Document

Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul Parts 1, 2, 4, 33, 39, 40, and 53

OFPP, DoD, GSA, and NASA (collectively referred to as the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council or FAR Council) are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) ...

Office of Management and Budget
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Department of Defense
General Services Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  1. 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 4, 33, 39, 40, 52, and 53
  2. [FAR Case 2026-001, Docket No. FAR-2026-0001, Sequence No. 1]
  3. RIN 9000-AO86
( printed page 37550)

AGENCY:

Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), Office of Management and Budget (OMB); Department of Defense (DoD); General Services Administration (GSA); and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION:

Proposed rule.

SUMMARY:

OFPP, DoD, GSA, and NASA (collectively referred to as the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council or FAR Council) are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement Executive Order (E.O.) 14275, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement. The E.O. directs the elimination of excessive acquisition regulations to stop the inefficient use of American taxpayer dollars. The FAR Council is issuing twelve proposed rules that collectively will streamline the FAR in its entirety. This rule proposes revisions to FAR parts 1, 2, 4, 33, 39, 40, 52, and 53.

DATES:

Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat Division at the address shown below on or before July 23, 2026, to be considered in the formation of the final rule.

ADDRESSES:

Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2026-001 to the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for sending comments.

Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite “FAR Case 2026-001” in all correspondence related to this case. Include your name, company name (if any), and “FAR Case 2026-001” on any attached document. Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. Public comments may be submitted as an individual, as an organization, or anonymously (see frequently asked questions at https://www.regulations.gov/​faq). To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/​FAR-2026-001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For clarification of content, contact or call 202-969-4075 and cite “FAR Case 2026-001.” For information pertaining to status, publication schedules, or alternate instructions for submitting comments if https://www.regulations.gov cannot be used, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755 or . Please cite “FAR Case 2026-001.”

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

E.O. 14275, Restoring Common Sense to Federal Procurement (April 15, 2025), resets the foundation for Federal buying by requiring the FAR Council to produce a streamlined FAR that is simpler, clearer, and structured for speed. According to the E.O., the FAR has evolved from its original purpose ( i.e., to establish uniform procedures across executive departments and agencies), into an excessive and overcomplicated regulatory framework and bureaucracy. While meant to “deliver, on a timely basis, the best value product or service to the customer, while maintaining the public's trust and fulfilling public policy objectives,” the FAR has become an expensive barrier to achieving those objectives. As a result, the E.O. directed the FAR Council and OMB to create an agile, effective, and efficient regulation that contains only provisions required by statute or essential to sound procurement.

To implement E.O. 14275, OMB issued Memorandum M-25-26, Overhauling the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which announced the “Revolutionary FAR Overhaul” (RFO) and created a roadmap for producing simpler regulations aligned to statute, rewritten in plain language, and including nonstatutory requirements that are necessary to conducting a sound procurement. The memorandum described a new streamlined vision for the FAR, to be maintained alongside nonregulatory governmentwide guidance to provide a common-sense authoritative foundation for nimble response and delivery of mission capability.

This new vision represents a paradigm shift where over-engineered regulations designed for paperwork and compliance are replaced with streamlined regulations focused on core stewardship principles and nonregulatory guidance that will be used in concert with the streamlined FAR focused on proven buying strategies, critical thinking, market awareness (including to expand awareness of goods, products, and materials offered in the United States), and risk literacy to enhance workforce problem-solving. The significant reduction of unnecessary mandates is intended to clarify and reinforce the contracting officer's discretion to determine the best way to apply policies and practices. The newly established, nonregulatory guidance, which has been inspired by acquisition innovation advocates, category managers, other experienced practitioners, and many years of feedback from the contractor community—is expected to facilitate contracting officers' use of their discretion more efficiently and effectively to make smarter buying decisions.

OMB Memorandum M-25-26 also directed the FAR Council to complete the regulatory overhaul in two phases, each with robust public input. The FAR Council conducted its phase one effort in fiscal year 2025 by issuing model class deviations to replace each part in the FAR until such time as formal rulemaking occurred. This proposed rule is one of a series that constitute the FAR Council's phase two effort to obtain public comment through formal rulemaking.

II. Discussion and Analysis

A summary of proposed changes to existing parts 1, 2, 4, 33, 39, 40, 52 and 53 are as follows:

A. General

1. General RFO updates. This proposed rule generally reorganizes the FAR parts into phases of acquisition and simplifies the text into plain language, where possible. The plain language efforts include changes to active voice, edits to improve readability, and reorganization to present information more logically. None of the plain language edits are intended to change existing FAR requirements. The rewriting of the entire FAR also required edits to harmonize the changes being proposed such as updating the cross- ( printed page 37551) references. This aligns with the Federal plain language guidelines as directed by the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note).

2. Standardization of prescriptions. This rule proposes revisions to standardize prescriptions for provisions and clauses. These changes are intended to provide better clarity around the applicability of provisions and clauses such as whether they apply to commercial products and services.

3. Use of “must” instead of “shall”. Additional revisions are being proposed throughout the FAR text and FAR provisions and clauses to replace the use of the term “shall” with “must” or “will,” as appropriate, to impose requirements.

4. Non-statutory requirements. Section 4 of the E.O. required amendments to the FAR to ensure it contains only provisions that are required by statute or that are otherwise necessary to support simplicity and usability, strengthen the efficacy of the procurement system, or protect economic or national security. The FAR Council reviewed all non-statutory requirements to determine if they are still relevant and essential to sound procurement in today's contracting environment based on the criteria from section 4 of the E.O. The proposed rule retains non-statutory requirements that further one or more of the elements of sound procurements, including those requirements that serve as guardrails to protecting taxpayer interests and promote taxpayer confidence in the procurement system. Non-statutory requirements that were beneficial but not essential were retained in the non-regulatory guidance documents. Other non-statutory requirements that did not meet these standards were removed. The Council considered the extent to which regulation is the most efficient means for capturing the benefit of the policy. For example, most “how to” requirements were found to be more appropriately suited for non-regulatory coverage which better enables a contracting officer to use discretion in determining the application of a strategy to a given situation and limits the risk of overapplication, which can create wasteful burden on the contracting parties.

As part of the RFO, the FAR Council has created a number of non-regulatory resources, including the FAR Companion, which provides insight from experienced practitioners across the government on using more streamlined practices and processes. The migration of significant coverage to non-regulatory guidance is intended to ensure that the benefits of the policy are not outweighed by the compliance burden of a more rigidly written regulation that is prone to application in an overly broad manner. This approach was explained to the public in a set of “frequently asked questions” that were posted on the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul homepage shortly after the initiative was launched.

B. Summary of Changes to FAR Part 1

1. Guiding principles

Proposed revisions to the guiding principles in FAR 1.102 prioritize a “mission first” approach, positioning it as the paramount principle of the Federal Acquisition Regulations System. This ensures that all acquisition activities are directly aligned with achieving the agency's overarching objectives and serving the public interest.

The proposed changes also elevate the importance of fiscal responsibility by prioritizing the best use of taxpayer dollars, which includes price preferences and incentives for domestically sourced goods and services. This principle underscores a commitment to “Buy American” laws, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and accountability in all spending. Concurrently, the proposed changes recognize that timely acquisition and delivery are often essential for mission success.

The guiding principles retain a strong emphasis on satisfying the customer, ensuring that the needs and expectations of the end-users are met with high-quality products and services. It continues to encourage the maximization of commercial products and commercial services. It also continues to promote competition, recognizing it as a vital mechanism for driving innovation, achieving better value, while prioritizing participation of domestic suppliers to foster a resilient and competitive American industrial base. Finally, it encourages innovation, urging agencies to explore and adopt new technologies, processes, and approaches that can lead to more efficient, effective, and transformative outcomes in government contracting.

2. Forms

i. Relocation of FAR part 53, Forms. This rule proposes to relocate all information pertaining to forms from its current placement in FAR part 53, Forms to FAR part 1, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, specifically to the new proposed FAR subpart 1.6, Forms. This strategic move is designed to further enhance the consolidation of related information, by creating a more deliberate, logical, and user-friendly framework that fosters greater efficiency.

ii. Summary of changes to forms. This proposed rule directs the acquisition community to a new centralized website (see https://acquisition.gov/​FARforms) as the authoritative repository for all acquisition related forms. As a result, to update the list of forms, the FAR no longer needs to be amended through the formal rulemaking process. This reduces the administrative burden on the FAR Council and increases the Government's ability to quickly keep the list of forms up-to-date. The “Forms List” referenced in FAR 1.602(b) now performs the prescriptive function previously handled throughout FAR subparts 53.2 and 53.3, shifting the FAR's role from a static, self-contained text to a dynamic system that points to live, authoritative resources. The proposed change simplifies user access to the forms and forms-related information. The notice and comment process for substantive changes to forms prescribed by the FAR remains unchanged.

3. Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (FAR Council)

This rule proposes to update the FAR Council consistent with 41 U.S.C. chapter 13, to add the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy.

4. Regulatory Sunset

Consistent with section 6 of E.O. 14275, this rule proposes to add a new regulatory sunset requirement to the FAR. A regulatory sunset establishes a process to review sections, provisions and clauses in the FAR, and identify those policies that are no longer required or are outdated and can be removed from regulation through rulemaking. This policy serves as a built-in mechanism to prevent the accumulation of outdated or unnecessary regulations and to encourage regular review of the regulatory framework.

To facilitate the implementation of the regulatory sunset, the FAR Council anticipates standardizing this process by issuing a future proposed rule at regular timed increments requesting public input on policies that should be reviewed and considered for sunset. This process aims to ensure public input helps drive the determination of what should be sunset.

Sections, provisions and clauses do not expire until removed from the Code of Federal Regulations through rulemaking unless an expiration date is otherwise noted inside a clause. The FAR Council may indicate through rulemaking the Government's intent not ( printed page 37552) to enforce a clause after a stated date. (see FAR 1.109(b)).

5. Class Deviations From the FAR

This proposed rule revises the definition of individual deviation to correct an ambiguity and to make it clear that a solicitation with multiple awards needs a class deviation and not an individual deviation. Additional updates are being proposed to streamline the internal Government process where agencies request and receive approval for deviations from the FAR.

6. Specific Streamlining Changes

This rule proposes to make several streamlining changes to FAR part 1. While the requirements for OMB approval of information collections and recordkeeping requirements remain, to enhance efficiency and accessibility, the table listing OMB approved information collections by applicable FAR part is now available at https://www.acquisition.gov/​FAR-PRA (see FAR 1.105).

Similarly streamlined is the relocation of the table listing the renaming of public laws as a result of the positive law codification of Titles 40 and 41 of the United States Code at FAR 1.110, which is now available at https://www.acquisition.gov/​renamingpubliclaws.

This rule proposes to remove internal operating procedures related to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council and relocate it on www.acquisition.gov, where similar information is already shared.

This rule proposes to consolidate disparate policies related to the contracting officer's representative (COR) into FAR 1.404, Contracting officer's representative. This consolidation helps to more clearly identify requirements for the designation of the COR, when a COR must be designated, the qualifications required to be a COR, and COR responsibilities.

7. The Removal of Acquisition 360 Voluntary Survey Provision

This rule proposes to reduce a substantial amount of nonstatutory text in FAR part 1 including the removal of FAR provision 52.201-1, Acquisition 360: Voluntary Survey. The requirement to implement this survey is based on OFPP Memorandum Acquisition 360—Improving the Acquisition Process through Timely Feedback from External and Internal Stakeholders, dated March 18, 2015. The voluntary use of the survey has been relocated to the FAR companion guide.

8. Relocation of Statutory Text

This rule proposes to relocate FAR 1.102-2(a)(4) to paragraph (c) of FAR 7.201, Market research requirements, because the requirements address communications with industry. The text being relocated is based on requirements from Section 887 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 (Pub. L. 114-92).

9. Retention of Policy and Procedures for Sound Procurement

This rule proposes to maintain some policy that is nonstatutory because the policy is necessary for maintaining, publishing, or providing direction for the operation of the FAR system. This includes policy for the publication and code arrangement proposed to be moved from FAR 1.105-1 to FAR 1.104, which provides instructions on where the FAR is published in the CFR, how the FAR is numbered and who is responsible for publishing the FAR.

Additionally, FAR conventions are proposed to be moved from FAR 1.108 to FAR 1.107. This section consolidates policies from FAR part 1 that address the usage of definitions, the ability to delegate authority within the FAR, specific dollar thresholds, applying FAR changes to solicitations and contracts, how statutes, executive orders, and other policies are cited in the FAR, and clarifies who the FAR is directing to take action.

This rule also proposes to consolidate and maintain other policies and procedures for—

(1) Authorizing deviations from the FAR as proposed at FAR subpart 1.3,

(2) Authority and responsibilities of the contracting officer as proposed at FAR 1.402;

(3) Designating and responsibilities of the COR as proposed at FAR 1.404;

(4) Ratification of unauthorized commitments as proposed at FAR 1.405; and

(5) Determination and findings proposed at FAR subpart 1.5.

C. Summary of Changes to FAR Part 2

1. Deletions, Revisions, Additions and Relocation of Terms and Definitions

i. Deletion of Terms and Definitions

This rule proposes removing several words and terms from FAR 2.101 that are either no longer expected to be referenced in the FAR or are now defined elsewhere. The words or terms being proposed for deletion include:

Energy efficient standby power devices

Environmentally preferable

Federally controlled information system

F.o.b. . ..(for other types of F.o.b., see 47.303)

Projected average loss

Registered in the System for Award Management (SAM)

Shall

Single, Governmentwide point of entry

Sustainable acquisition

Sustainable products and services

Virgin material

Waste reduction

ii. Revisions to Existing Definitions

This rule proposes to revise the meaning of words and terms used in FAR 2.101. These revisions are a result of changes being made to the FAR in this revolutionary FAR overhaul (RFO) rule, FAR case 2026-001, or in another RFO rule FAR case. Discussion related to the changes to these terms can be found in the applicable RFO rule FAR case. The proposed rule revises the following words or terms.

Commercial computer software

Commercial product

Commercial service

Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item

Computer software

Governmentwide point of entry (GPE)

Major system

Micro-purchase

Must

Offer

Offeror

Reverse auction

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concern eligible under the SDVOSB Program

Simplified acquisition procedures

System for Award Management (SAM)

Technical data

iii. Incorporation of New Terms and Definitions

This rule proposes certain new words or terms along with their meaning to be added to FAR 2.101. These changes are a result of changes being made to the FAR in this RFO rule FAR case 2026-001, or in another RFO rule FAR case. The words or terms and their meanings are being added to FAR 2.101 because they will be used in more than one FAR part. The following words or terms are being added in FAR part 2.101:

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P

BILLING CODE 6820-EP-C

[FR Doc. 2026-12559 Filed 6-22-26; 8:45 am]

Legal Citation

Federal Register Citation

Use this for formal legal and research references to the published document.

91 FR 37550

Web Citation

Suggested Web Citation

Use this when citing the archival web version of the document.

“Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul Parts 1, 2, 4, 33, 39, 40, and 53,” thefederalregister.org (June 23, 2026), https://thefederalregister.org/documents/2026-12559/federal-acquisition-regulation-revolutionary-federal-acquisition-regulation-overhaul-parts-1-2-4-33-39-40-and-53.