82 FR 47477 - Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 196 (October 12, 2017)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 82, Issue 196 (October 12, 2017)
| Page Range | 47477-47479 | |
| FR Document | 2017-22072 |
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)] [Notices] [Pages 47477-47479] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2017-22072] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-489-815] Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the Department of Commerce (Department) published the preliminary results of the 2015-2016 administrative review (AR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Turkey for the period May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016 (POR). Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the margin calculations for the final results of this AR. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, [[Page 47478]] Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3518. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 6, 2017, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the 2015-2016 AR of the AD order on LWRPT from Turkey.\1\ For events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Department's Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ This review covers nine producers/exporters of subject merchandise, including the two respondents selected for individual examination: Agir Haddecilik A.S. (Agir), Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., CINAR Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S., Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015- 2016, 82 FR 26044 (June 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Decision Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary, Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey,'' dated May 31,2017 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). \2\ See Memorandum from James Maeder, Senior Director, performing the duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Operations to Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance ``2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order is certain welded carbon quality light-walled steel pipe and tube, of rectangular (including square) cross section, having a wall thickness of less than 4 mm.\3\ The welded carbon-quality rectangular pipe and tube subject to this order is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and CBP's customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we made revisions to our preliminary calculations of the weighted-average dumping margins for the mandatory respondents, CINAR and Noksel.\4\ Regarding CINAR, the Department modified CINAR's home market and margin calculation programs to capture all domestic brokerage and handling expenses and revised the date parameters that define home market and U.S. sales. Regarding Noksel, the Department modified Noksel's U.S. margin program to exclude certain sales that were entered outside of the POR. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comments 7, 8, and 11. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we found that one company, Agir Haddecilik A.S., had no shipments during the POR.\5\ Consistent with the Department's assessment practice, the Department completed the review with respect to Agir.\6\ For these final results, we continue to find that Agir had no shipments during the POR.\7\ As noted in the ``Assessment'' section below, the Department will issue appropriate instructions with respect to this company to CBP based on our final results.\8\ In addition, Agir will maintain its dumping margin from the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which it participated., i.e., 0.00 percent.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results. \6\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at 51306 (August 28, 2014). \7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. \8\ See ``Assessment'' section of this notice, below. \9\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 28823 (May 10, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted- average dumping margins exist for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Manufacturer/exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cinar Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.................... 18.16 Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S............................... 4.93 Agir Haddecilik A.S........................................ (*) Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S...................... 7.22 Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S................................. 7.22 Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.................................... 7.22 Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S........................ 7.22 Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S................. 7.22 Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S........................ 7.22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * No shipments or sales subject to this review. Consistent with the Preliminary Results, we calculated a weighted- average margin for the companies not selected for individual examination (i.e., Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S.) using the weighted-average dumping margins of the individually- examined respondents, based on their publicly available, ranged total U.S. sales values of the selected respondents. The resulting weighted- average dumping margin being assigned [[Page 47479]] to the non-individually examined respondents is 7.22 percent.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Memorandum from Jonathan Hill, International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance to The File ``Final Results of the 2015--2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Calculation of the Rate for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure The Department intends to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates The Department shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\11\ The Department calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. The Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to the Final Modification for Reviews, we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer- specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. Additionally, because the Department determined that Agir Haddecilik A.S. had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under the company's case numbers (i.e., at the company's rate) will be liquidated at the all-others rate effective during the period of review, consistent with the Department's practice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 27.04 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 73 FR 19814 (April 11, 2008). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice of the final results of this antidumping duty administrative review is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: October 4, 2017. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues I. General Issues Comment 1: Cash Deposit Instructions Comment 2: Assessment of Antidumping Duties II. Company Specific Issues Agir Haddecilik A.S. Comment 3: Finding of No Shipments CINAR Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Comment 4: Certificate of Service Comment 5: Duty Drawback Adjustment Comment 6: Product Characteristic Modification Comment 7: Home Market and Margin SAS Program Date Parameters Comment 8: U.S. Brokerage and Handling (B&H) Expenses Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. Comment 9: Duty Drawback Adjustment Comment 10: Imputed Home Market Credit Expenses Comment 11: Inclusion of Certain Sales Outside of the POR Comment 12: Application of AFA to a U.S. Sale Comment 13: Application of AFA Based on CBP Entry Data Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017-22072 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices 47477
Public Comment On September 20, 2017, pursuant to 2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While HTSUS
19 CFR 351.210(e), Elkem requested that numbers are provided for convenience and
Case briefs or other written comments customs purposes, the written description of
may be submitted to the Assistant the Department postpone the final
the scope remains dispositive.
Secretary for Enforcement and determination and that provisional
Compliance no later than seven days measures be extended to a period not to Appendix II
exceed six months.7 In accordance with
after the date on which the last List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 Decision Memorandum
verification report is issued in this
CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) The
investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to I. Summary
preliminary determination is
issues raised in case briefs, may be II. Background
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter III. Period of Investigation
submitted no later than five days after
accounts for a significant proportion of IV. Scope Comments
the deadline date for case briefs.6
exports of the subject merchandise; and V. Preliminary Determination of No Sales
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial VI. Discussion of the Methodology
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or A. Determination of the Comparison
exist, the Department is postponing the
rebuttal briefs in this investigation are Method
final determination and extending the
encouraged to submit with each B. Results of the Differential Pricing
provisional measures from a four-month
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; period to a period not greater than six
Analysis
(2) a brief summary of the argument; VII. Date of Sale
months. Accordingly, the Department VIII. Product Comparisons
and (3) a table of authorities. will make its final determination no
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), IX. Export Price and Constructed Export
later than 135 days after the date of Price
interested parties who wish to request a publication of this preliminary X. Normal Value
hearing, limited to issues raised in the determination. A. Home Market Viability
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a B. Level of Trade
written request to the Assistant International Trade Commission C. Cost of Production Analysis
Secretary for Enforcement and Notification 1. Calculation of COP
Compliance, U.S. Department of In accordance with section 733(f) of 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
Commerce, within 30 days after the date 3. Results of the COP Test
the Act, the Department will notify the D. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
of publication of this notice. Requests International Trade Commission (ITC) of Market Prices
should contain the party’s name, its preliminary determination. If the E. Calculation of NV Based on Constructed
address, and telephone number, the final determination is affirmative, the Value
number of participants, whether any ITC will determine before the later of XI. Currency Conversion
participant is a foreign national, and a 120 days after the date of this XII. Critical Circumstances
list of the issues to be discussed. If a preliminary determination or 45 days XIII. Conclusion
request for a hearing is made, the after the final determination whether [FR Doc. 2017–22065 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am]
Department intends to hold the hearing these imports are materially injuring, or BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, threaten material injury to, the U.S.
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., industry.
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
date to be determined. Parties should Notification to Interested Parties
confirm by telephone the date, time, and This determination is issued and International Trade Administration
location of the hearing two days before published in accordance with sections [A–489–815]
the scheduled date. 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c). Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Postponement of Final Determination Tube: Final Results of Antidumping
and Extension of Provisional Measures Dated: October 4, 2017.
Gary Taverman, Duty Administrative Review and Final
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Determination of No Shipments; 2015–
that a final determination may be and Countervailing Duty Operations 2016
postponed until not later than 135 days performing the non-exclusive functions and AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
after the date of the publication of the duties of the Assistant Secretary for
International Trade Administration,
preliminary determination if, in the Enforcement and Compliance.
Department of Commerce.
event of an affirmative preliminary Appendix I
determination, a request for such SUMMARY: On June 6, 2017, the
postponement is made by exporters who Scope of the Investigation Department of Commerce (Department)
account for a significant proportion of The scope of this investigation covers all published the preliminary results of the
exports of the subject merchandise, or in forms and sizes of silicon metal, including 2015–2016 administrative review (AR)
the event of a negative preliminary silicon metal powder. Silicon metal contains of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
determination, a request for such at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 light-walled rectangular pipe and tube
percent silicon, and less than 4.00 percent (LWRPT) from Turkey for the period
postponement is made by the petitioner. iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade
Section 351.210(e)(2) of the May 1, 2015, through April 30, 2016
silicon (merchandise containing at least (POR). Based on our analysis of the
Department’s regulations requires that a 99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and
comments received, we made changes to
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
request by exporters for postponement classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
of the final determination be Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the margin calculations for the final
accompanied by a request for extension subheading 2804.61.0000) is excluded from results of this AR. The final weighted-
of provisional measures from a four- the scope of this investigation. average dumping margins are listed
Silicon metal is currently classifiable below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
month period to a period not more than under subheadings 2804.69.1000 and
six months in duration. section of this notice.
7 See Letter from Elkem, ‘‘Request for
DATES: Applicable October 12, 2017.
6 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 Postponement of Final Determination,’’ dated FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(for general filing requirements). September 20, 2017. Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_47673/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 196 / Thursday, October 12, 2017 / Notices 47479
to the non-individually examined cash deposit rate for respondents noted Dated: October 4, 2017.
respondents is 7.22 percent.10 above will be the rate established in the Gary Taverman,
Disclosure final results of this administrative Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
review; (2) for previously reviewed or and Countervailing Duty Operations,
The Department intends to disclose investigated companies not listed above, performing the non-exclusive functions and
the calculations performed for these the cash deposit rate will continue to be duties of the Assistant Secretary for
final results of review within five days Enforcement and Compliance.
the company-specific rate published for
of the date of publication of this notice Appendix
the most recent period; (3) if the
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). exporter is not a firm covered in this List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
review, a prior review, or the original Decision Memorandum
Assessment Rates investigation, but the producer is, the Summary
The Department shall determine and cash deposit rate will be the rate Scope of the Order
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) established for the most recent period Discussion of the Issues
shall assess antidumping duties on all for the producer of the merchandise; I. General Issues
appropriate entries.11 The Department and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other Comment 1: Cash Deposit Instructions
Comment 2: Assessment of Antidumping
calculated importer-specific ad valorem producers or exporters will continue to Duties
antidumping duty assessment rates by be 27.04 percent, the all-others rate II. Company Specific Issues
aggregating the total amount of dumping established in the investigation.12 These Agir Haddecilik A.S.
calculated for the examined sales of cash deposit requirements, when Comment 3: Finding of No Shipments
each importer and dividing each of imposed, shall remain in effect until CINAR Boru Profil Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
these amounts by the total entered value further notice. Comment 4: Certificate of Service
associated with those sales. The Comment 5: Duty Drawback Adjustment
Department will instruct CBP to assess Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 6: Product Characteristic
Reimbursement of Duties Modification
antidumping duties on all appropriate Comment 7: Home Market and Margin SAS
entries covered by this review where an Program Date Parameters
importer-specific assessment rate is not This notice also serves as a final
Comment 8: U.S. Brokerage and Handling
zero or de minimis. Pursuant to the reminder to importers of their
(B&H) Expenses
Final Modification for Reviews, we will responsibility under 19 CFR Noksel Celik Boru Sanayi A.S.
instruct CBP to liquidate without regard 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Comment 9: Duty Drawback Adjustment
to antidumping duties any entries for regarding the reimbursement of Comment 10: Imputed Home Market Credit
which the importer-specific assessment antidumping duties prior to liquidation Expenses
of the relevant entries during this Comment 11: Inclusion of Certain Sales
rate is zero or de minimis. Additionally, Outside of the POR
because the Department determined that review period. Failure to comply with
Comment 12: Application of AFA to a U.S.
Agir Haddecilik A.S. had no shipments this requirement could result in the Sale
of the subject merchandise, any Department’s presumption that Comment 13: Application of AFA Based on
suspended entries that entered under reimbursement of antidumping duties CBP Entry Data
the company’s case numbers (i.e., at the occurred and the subsequent assessment Recommendation
company’s rate) will be liquidated at the of double antidumping duties. [FR Doc. 2017–22072 Filed 10–11–17; 8:45 am]
all-others rate effective during the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Notification Regarding Administrative
period of review, consistent with the
Protective Orders (APO)
Department’s practice.
This notice also serves as a reminder DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cash Deposit Requirements
to parties subject to APO of their
The following cash deposit International Trade Administration
responsibility concerning the return or
requirements will be effective upon [C–489–502]
destruction of proprietary information
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
shipments of subject merchandise and Tubes From Turkey: Final Results
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, continues to govern business
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
for consumption on or after the proprietary information in this segment
Review; Calendar Year 2015
publication of the final results of this of the proceeding. Timely written
administrative review, as provided by notification of the return or destruction AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The of APO materials, or conversion to International Trade Administration,
judicial protective order, is hereby Department of Commerce.
10 See Memorandum from Jonathan Hill, requested. Failure to comply with the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
International Trade Compliance Analyst, AD/CVD regulations and terms of an APO is a (the Department) has completed the
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance violation which is subject to sanction. administrative review of the
to The File ‘‘Final Results of the 2015—2016
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light- This notice of the final results of this countervailing duty (CVD) order on
Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: antidumping duty administrative review circular welded carbon steel pipes and
asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with NOTICES
Calculation of the Rate for Respondents Not
is issued and published in accordance tubes (pipes and tubes) from Turkey for
Selected for Individual Examination,’’ dated the January 1, 2015, through December
concurrently with this notice. with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
31, 2015, period of review (POR) in
11 In these final results, the Department applied
Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in accordance with section 751(a) of the
351.221(b)(5).
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and This review covers multiple exporters/
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 12 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled Rectangular
producers, two of which are being
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 73 FR 19814 (April 11, individually examined as mandatory
Reviews). 2008). respondents. We have determined that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:35 Oct 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/82_FR_47673/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-10-25 10:04:30
Document Modified: 2018-10-25 10:04:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable October 12, 2017. | |
| Contact | Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3518. | |
| FR Citation | 82 FR 47477 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR