: Clerical Errors Comment 25: Separate Rate Status for Shenzhen Glory Industries Co., Ltd. Comment 26: Separate Rate Status for Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Comment 27: Separate Rate Status for Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Comment 28: Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd.'s Liquidation Instructions [FR Doc. 2017-13426 Filed 6-26-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Notices 29033
the GOI and GOC via ACCESS. To the 351.301, or as otherwise specified by the APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
extent practicable, we will attempt to Secretary. In general, an extension 22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate
provide a copy of the public version of request will be considered untimely if it in this investigation should ensure that
the Petitions to each exporter named in is filed after the expiration of the time they meet the requirements of these
the Petitions, as provided under 19 CFR limit established under 19 CFR 351.301 procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of
351.203(c)(2). expires. For submissions that are due appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
from multiple parties simultaneously, 351.103(d)).
ITC Notification
an extension request will be considered This notice is issued and published
We will notify the ITC of our untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET pursuant to sections 702 and 777(i) of
initiation, as required by section 702(d) on the due date. Under certain the Act.
of the Act. circumstances, we may elect to specify Dated: June 20, 2017.
a different time limit by which
Preliminary Determinations by the ITC Ronald K. Lorentzen,
extension requests will be considered
The ITC will preliminarily determine, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
untimely for submissions which are due
and Compliance.
within 45 days after the date on which from multiple parties simultaneously. In
the Petitions were filed, whether there such a case, we will inform parties in Appendix
is a reasonable indication that imports the letter or memorandum setting forth Scope of the Investigations
of fine denier PSF from India and the the deadline (including a specified time)
PRC are materially injuring, or The merchandise covered by these
by which extension requests must be
investigations is fine denier polyester staple
threatening material injury to, a U.S. filed to be considered timely. An fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed,
industry.33 A negative ITC extension request must be made in a measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in
determination will result in the separate, stand-alone submission; under diameter. The scope covers all fine denier
investigations being terminated.34 limited circumstances we will grant PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The
Otherwise, these investigations will untimely-filed requests for the extension following products are excluded from the
proceed according to statutory and of time limits. Parties should review scope:
regulatory time limits. Extension of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3. decitex
FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), (more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently
Submission of Factual Information classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/
Factual information is defined in 19 Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065.
CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) Evidence 22853.htm, prior to submitting factual (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bi-
submitted in response to questionnaires; information in these investigations. component fiber with a polyester core and an
(ii) evidence submitted in support of outer, polyester sheath that melts at a
allegations; (iii) publicly available Certification Requirements
significantly lower temperature than its inner
information to value factors under 19 Any party submitting factual polyester core currently classified under
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the information in an AD or CVD HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015.
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR proceeding must certify to the accuracy Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on and completeness of that information.37 HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although
the record by the Department; and (v) Parties are hereby reminded that revised the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
evidence other than factual information convenience and customs purposes, the
certification requirements are in effect
written description of the scope of the
described in (i)–(iv). 19 CFR 351.301(b) for company/government officials, as investigations is dispositive.
requires any party, when submitting well as their representatives.
[FR Doc. 2017–13381 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
factual information, to specify under Investigations initiated on the basis of
which subsection of 19 CFR BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
petitions filed on or after August 16,
351.102(b)(21) the information is being 2013, and other segments of any AD or
submitted35 and, if the information is CVD proceedings initiated on or after
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct August 16, 2013, should use the formats
factual information already on the for the revised certifications provided at International Trade Administration
record, to provide an explanation the end of the Final Rule.38 The
identifying the information already on Department intends to reject factual [A–570–979]
the record that the factual information submissions if the submitting party does
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.36 Time not comply with the applicable revised Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
limits for the submission of factual certification requirements. Whether or Not Assembled Into
information are addressed in 19 CFR Modules, From the People’s Republic
Notification to Interested Parties of China: Final Results of Antidumping
351.301, which provides specific time
limits based on the type of factual Interested parties must submit Duty Administrative Review and Final
information being submitted. Interested applications for disclosure under APO Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
parties should review the regulations in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 2015
prior to submitting factual information January 22, 2008, the Department
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
in these investigations. published Antidumping and
International Trade Administration,
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Extensions of Time Limits Department of Commerce.
Documents Submission Procedures;
SUMMARY: On December 22, 2016, the
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Parties may request an extension of
time limits before the expiration of a 37 See section 782(b) of the Act. Department of Commerce (the
time limit established under 19 CFR 38 See Certification of Factual Information to Department) published the preliminary
Import Administration During Antidumping and results of the third administrative
33 See
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July review of the antidumping duty (AD)
section 703(a)(2) of the Act. 17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also frequently asked
34 See section 703(a)(1) of the Act. questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic
35 See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ cells, whether or not assembled into
36 See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2). info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. modules (solar cells) from the People’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jun 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29155/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 27, 2017 / Notices 29037
Comment 19: Calculation of Warranty services in accordance with applicable Committee, Office of Energy &
Expenses U.S. laws and regulations, including Environmental Industries, U.S.
Comment 20: Insurance Costs Related to advice on how U.S. civil nuclear goods Department of Commerce, Mail Stop
Warranties and services export policies, programs, 28018, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Comment 21: Treatment of Overhead Items
Comment 22: Debt Restructuring Income
and activities will affect the U.S. civil Washington, DC 20230. For
Comment 23: Exclusion of Import Data nuclear industry’s competitiveness and consideration during the meeting, and
with Values but Quantities of Zero ability to participate in the international to ensure transmission to the Committee
Comment 24: Clerical Errors market. prior to the meeting, comments must be
Comment 25: Separate Rate Status for Topics to be considered: The agenda received no later than 5:00 p.m. EDT on
Shenzhen Glory Industries Co., Ltd. for the Thursday, July 13, 2017 CINTAC Friday, July 7, 2017. Comments received
Comment 26: Separate Rate Status for meeting is as follows: after that date will be distributed to the
Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science & members but may not be considered at
Technology Co., Ltd. Closed Session (9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m.)
the meeting.
Comment 27: Separate Rate Status for 1. Discussion of matters determined to Copies of CINTAC meeting minutes
Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance be exempt from the provisions of the
Co., Ltd. will be available within 90 days of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act meeting.
Comment 28: Toenergy Technology relating to public meetings found in 5
Hangzhou Co., Ltd.’s Liquidation Dated: June 22, 2017.
Instructions
U.S.C. App. §§ (10)(a)(1) and 10(a)(3) as
information will be disclosed that Adam O’Malley,
[FR Doc. 2017–13426 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am] Director, Office of Energy and Environmental
would be likely to significantly frustrate
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P implementation of proposed agency Industries.
actions were it to be disclosed [FR Doc. 2017–13452 Filed 6–26–17; 8:45 am]
prematurely (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B)) and BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE as trade secrets and commercial or
International Trade Administration financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Meeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade information will be disclosed. (5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(4)). National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Advisory Committee Administration
AGENCY: International Trade Public Session (3:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m.)
RIN 0648–XF495
Administration, U.S. Department of 1. Public comment period. Public
Commerce. attendance is limited and available on a Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory first-come, first-served basis. Members Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting
Committee meeting. of the public wishing to attend the
meeting must notify Mr. Jonathan AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the Chesebro at the contact information Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
schedule and proposed agenda for a above by 5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, July Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
meeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade 7, 2017 in order to pre-register. Please Commerce.
Advisory Committee (CINTAC). specify any requests for reasonable ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
DATES: The meeting is scheduled for accommodation at least five business SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Thursday, July 13, 2017, from 9:00 a.m. days in advance of the meeting. Last Management Council’s (MAFMC’s)
to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time minute requests will be accepted, but Demersal Committee will hold a public
(EDT). may not be possible to fill. meeting, jointly with a subset of the
A limited amount of time will be Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
available for pertinent brief oral Commission’s (ASMFC) Summer
the U.S. Department of Commerce,
comments from members of the public Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 1412,
attending the meeting. To accommodate Board (Board).
1401 Constitution Ave. NW.,
as many speakers as possible, the time
Washington, DC 20230. DATES: The meeting will be held on
for public comments will be limited to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. two (2) minutes per person, with a total Tuesday, July 11, 2017, from 1 p.m. to
Jonathan Chesebro, Office of Energy and public comment period of 60 minutes. 5 p.m. and on Wednesday, July 12,
Environmental Industries, International Individuals wishing to reserve speaking 2017, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Trade Administration, Mail Stop 28018, time during the meeting must contact ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Mr. Chesebro and submit a brief the Hilton Baltimore BWI Airport Hotel,
Washington, DC 20230. (Phone: 202– statement of the general nature of the 1739 W. Nursery Rd., Linthicum, MD
482–1297; Fax: 202–482–5665; email: comments and the name and address of 21090; telephone: (410) 694–0808.
jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov). the proposed participant by 5:00 p.m. Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EDT on Friday, July 7, 2017. If the Management Council, 800 N. State
Background: The CINTAC was number of registrants requesting to Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901;
established under the discretionary make statements is greater than can be telephone: (302) 674–2331 or on their
authority of the Secretary of Commerce reasonably accommodated during the Web site at www.mafmc.org.
and in accordance with the Federal meeting, ITA may conduct a lottery to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. determine the speakers. Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive
App.), in response to an identified need Any member of the public may Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
for consensus advice from U.S. industry submit pertinent written comments Management Council, telephone: (302)
to the U.S. Government regarding the concerning the CINTAC’s affairs at any 526–5255.
development and administration of time before and after the meeting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
programs to expand United States Comments may be submitted to the Demersal Committee and members of
exports of civil nuclear goods and Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory the Board will meet to review and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jun 26, 2017 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_29155/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-14 10:15:04
Document Modified: 2018-11-14 10:15:04
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective June 27, 2017. | |
| Contact | Krisha Hill and Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037 or (202) 482-2769, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 29033 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR